Theo
- #5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births
- #82 for boys in 2025, 3,945 births
- Given to boys 91.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2023 · 4,140 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 4 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 35,830since 1880
Theo over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | #82 | 3,945 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | #80 | 4,129 |
| 2023 | #3,640 | 42 | #78 | 4,140 |
| 2022 | #3,220 | 50 | #98 | 3,642 |
| 2021 | #2,674 | 64 | #142 | 2,703 |
| 2020 | #3,450 | 44 | #172 | 2,225 |
| 2019 | #4,437 | 31 | #195 | 2,018 |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | #243 | 1,554 |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | #290 | 1,232 |
| 2016 | #9,411 | 11 | #354 | 952 |
| 2015 | — | #405 | 765 | |
| 2014 | — | #509 | 550 | |
| 2013 | — | #663 | 365 | |
| 2012 | — | #790 | 287 | |
| 2011 | — | #863 | 245 | |
| 2010 | — | #914 | 221 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,032 | 187 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,019 | 188 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,012 | 191 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,116 | 156 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,150 | 139 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,172 | 133 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,291 | 109 | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #1,346 | 98 |
| 2001 | — | #1,460 | 84 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,282 | 101 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,489 | 76 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,642 | 63 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,628 | 62 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,740 | 53 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,623 | 56 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,664 | 54 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,721 | 50 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,510 | 59 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #1,452 | 61 |
| 1990 | — | #1,370 | 66 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,219 | 77 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,145 | 77 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,106 | 75 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,003 | 85 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,057 | 76 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,232 | 23 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,955 | 27 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,734 | 33 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,811 | 31 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,619 | 36 | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #1,532 | 38 |
| 1978 | — | #1,352 | 46 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,245 | 51 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,111 | 58 | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | #1,114 | 57 |
| 1974 | — | #1,546 | 32 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,696 | 27 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,721 | 26 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,862 | 23 | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #1,615 | 28 |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #1,492 | 29 |
