Tim
Last seen for girls in 1976 at #9,284 · #3,181 for boys in 2025, 37 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1960 · 6,931 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 8 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 83,358since 1880
Tim over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,181 | 37 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,502 | 54 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,228 | 37 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,533 | 32 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,918 | 42 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,418 | 32 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,364 | 57 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,325 | 57 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,417 | 53 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,066 | 68 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,212 | 61 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,920 | 75 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,424 | 51 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,869 | 41 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,547 | 48 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,069 | 65 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,010 | 69 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,001 | 70 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,861 | 77 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,769 | 78 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,619 | 84 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,989 | 60 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,478 | 88 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,557 | 79 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,502 | 81 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,382 | 91 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,517 | 74 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,680 | 61 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,706 | 57 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,599 | 61 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,736 | 51 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,409 | 69 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,460 | 64 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,281 | 78 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,368 | 68 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,259 | 77 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,064 | 96 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,023 | 92 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,047 | 83 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,075 | 75 | |
| 1985 | — | #901 | 101 | |
| 1984 | — | #784 | 122 | |
| 1983 | — | #895 | 96 | |
| 1982 | — | #747 | 139 | |
| 1981 | — | #679 | 162 | |
| 1980 | — | #675 | 165 | |
| 1979 | — | #702 | 148 | |
| 1978 | — | #523 | 246 | |
| 1977 | — | #520 | 254 | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #459 | 291 |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #436 | 327 |
| 1974 | — | #382 | 410 | |
| 1973 | — | #328 | 523 | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #265 | 733 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #226 | 1,049 |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | #199 | 1,324 |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #181 | 1,544 |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | #139 | 2,073 |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | #116 | 2,624 |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 | #103 | 3,141 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 | #97 | 3,718 |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | #82 | 4,695 |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #79 | 5,016 |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #72 | 5,585 |
| 1961 | #3,608 | 13 | #65 | 6,245 |
| 1960 | #3,512 | 13 | #60 | 6,931 |
| 1959 | #3,436 | 13 | #60 | 6,826 |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | #74 | 5,540 |
| 1957 | #3,489 | 12 | #119 | 3,251 |
| 1956 | — | #174 | 1,717 | |
| 1955 | — | #212 | 1,144 | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #244 | 815 |
| 1953 | — | #254 | 744 | |
| 1952 | — | #260 | 696 | |
| 1951 | — | #250 | 715 | |
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | #241 | 754 |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #201 | 1,007 |
| 1948 | — | #171 | 1,296 | |
| 1947 | — | #170 | 1,330 | |
| 1946 | — | #171 | 1,134 | |
| 1945 | — | #192 | 779 | |
| 1944 | — | #228 | 605 | |
| 1943 | — | #232 | 618 | |
| 1942 | — | #263 | 512 | |
| 1941 | — | #296 | 388 | |
| 1940 | — | #307 | 333 | |
| 1939 | — | #358 | 245 | |
| 1938 | — | #337 | 270 | |
| 1937 | — | #441 | 162 | |
| 1936 | — | #488 | 134 | |
| 1935 | — | #498 | 131 | |
| 1934 | — | #552 | 114 | |
| 1933 | — | #572 | 101 | |
| 1932 | — | #651 | 87 | |
