Tyshawn
Last seen for girls in 2003 at #13,844 · #3,314 for boys in 2025, 35 births
Given to boys 97.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2003 · 207 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 5,266since 1972
Tyshawn over time
Rank among boys' names. Tyshawn has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,314 | 35 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,394 | 34 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,614 | 50 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,648 | 50 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,253 | 62 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,046 | 69 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,292 | 60 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,856 | 81 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,977 | 72 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,863 | 80 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,780 | 85 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,701 | 89 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,528 | 105 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,376 | 122 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,209 | 145 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,012 | 193 | |
| 2009 | — | #998 | 197 | |
| 2008 | — | #915 | 224 | |
| 2007 | — | #981 | 200 | |
| 2006 | — | #895 | 218 | |
| 2005 | — | #909 | 195 | |
| 2004 | — | #934 | 181 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #840 | 207 |
| 2002 | — | #886 | 184 | |
| 2001 | — | #882 | 178 | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #880 | 179 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #896 | 168 |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #888 | 164 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #878 | 158 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #860 | 161 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #943 | 139 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #955 | 133 |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | #914 | 139 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #931 | 131 |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #999 | 115 |
| 1990 | — | #1,111 | 93 | |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #1,258 | 74 |
| 1988 | — | #1,404 | 55 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #1,400 | 52 |
| 1986 | — | #1,242 | 60 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,333 | 52 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,098 | 25 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #1,594 | 37 |
| 1982 | — | #1,929 | 28 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,942 | 28 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,726 | 33 | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #2,310 | 21 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #2,205 | 21 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #2,063 | 23 |
| 1976 | — | #2,329 | 19 | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | #2,361 | 18 |
| 1974 | — | #5,227 | 5 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,013 | 11 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Tyshawn! It came in at #3,622, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1974, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Tyshawn is popular in 2017
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Indiana#915 · 1 in 6,890
- North Carolina#938 · 1 in 7,332
- Illinois#1,180 · 1 in 10,322
- New York#1,304 · 1 in 12,194
Best ever in a state: #228 in South Carolina, 2010.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #915 | 5 | 1 in 6,890 |
| North Carolina | #938 | 7 | 1 in 7,332 |
| Illinois | #1,180 | 6 | 1 in 10,322 |
| New York | #1,304 | 8 | 1 in 12,194 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Tyshawn
- 80 spots since 2024 (#3,394 → #3,314)
- 1,268 spots since 2020 (#2,046 → #3,314)
- 1,534 spots since 2015 (#1,780 → #3,314)
- Biggest jump: 112 spots in 1991 (#1,111 → #999)
- Biggest drop: 94 spots in 2004 (#840 → #934)
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2003 at #840 (207 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 1991–2009
- Highest: 1 in 9,108 boys born in 2008 were named Tyshawn (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 48,802 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #840 in 2003, was only 1 in 9,543 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.3% of all boys named Tyshawn (1,963) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 126 | #2,063 (1977) | #2,891 |
| 1980s | 444 | #1,242 (1986) | #1,593 |
| 1990s | 1,401 | #860 (1996) | #938 |
| 2000s | 1,963 | #840 (2003) | #912 |
| 2010s | 1,032 | #1,012 (2010) | #1,659 |
| 2020s | 300 | #2,046 (2020) | #2,712 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Tyshawn in 2017
Top boys' names in 2017
More about 2017
boys
1,850,956 boys got a published name in 2017; 1 in 25,708 of them was named Tyshawn, which outranked 86.1% of the 14,262 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,958Valen73
- #1,958Woodrow73
- #1,958Zyler73
- #1,977Tyshawn72
- #1,977Alexandro72
- #1,977Carlton72
- #1,977Deonte72
- #2,003Alexandre71
- #2,003Brooklyn71
- #2,003Conley71
Tied with 25 names at #1,977; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.