| 1968 | — | #1,614 | 24 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,411 | 29 | |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #1,613 | 23 |
| 1965 | — | #1,144 | 43 | |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | #1,236 | 39 |
| 1963 | #4,896 | 8 | #1,375 | 32 |
| 1962 | #3,782 | 12 | #1,546 | 26 |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 | #1,322 | 36 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #1,210 | 42 |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #1,302 | 36 |
| 1958 | #3,747 | 11 | #1,305 | 35 |
| 1957 | #2,563 | 20 | #1,278 | 37 |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | #1,218 | 39 |
| 1955 | #2,280 | 23 | #1,313 | 33 |
| 1954 | #2,779 | 16 | #1,382 | 30 |
| 1953 | #2,516 | 18 | #1,304 | 33 |
| 1952 | #2,502 | 18 | #1,152 | 41 |
| 1951 | #2,391 | 18 | #1,052 | 46 |
| 1950 | #1,679 | 31 | #1,105 | 41 |
| 1949 | #2,069 | 22 | #1,185 | 36 |
| 1948 | #1,621 | 33 | #1,023 | 47 |
| 1947 | #1,602 | 35 | #1,159 | 39 |
| 1946 | #1,583 | 31 | #1,045 | 43 |
| 1945 | #1,080 | 53 | #927 | 48 |
| 1944 | #1,578 | 27 | #974 | 44 |
| 1943 | #1,442 | 33 | #846 | 61 |
| 1942 | #1,630 | 26 | #991 | 45 |
| 1941 | #1,310 | 34 | #1,040 | 39 |
| 1940 | #1,313 | 32 | #1,050 | 38 |
| 1939 | #1,424 | 27 | #754 | 64 |
| 1938 | #1,805 | 19 | #764 | 64 |
| 1937 | #1,255 | 33 | #1,000 | 40 |
| 1936 | #1,321 | 30 | #690 | 73 |
| 1935 | #1,119 | 39 | #725 | 71 |
| 1934 | #1,133 | 39 | #845 | 55 |
| 1933 | #1,123 | 39 | #775 | 62 |
| 1932 | #1,116 | 41 | #708 | 76 |
| 1931 | #1,074 | 43 | #643 | 85 |
| 1930 | #993 | 55 | #645 | 90 |
| 1929 | #842 | 71 | #721 | 75 |
| 1928 | #947 | 62 | #652 | 92 |
| 1927 | #1,000 | 58 | #592 | 109 |
| 1926 | #763 | 90 | #614 | 104 |
| 1925 | #727 | 102 | #641 | 98 |
| 1924 | #705 | 111 | #653 | 97 |
| 1923 | #845 | 75 | #668 | 92 |
| 1922 | #720 | 102 | #617 | 109 |
| 1921 | #747 | 96 | #611 | 107 |
| 1920 | #729 | 98 | #640 | 97 |
| 1919 | #666 | 109 | #633 | 92 |
| 1918 | #702 | 105 | #664 | 87 |
| 1917 | #735 | 91 | #629 | 89 |
| 1916 | #692 | 98 | #593 | 96 |
| 1915 | #667 | 98 | #601 | 91 |
| 1914 | #720 | 64 | #546 | 81 |
| 1913 | #741 | 50 | #550 | 62 |
| 1912 | #689 | 53 | #568 | 50 |
| 1911 | #722 | 36 | #533 | 31 |
| 1910 | #794 | 29 | #461 | 35 |
| 1909 | #580 | 44 | #558 | 22 |
| 1908 | #791 | 24 | #403 | 34 |
| 1907 | #680 | 31 | #429 | 29 |
| 1906 | #707 | 27 | #568 | 17 |
| 1905 | #600 | 34 | #463 | 23 |
| 1904 | #612 | 31 | #401 | 27 |
| 1903 | #607 | 29 | #505 | 18 |
| 1902 | #545 | 35 | #415 | 24 |
| 1901 | #747 | 19 | #453 | 18 |
| 1900 | #780 | 22 | #680 | 14 |
| 1899 | #814 | 16 | #661 | 10 |
| 1898 | #650 | 25 | #523 | 16 |
| 1897 | #567 | 28 | #652 | 11 |
| 1896 | #635 | 24 | #641 | 12 |
| 1895 | #607 | 25 | #556 | 14 |
| 1894 | #719 | 17 | #594 | 12 |
| 1893 | #662 | 19 | #615 | 11 |
| 1892 | #554 | 25 | #748 | 9 |
| 1891 | #572 | 21 | #564 | 11 |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | #566 | 12 |
| 1889 | #600 | 18 | #722 | 8 |
| 1888 | #612 | 17 | #704 | 9 |
| 1887 | #512 | 19 | #583 | 10 |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | #694 | 8 |
| 1885 | #658 | 11 | #700 | 8 |
| 1884 | #520 | 16 | #764 | 7 |
| 1883 | #754 | 7 | #479 | 14 |
| 1882 | #596 | 10 | #540 | 12 |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | #653 | 8 |
| 1880 | #679 | 7 | #640 | 9 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Theo was already there! It came in at #640, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1889, when fewer than 11 boys a year got the name.