| 1931 | — | #717 | 72 | |
| 1930 | — | #832 | 61 | |
| 1929 | — | #729 | 74 | |
| 1928 | — | #963 | 50 | |
| 1927 | — | #840 | 64 | |
| 1926 | — | #821 | 65 | |
| 1925 | — | #858 | 60 | |
| 1924 | — | #872 | 62 | |
| 1923 | — | #841 | 65 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,010 | 49 | |
| 1921 | — | #953 | 54 | |
| 1920 | — | #846 | 64 | |
| 1919 | — | #877 | 57 | |
| 1918 | — | #796 | 67 | |
| 1917 | — | #919 | 48 | |
| 1916 | — | #834 | 56 | |
| 1915 | — | #996 | 40 | |
| 1914 | — | #687 | 55 | |
| 1913 | — | #777 | 37 | |
| 1912 | — | #713 | 36 | |
| 1911 | — | #644 | 23 | |
| 1910 | — | #474 | 34 | |
| 1909 | — | #462 | 30 | |
| 1908 | — | #553 | 21 | |
| 1907 | — | #559 | 19 | |
| 1906 | — | #613 | 15 | |
| 1905 | — | #525 | 19 | |
| 1904 | — | #612 | 14 | |
| 1903 | — | #393 | 25 | |
| 1902 | — | #507 | 18 | |
| 1901 | — | #779 | 8 | |
| 1900 | — | #490 | 22 | |
| 1899 | — | #548 | 13 | |
| 1898 | — | #635 | 12 | |
| 1897 | — | #852 | 7 | |
| 1896 | — | #551 | 14 | |
| 1895 | — | #529 | 15 | |
| 1894 | — | #787 | 8 | |
| 1893 | — | #419 | 19 | |
| 1892 | — | #597 | 12 | |
| 1891 | — | #456 | 15 | |
| 1890 | — | #434 | 17 | |
| 1889 | — | #498 | 14 | |
| 1888 | — | #648 | 10 | |
| 1887 | — | #392 | 18 | |
| 1886 | — | #491 | 14 | |
| 1885 | — | #462 | 16 | |
| 1884 | — | #468 | 16 | |
| 1883 | — | #448 | 16 | |
| 1882 | — | #576 | 11 | |
| 1881 | — | #503 | 12 | |
| 1880 | — | #526 | 12 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Tim was already there! It came in at #526, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1897, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Tim is popular in 1942
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Idaho#106 · 1 in 484
- Oregon#126 · 1 in 681
- Ohio#126 · 1 in 990
- Montana#140 · 1 in 974
- Colorado#154 · 1 in 967
Best ever in a state: #29 in South Dakota, 1960.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #106 | 10 | 1 in 484 |
| Ohio | #126 | 69 | 1 in 990 |
| Oregon | #126 | 15 | 1 in 681 |
| Montana | #140 | 5 | 1 in 974 |
| California | #154 | 66 | 1 in 1,107 |
| Colorado | #154 | 11 | 1 in 967 |
| Washington | #156 | 16 | 1 in 1,095 |
| Indiana | #161 | 26 | 1 in 1,317 |
| Michigan | #175 | 33 | 1 in 1,755 |
| Minnesota | #184 | 15 | 1 in 1,783 |
| Wisconsin | #197 | 12 | 1 in 2,466 |
| Nebraska | #208 | 6 | 1 in 1,787 |
| Iowa | #227 | 10 | 1 in 2,288 |
| Kansas | #231 | 7 | 1 in 2,184 |
| New Mexico | #232 | 5 | 1 in 1,212 |
| Oklahoma | #233 | 11 | 1 in 1,952 |
| Illinois | #261 | 22 | 1 in 3,359 |
| Missouri | #264 | 11 | 1 in 3,065 |
| North Carolina | #277 | 15 | 1 in 2,776 |
| West Virginia | #296 | 6 | 1 in 3,476 |
| Pennsylvania | #301 | 16 | 1 in 5,826 |
| New Jersey | #307 | 5 | 1 in 7,488 |
| Alabama | #312 | 10 | 1 in 3,269 |
| Texas | #314 | 28 | 1 in 2,516 |
| Tennessee | #347 | 7 | 1 in 4,561 |
| Kentucky | #361 | 7 | 1 in 4,284 |
| South Carolina | #377 | 5 | 1 in 4,757 |
| Virginia | #377 | 6 | 1 in 4,921 |
| Mississippi | #401 | 5 | 1 in 4,743 |
| New York | #441 | 10 | 1 in 11,789 |
| Louisiana | #443 | 5 | 1 in 5,235 |
| Georgia | #478 | 5 | 1 in 7,060 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tim
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 679 spots since 2024 (#2,502 → #3,181)
- 237 spots since 2020 (#3,418 → #3,181)
- 969 spots since 2015 (#2,212 → #3,181)
- Biggest jump: 272 spots in 1902 (#779 → #507)
- Biggest drop: 368 spots in 1894 (#419 → #787)
Rise & fade · boys
80 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1960 at #60 (6,931 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 8 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 8 yrs · run 1958–1965
- Top 1,000: 105 yrs · run 1923–1985
Share of babies · boys
1 in 308
- Highest: 1 in 308 boys born in 1960 were named Tim (0.33%)
- Latest: 1 in 46,164 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1960s
- 49.9% of all boys named Tim (41,572) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 139 | #392 (1887) | #501 |
| 1890s | 132 | #419 (1893) | #581 |
| 1900s | 191 | #393 (1903) | #549 |
| 1910s | 453 | #474 (1910) | #772 |
| 1920s | 607 | #729 (1929) | #873 |
| 1930s | 1,377 | #337 (1938) | #545 |
| 1940s | 8,002 | #170 (1947) | #223 |
| 1950s | 22,202 | #60 (1959) | #189 |
| 1960s | 41,572 | #60 (1960) | #99 |
| 1970s | 5,305 | #199 (1970) | #404 |
| 1980s | 1,131 | #675 (1980) | #889 |
| 1990s | 660 | #1,259 (1990) | #1,502 |
| 2000s | 777 | #1,382 (2000) | #1,717 |
| 2010s | 576 | #1,920 (2014) | #2,321 |
| 2020s | 234 | #2,502 (2024) | #3,130 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tim in 1942
boys
#263
512 births · 1 in 2,698 boys
Top boys' names in 1942
More about 1942
boys
1,381,161 boys got a published name in 1942; 1 in 2,698 of them was named Tim, which outranked 93.5% of the 4,044 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Tim
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 1941
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.