Tyler
#1,911 for girls in 2025, 101 births · #219 for boys in 2025, 1,633 births
Given to boys 97.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1994 · 30,482 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 36 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 603,970since 1880
Tyler over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,911 | 101 | #219 | 1,633 |
| 2024 | #1,591 | 132 | #191 | 1,915 |
| 2023 | #1,614 | 129 | #177 | 2,073 |
| 2022 | #1,590 | 133 | #163 | 2,268 |
| 2021 | #1,460 | 147 | #157 | 2,444 |
| 2020 | #1,503 | 142 | #130 | 2,801 |
| 2019 | #1,465 | 150 | #127 | 3,024 |
| 2018 | #1,371 | 164 | #119 | 3,341 |
| 2017 | #1,311 | 178 | #105 | 3,788 |
| 2016 | #1,271 | 191 | #91 | 4,515 |
| 2015 | #1,223 | 202 | #81 | 5,175 |
| 2014 | #1,368 | 170 | #72 | 5,851 |
| 2013 | #1,347 | 173 | #63 | 6,660 |
| 2012 | #1,334 | 176 | #50 | 7,706 |
| 2011 | #1,292 | 182 | #38 | 8,851 |
| 2010 | #1,223 | 197 | #34 | 10,458 |
| 2009 | #1,063 | 240 | #28 | 11,551 |
| 2008 | #1,014 | 260 | #28 | 12,709 |
| 2007 | #873 | 320 | #21 | 14,106 |
| 2006 | #734 | 380 | #18 | 15,550 |
| 2005 | #751 | 357 | #16 | 16,989 |
| 2004 | #577 | 491 | #16 | 17,450 |
| 2003 | #599 | 456 | #15 | 18,185 |
| 2002 | #525 | 523 | #14 | 18,266 |
| 2001 | #490 | 569 | #13 | 19,275 |
| 2000 | #415 | 683 | #10 | 21,506 |
| 1999 | #371 | 788 | #10 | 22,669 |
| 1998 | #355 | 810 | #8 | 23,712 |
| 1997 | #363 | 760 | #10 | 24,879 |
| 1996 | #333 | 849 | #7 | 26,956 |
| 1995 | #303 | 917 | #6 | 29,161 |
| 1994 | #266 | 1,054 | #5 | 30,482 |
| 1993 | #238 | 1,182 | #5 | 29,800 |
| 1992 | #282 | 978 | #8 | 28,806 |
| 1991 | #403 | 634 | #16 | 25,209 |
| 1990 | #535 | 445 | #21 | 20,646 |
| 1989 | #726 | 272 | #30 | 15,594 |
| 1988 | #713 | 263 | #33 | 13,349 |
| 1987 | #718 | 252 | #39 | 11,542 |
| 1986 | #837 | 199 | #40 | 10,912 |
| 1985 | #833 | 195 | #43 | 10,211 |
| 1984 | #829 | 190 | #47 | 8,705 |
| 1983 | #1,049 | 132 | #57 | 5,821 |
| 1982 | #1,064 | 135 | #66 | 4,577 |
| 1981 | #1,382 | 89 | #96 | 3,117 |
| 1980 | #1,805 | 60 | #114 | 2,623 |
| 1979 | #1,814 | 59 | #131 | 2,044 |
| 1978 | #1,841 | 54 | #150 | 1,752 |
| 1977 | #2,257 | 40 | #165 | 1,452 |
| 1976 | #2,099 | 41 | #179 | 1,260 |
| 1975 | #2,196 | 38 | #205 | 1,056 |
| 1974 | #2,683 | 27 | #227 | 922 |
| 1973 | #3,122 | 21 | #260 | 748 |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | #250 | 832 |
| 1971 | #3,266 | 20 | #286 | 721 |
| 1970 | #2,856 | 24 | #283 | 749 |
| 1969 | #3,012 | 20 | #357 | 490 |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | #372 | 435 |
| 1967 | #3,340 | 15 | #366 | 420 |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | #418 | 330 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #450 | 297 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 | #454 | 309 |
| 1963 | #4,896 | 8 | #469 | 282 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #522 | 231 |
| 1961 | — | #558 | 197 | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #585 | 177 |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | #641 | 145 |
| 1958 | — | #640 | 145 | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | #648 | 141 |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #657 | 133 |
| 1955 | — | #676 | 117 | |
| 1954 | — | #666 | 117 | |
| 1953 | — | #707 | 101 | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #770 | 83 |
| 1951 | — | #833 | 71 | |
| 1950 | — | #771 | 79 | |
| 1949 | — | #814 | 71 | |
| 1948 | — | #824 | 68 | |
| 1947 | — | #842 | 67 | |
| 1946 | — | #925 | 52 | |
| 1945 | — | #986 | 42 | |
| 1944 | — | #991 | 43 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,088 | 39 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,193 | 34 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,004 | 41 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,107 | 35 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,015 | 39 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,125 | 33 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,576 | 19 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,062 | 12 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,326 | 26 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,860 | 15 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,707 | 17 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,426 | 24 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,538 | 21 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,368 | 28 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,731 | 19 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #1,353 | 29 |
| 1927 | — | #1,436 | 27 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,661 | 21 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,628 | 22 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,675 | 22 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,551 | 24 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,222 | 35 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,509 | 25 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,323 | 30 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,264 | 31 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,373 | 27 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,362 | 26 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,304 | 27 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,454 | 22 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,608 | 15 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,497 | 13 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,000 | 21 | |
| 1911 | — | #925 | 13 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,193 | 8 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #1,113 | 7 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | #1,091 | 6 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,205 | 5 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,009 | 6 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | #1,121 | 5 | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #982 | 6 | |
| 1895 | — | #1,079 | 5 | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #1,066 | 5 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | #789 | 7 | |
| 1888 | — | #1,031 | 5 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #971 | 5 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #745 | 7 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Tyler was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1888, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Tyler is popular in 1963
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Washington#211 · 1 in 1,604
- Utah#217 · 1 in 1,418
- Wisconsin#278 · 1 in 4,396
- Minnesota#301 · 1 in 4,838
- Connecticut#309 · 1 in 5,214
Best ever in a state: #1 in South Dakota, 1990.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | #211 | 18 | 1 in 1,604 |
| Utah | #217 | 8 | 1 in 1,418 |
| Wisconsin | #278 | 10 | 1 in 4,396 |
| Minnesota | #301 | 8 | 1 in 4,838 |
| Connecticut | #309 | 5 | 1 in 5,214 |
| Colorado | #317 | 7 | 1 in 2,989 |
| Oklahoma | #329 | 7 | 1 in 3,219 |
| Massachusetts | #341 | 6 | 1 in 9,135 |
| Missouri | #374 | 8 | 1 in 5,573 |
| Indiana | #381 | 8 | 1 in 6,412 |
| Pennsylvania | #389 | 14 | 1 in 7,791 |
| Illinois | #404 | 18 | 1 in 5,990 |
| California | #407 | 41 | 1 in 4,580 |
| Ohio | #408 | 13 | 1 in 7,943 |
| Michigan | #421 | 10 | 1 in 8,602 |
| Louisiana | #425 | 9 | 1 in 4,402 |
| Virginia | #443 | 6 | 1 in 7,188 |
| Tennessee | #447 | 5 | 1 in 7,625 |
| New Jersey | #505 | 5 | 1 in 12,363 |
| Florida | #509 | 7 | 1 in 7,639 |
| Georgia | #536 | 5 | 1 in 9,398 |
| North Carolina | #543 | 5 | 1 in 10,086 |
| New York | #564 | 14 | 1 in 12,467 |
| Texas | #751 | 9 | 1 in 12,814 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tyler
- 28 spots since 2024 (#191 → #219)
- 89 spots since 2020 (#130 → #219)
- 138 spots since 2015 (#81 → #219)
- Biggest jump: 268 spots in 1911 (#1,193 → #925)
- Biggest drop: 497 spots in 1913 (#1,000 → #1,497)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1994 at #5 (30,482 births)
- Births halved by 2007, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: 9 yrs · run 1992–2000
- Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1981–2016
- Top 1,000: 89 yrs · run 1944–2025
- Highest: 1 in 63 boys born in 1994 were named Tyler (1.6%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,046 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
- 43.4% of all boys named Tyler (262,320) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 24 | #745 (1880) | #884 |
| 1890s | 26 | #982 (1896) | #1,060 |
| 1900s | 40 | #785 (1900) | #1,091 |
| 1910s | 203 | #925 (1911) | #1,298 |
| 1920s | 254 | #1,222 (1922) | #1,509 |
| 1930s | 234 | #1,015 (1939) | #1,500 |
| 1940s | 492 | #814 (1949) | #977 |
| 1950s | 1,132 | #640 (1958) | #701 |
| 1960s | 3,168 | #357 (1969) | #455 |
| 1970s | 11,536 | #131 (1979) | #214 |
| 1980s | 86,451 | #30 (1989) | #57 |
| 1990s | 262,320 | #5 (1994) | #10 |
| 2000s | 165,587 | #10 (2000) | #18 |
| 2010s | 59,369 | #34 (2010) | #78 |
| 2020s | 13,134 | #130 (2020) | #173 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tyler in 1963
Top girls' names in 1963
Top boys' names in 1963
More about 1963
girls
1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 240,938 of them was named Tyler, which outranked 36.1% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
2,031,078 boys got a published name in 1963; 1 in 7,202 of them was named Tyler, which outranked 89.9% of the 4,621 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #466Reynaldo286
- #467Gerardo285
- #467Grady285
- #469Tyler282
- #469Rodolfo282
- #469Stan282
- #469Ward282
- #474Gilberto280
- #474Owen280
- #476Cornelius279
Tied with 4 names at #469; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.