Titus
Last seen for girls in 2016 at #14,331 · #358 for boys in 2025, 910 births
Given to boys >99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2015 · 1,325 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 26,811since 1880
Titus over time
Rank among boys' names. Titus has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #358 | 910 | |
| 2024 | — | #383 | 848 | |
| 2023 | — | #373 | 869 | |
| 2022 | — | #362 | 910 | |
| 2021 | — | #356 | 914 | |
| 2020 | — | #340 | 944 | |
| 2019 | — | #319 | 1,045 | |
| 2018 | — | #309 | 1,100 | |
| 2017 | — | #298 | 1,182 | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | #282 | 1,296 |
| 2015 | — | #280 | 1,325 | |
| 2014 | — | #282 | 1,278 | |
| 2013 | — | #316 | 1,067 | |
| 2012 | — | #358 | 855 | |
| 2011 | — | #362 | 825 | |
| 2010 | — | #396 | 714 | |
| 2009 | — | #436 | 643 | |
| 2008 | — | #442 | 639 | |
| 2007 | — | #495 | 536 | |
| 2006 | — | #548 | 462 | |
| 2005 | — | #536 | 454 | |
| 2004 | — | #570 | 399 | |
| 2003 | — | #606 | 344 | |
| 2002 | — | #596 | 343 | |
| 2001 | — | #587 | 341 | |
| 2000 | — | #628 | 293 | |
| 1999 | — | #698 | 240 | |
| 1998 | — | #783 | 196 | |
| 1997 | — | #869 | 161 | |
| 1996 | — | #871 | 158 | |
| 1995 | — | #903 | 148 | |
| 1994 | — | #905 | 145 | |
| 1993 | — | #992 | 120 | |
| 1992 | — | #825 | 163 | |
| 1991 | — | #915 | 132 | |
| 1990 | — | #876 | 138 | |
| 1989 | — | #825 | 145 | |
| 1988 | — | #759 | 155 | |
| 1987 | — | #827 | 127 | |
| 1986 | — | #792 | 131 | |
| 1985 | — | #764 | 134 | |
| 1984 | — | #699 | 156 | |
| 1983 | — | #668 | 164 | |
| 1982 | — | #683 | 160 | |
| 1981 | — | #687 | 158 | |
| 1980 | — | #792 | 122 | |
| 1979 | — | #751 | 133 | |
| 1978 | — | #754 | 126 | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #710 | 143 |
| 1976 | — | #756 | 120 | |
| 1975 | — | #783 | 112 | |
| 1974 | — | #747 | 118 | |
| 1973 | — | #885 | 81 | |
| 1972 | — | #877 | 84 | |
| 1971 | — | #893 | 83 | |
| 1970 | — | #968 | 69 | |
| 1969 | — | #989 | 60 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,034 | 51 | |
| 1967 | — | #986 | 54 | |
| 1966 | — | #901 | 64 | |
| 1965 | — | #809 | 83 | |
| 1964 | — | #875 | 76 | |
| 1963 | — | #880 | 72 | |
| 1962 | — | #939 | 65 | |
| 1961 | — | #980 | 62 | |
| 1960 | — | #892 | 72 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,068 | 52 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,148 | 45 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,117 | 47 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,171 | 42 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,339 | 32 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,068 | 49 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,261 | 35 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,547 | 24 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,430 | 27 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,272 | 32 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,409 | 27 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,430 | 26 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,449 | 26 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,475 | 23 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,494 | 20 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,438 | 22 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,308 | 28 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,496 | 22 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,276 | 27 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,251 | 29 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,425 | 22 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,521 | 20 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,288 | 27 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,587 | 18 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,708 | 17 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,461 | 22 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,251 | 28 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,198 | 32 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,333 | 27 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,235 | 33 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,272 | 31 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,147 | 38 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,603 | 23 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,661 | 21 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,279 | 32 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,492 | 26 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,420 | 27 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,434 | 27 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,412 | 28 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,073 | 43 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,247 | 32 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,211 | 33 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,152 | 34 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,335 | 26 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,265 | 27 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,545 | 16 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,365 | 15 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,137 | 17 | |
| 1911 | — | #896 | 14 | |
| 1910 | — | #928 | 12 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,440 | 5 | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #1,200 | 6 | |
| 1906 | — | #927 | 8 | |
| 1905 | — | #699 | 12 | |
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | #1,013 | 6 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | #1,002 | 6 | |
| 1897 | — | #787 | 8 | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | #978 | 6 | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #1,066 | 5 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #959 | 5 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | #892 | 5 | |
| 1882 | — | #754 | 7 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #809 | 6 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Titus was already there! It came in at #809, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Titus is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#145 · 1 in 480
- Idaho#154 · 1 in 525
- Nebraska#161 · 1 in 579
- Montana#178 · 1 in 556
- Alaska#206 · 1 in 690
Best ever in a state: #72 in Alaska, 2014.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #145 | 10 | 1 in 480 |
| Idaho | #154 | 16 | 1 in 525 |
| Nebraska | #161 | 17 | 1 in 579 |
| Montana | #178 | 7 | 1 in 556 |
| Alaska | #206 | 5 | 1 in 690 |
| West Virginia | #234 | 7 | 1 in 1,152 |
| Iowa | #236 | 16 | 1 in 955 |
| Kansas | #238 | 17 | 1 in 962 |
| Oregon | #238 | 19 | 1 in 964 |
| Missouri | #240 | 29 | 1 in 1,126 |
| Oklahoma | #241 | 21 | 1 in 980 |
| Kentucky | #275 | 15 | 1 in 1,499 |
| North Carolina | #277 | 35 | 1 in 1,473 |
| Minnesota | #293 | 19 | 1 in 1,458 |
| Alabama | #295 | 15 | 1 in 1,557 |
| South Carolina | #298 | 14 | 1 in 1,504 |
| Washington | #305 | 24 | 1 in 1,482 |
| Colorado | #315 | 19 | 1 in 1,448 |
| Tennessee | #317 | 21 | 1 in 1,674 |
| New Mexico | #341 | 6 | 1 in 1,670 |
| Georgia | #355 | 28 | 1 in 1,996 |
| Virginia | #355 | 20 | 1 in 2,078 |
| Arkansas | #370 | 8 | 1 in 1,804 |
| Indiana | #385 | 16 | 1 in 2,259 |
| Arizona | #391 | 17 | 1 in 2,193 |
| Ohio | #401 | 22 | 1 in 2,751 |
| Michigan | #430 | 18 | 1 in 2,677 |
| Texas | #457 | 59 | 1 in 3,027 |
| Illinois | #476 | 23 | 1 in 3,036 |
| Wisconsin | #478 | 9 | 1 in 3,084 |
| California | #500 | 61 | 1 in 3,832 |
| Louisiana | #513 | 9 | 1 in 2,647 |
| Mississippi | #517 | 5 | 1 in 2,765 |
| Utah | #522 | 7 | 1 in 3,153 |
| Maryland | #537 | 8 | 1 in 3,525 |
| Pennsylvania | #571 | 14 | 1 in 4,357 |
| Florida | #623 | 21 | 1 in 4,411 |
| New Jersey | #944 | 5 | 1 in 8,561 |
| New York | #1,142 | 10 | 1 in 10,623 |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Titus
- 25 spots since 2024 (#383 → #358)
- 18 spots since 2020 (#340 → #358)
- 78 spots since 2015 (#280 → #358)
- Biggest jump: 512 spots in 1910 (#1,440 → #928)
- Biggest drop: 273 spots in 1907 (#927 → #1,200)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2015 at #280 (1,325 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 76 yrs · run 1969–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,447 boys born in 2015 were named Titus (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,877 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
- 39.9% of all boys named Titus (10,687) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 29 | #754 (1882) | #852 |
| 1890s | 25 | #787 (1897) | #958 |
| 1900s | 37 | #699 (1905) | #1,056 |
| 1910s | 226 | #896 (1911) | #1,208 |
| 1920s | 296 | #1,073 (1920) | #1,379 |
| 1930s | 246 | #1,198 (1932) | #1,401 |
| 1940s | 250 | #1,251 (1940) | #1,403 |
| 1950s | 385 | #1,068 (1959) | #1,242 |
| 1960s | 659 | #809 (1965) | #929 |
| 1970s | 1,069 | #710 (1977) | #812 |
| 1980s | 1,452 | #668 (1983) | #750 |
| 1990s | 1,601 | #698 (1999) | #864 |
| 2000s | 4,454 | #436 (2009) | #544 |
| 2010s | 10,687 | #280 (2015) | #320 |
| 2020s | 5,395 | #340 (2020) | #362 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Titus in 2010
Top boys' names in 2010
More about 2010
boys
1,918,676 boys got a published name in 2010; 1 in 2,687 of them was named Titus, which outranked 97.2% of the 14,270 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.