Tamar
#2,438 for girls in 2025, 73 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #8,921
Given to girls 87.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1977 · 133 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 6,158since 1915
Tamar over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,438 | 73 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,362 | 77 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,517 | 70 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #2,510 | 71 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,608 | 66 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #2,779 | 59 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #2,729 | 62 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #2,508 | 70 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,635 | 66 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #2,247 | 85 | #7,157 | 11 |
| 2015 | #2,236 | 84 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #2,010 | 98 | #6,632 | 12 |
| 2013 | #1,866 | 108 | #5,404 | 16 |
| 2012 | #2,115 | 90 | #5,720 | 15 |
| 2011 | #2,274 | 82 | #4,983 | 18 |
| 2010 | #2,691 | 66 | #4,366 | 22 |
| 2009 | #2,614 | 70 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #2,184 | 91 | #3,921 | 26 |
| 2007 | #2,198 | 90 | #4,011 | 25 |
| 2006 | #2,248 | 85 | #5,072 | 17 |
| 2005 | #2,122 | 87 | #4,062 | 22 |
| 2004 | #2,067 | 88 | #4,129 | 21 |
| 2003 | #1,733 | 109 | #3,186 | 29 |
| 2002 | #1,750 | 103 | #3,909 | 21 |
| 2001 | #1,861 | 94 | #3,061 | 29 |
| 2000 | #1,744 | 100 | #2,298 | 42 |
| 1999 | #1,621 | 103 | #2,795 | 30 |
| 1998 | #1,762 | 89 | #2,599 | 32 |
| 1997 | #1,656 | 95 | #3,261 | 22 |
| 1996 | #1,656 | 92 | #3,549 | 19 |
| 1995 | #1,614 | 92 | #3,020 | 23 |
| 1994 | #1,744 | 84 | #3,469 | 19 |
| 1993 | #1,801 | 81 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #1,565 | 99 | #4,114 | 14 |
| 1991 | #1,752 | 82 | #3,224 | 19 |
| 1990 | #1,733 | 84 | #3,058 | 20 |
| 1989 | #1,414 | 105 | #3,618 | 15 |
| 1988 | #1,345 | 106 | #2,860 | 19 |
| 1987 | #1,446 | 90 | #2,468 | 22 |
| 1986 | #1,420 | 90 | #2,891 | 17 |
| 1985 | #1,149 | 124 | #2,828 | 17 |
| 1984 | #1,112 | 124 | #3,925 | 10 |
| 1983 | #1,090 | 126 | #2,493 | 19 |
| 1982 | #1,131 | 124 | #3,108 | 14 |
| 1981 | #1,145 | 119 | #2,569 | 18 |
| 1980 | #1,328 | 95 | #2,444 | 20 |
| 1979 | #1,051 | 132 | #2,777 | 16 |
| 1978 | #1,141 | 112 | #2,068 | 23 |
| 1977 | #1,009 | 133 | #2,665 | 16 |
| 1976 | #1,149 | 101 | #2,054 | 23 |
| 1975 | #1,219 | 94 | #2,540 | 16 |
| 1974 | #1,124 | 103 | #2,799 | 13 |
| 1973 | #1,169 | 93 | #4,054 | 7 |
| 1972 | #1,404 | 70 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #1,292 | 85 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,320 | 80 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #1,385 | 69 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,301 | 72 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,478 | 57 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,225 | 77 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,218 | 78 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,686 | 47 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,598 | 50 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,525 | 54 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,580 | 51 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,561 | 51 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,881 | 35 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,588 | 45 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,067 | 28 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,103 | 27 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,341 | 22 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,295 | 22 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,921 | 14 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,314 | 19 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,589 | 15 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 | — | |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | — | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | — | |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | — | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | — | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | — | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | — | |
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | — | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Tamar! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1915–1937, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Tamar is popular in 1982
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maryland#423 · 1 in 3,184
- New York#593 · 1 in 4,670
- Massachusetts#604 · 1 in 6,514
- New Jersey#642 · 1 in 5,466
- California#752 · 1 in 6,405
Best ever in a state: #404 in New Jersey, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #423 | 7 | 1 in 3,184 |
| New York | #593 | 22 | 1 in 4,670 |
| Massachusetts | #604 | 5 | 1 in 6,514 |
| New Jersey | #642 | 7 | 1 in 5,466 |
| California | #752 | 29 | 1 in 6,405 |
| Pennsylvania | #835 | 7 | 1 in 9,986 |
| Florida | #1,103 | 5 | 1 in 11,341 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tamar
- 76 spots since 2024 (#2,362 → #2,438)
- 341 spots since 2020 (#2,779 → #2,438)
- 202 spots since 2015 (#2,236 → #2,438)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1977 at #1,009 (133 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 33 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 11,527 girls born in 1977 were named Tamar (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,017 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 17.9% of all girls named Tamar (1,103) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5 | #4,274 (1915) | #4,274 |
| 1920s | 10 | #4,570 (1929) | #4,769 |
| 1930s | 41 | #3,145 (1939) | #3,940 |
| 1940s | 96 | #2,410 (1949) | #3,383 |
| 1950s | 249 | #1,588 (1958) | #2,227 |
| 1960s | 606 | #1,218 (1965) | #1,456 |
| 1970s | 1,003 | #1,009 (1977) | #1,188 |
| 1980s | 1,103 | #1,090 (1983) | #1,258 |
| 1990s | 901 | #1,565 (1992) | #1,690 |
| 2000s | 917 | #1,733 (2003) | #2,052 |
| 2010s | 811 | #1,866 (2013) | #2,331 |
| 2020s | 416 | #2,362 (2024) | #2,536 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tamar in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
Top boys' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 13,656 of them was named Tamar, which outranked 90.8% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,126Geraldine125
- #1,126Shemika125
- #1,126Sherika125
- #1,131Tamar124
- #1,131Camilla124
- #1,131Charles124
- #1,131Jewel124
- #1,138Annamarie123
- #1,138Anya123
- #1,138Catalina123
Tied with 6 names at #1,131; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,814,447 boys got a published name in 1982; 1 in 129,603 of them was named Tamar, which outranked 57.8% of the 7,367 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,972Zachari15
- #2,972Zavier15
- #2,972Zebulun15
- #3,108Tamar14
- #3,108Adell14
- #3,108Aleksander14
- #3,108Alen14
- #3,282Acie13
- #3,282Adem13
- #3,282Adriano13
Tied with 173 names at #3,108; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.