Where Theo is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Hawaii#26 · 1 in 127
- Massachusetts#41 · 1 in 196
- Utah#49 · 1 in 237
- Connecticut#51 · 1 in 216
- District of Columbia#55 · 1 in 181
Best ever in a state: #22 in Hawaii, 2022.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #26 | 23 | 1 in 127 |
| Massachusetts | #41 | 138 | 1 in 196 |
| Utah | #49 | 83 | 1 in 237 |
| Connecticut | #51 | 61 | 1 in 216 |
| District of Columbia | #55 | 14 | 1 in 181 |
| Iowa | #57 | 55 | 1 in 251 |
| Wisconsin | #61 | 87 | 1 in 269 |
| New York | #63 | 258 | 1 in 327 |
| New Jersey | #66 | 132 | 1 in 301 |
| Indiana | #69 | 101 | 1 in 313 |
| Illinois | #70 | 154 | 1 in 322 |
| Washington | #71 | 100 | 1 in 328 |
| Oregon | #73 | 49 | 1 in 307 |
| Pennsylvania | #74 | 161 | 1 in 325 |
| California | #76 | 484 | 1 in 363 |
| Florida | #76 | 258 | 1 in 370 |
| Idaho | #76 | 29 | 1 in 298 |
| North Dakota | #77 | 14 | 1 in 240 |
| South Dakota | #77 | 15 | 1 in 256 |
| Oklahoma | #78 | 53 | 1 in 334 |
| Michigan | #81 | 110 | 1 in 365 |
| Delaware | #82 | 12 | 1 in 246 |
| Maine | #82 | 15 | 1 in 256 |
| Maryland | #83 | 63 | 1 in 363 |
| Colorado | #84 | 79 | 1 in 340 |
| Ohio | #88 | 136 | 1 in 386 |
| Missouri | #89 | 71 | 1 in 392 |
| North Carolina | #91 | 133 | 1 in 387 |
| Nevada | #92 | 32 | 1 in 353 |
| Alaska | #94 | 8 | 1 in 284 |
| New Hampshire | #94 | 16 | 1 in 282 |
| Rhode Island | #97 | 11 | 1 in 284 |
| Kentucky | #105 | 51 | 1 in 403 |
| Minnesota | #106 | 59 | 1 in 415 |
| Virginia | #112 | 76 | 1 in 490 |
| Arizona | #115 | 73 | 1 in 448 |
| Tennessee | #118 | 79 | 1 in 465 |
| South Carolina | #120 | 44 | 1 in 482 |
| Georgia | #124 | 94 | 1 in 534 |
| Kansas | #124 | 31 | 1 in 453 |
| Texas | #124 | 315 | 1 in 556 |
| Louisiana | #127 | 39 | 1 in 491 |
| Montana | #127 | 10 | 1 in 376 |
| West Virginia | #127 | 15 | 1 in 411 |
| New Mexico | #134 | 14 | 1 in 464 |
| Nebraska | #136 | 19 | 1 in 464 |
| Arkansas | #151 | 24 | 1 in 524 |
| Mississippi | #201 | 15 | 1 in 722 |
| Alabama | #223 | 25 | 1 in 861 |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Theo
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 2 spots since 2024 (#80 → #82)
- 90 spots since 2020 (#172 → #82)
- Biggest jump: 236 spots in 1938
- Biggest drop: 310 spots in 1937
Rise & fade · boys
143 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2023 at #78 (4,140 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 4 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 4 yrs · run 2022–2025
- Top 1,000: 80 yrs · run 1880–1939
Share of babies · boys
1 in 413
- Highest: 1 in 413 boys born in 2023 were named Theo (0.24%)
- Latest: 1 in 433 boys born in 2025 (0.23%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 58.0% of all boys named Theo (20,784) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1946
- Mostly girls until 1945, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 93 | #479 (1883) | #648 |
| 1890s | 118 | #523 (1898) | #612 |
| 1900s | 226 | #401 (1904) | #488 |
| 1910s | 714 | #461 (1910) | #578 |
| 1920s | 980 | #592 (1927) | #641 |
| 1930s | 680 | #643 (1931) | #755 |
| 1940s | 440 | #846 (1943) | #1,024 |
| 1950s | 371 | #1,052 (1951) | #1,241 |
| 1960s | 323 | #1,144 (1965) | #1,396 |
| 1970s | 386 | #1,111 (1976) | #1,479 |
| 1980s | 540 | #1,003 (1986) | #1,488 |
| 1990s | 600 | #1,370 (1990) | #1,584 |
| 2000s | 1,386 | #1,012 (2007) | #1,188 |
| 2010s | 8,189 | #195 (2019) | #523 |
| 2020s | 20,784 | #78 (2023) | #109 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Theo ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: