Vance
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #10,386 · #1,075 for boys in 2025, 200 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1969 · 555 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 27,012since 1880
Vance over time
Rank among boys' names. Vance has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,075 | 200 | |
| 2024 | — | #993 | 226 | |
| 2023 | — | #952 | 237 | |
| 2022 | — | #982 | 229 | |
| 2021 | — | #933 | 242 | |
| 2020 | — | #972 | 221 | |
| 2019 | — | #890 | 245 | |
| 2018 | — | #946 | 220 | |
| 2017 | — | #836 | 265 | |
| 2016 | — | #882 | 248 | |
| 2015 | — | #757 | 318 | |
| 2014 | — | #881 | 246 | |
| 2013 | — | #867 | 245 | |
| 2012 | — | #842 | 255 | |
| 2011 | — | #754 | 300 | |
| 2010 | — | #772 | 289 | |
| 2009 | — | #776 | 294 | |
| 2008 | — | #767 | 290 | |
| 2007 | — | #721 | 318 | |
| 2006 | — | #724 | 298 | |
| 2005 | — | #760 | 261 | |
| 2004 | — | #784 | 231 | |
| 2003 | — | #744 | 242 | |
| 2002 | — | #839 | 198 | |
| 2001 | — | #918 | 170 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,035 | 141 | |
| 1999 | — | #905 | 165 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,008 | 135 | |
| 1997 | — | #828 | 175 | |
| 1996 | — | #856 | 162 | |
| 1995 | — | #847 | 162 | |
| 1994 | — | #772 | 186 | |
| 1993 | — | #702 | 218 | |
| 1992 | — | #673 | 237 | |
| 1991 | — | #652 | 243 | |
| 1990 | — | #646 | 246 | |
| 1989 | — | #609 | 262 | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #602 | 244 |
| 1987 | — | #628 | 212 | |
| 1986 | — | #710 | 162 | |
| 1985 | — | #691 | 162 | |
| 1984 | — | #685 | 160 | |
| 1983 | — | #609 | 198 | |
| 1982 | — | #668 | 171 | |
| 1981 | — | #703 | 152 | |
| 1980 | — | #705 | 152 | |
| 1979 | — | #671 | 162 | |
| 1978 | — | #636 | 172 | |
| 1977 | — | #706 | 145 | |
| 1976 | — | #556 | 209 | |
| 1975 | — | #628 | 166 | |
| 1974 | — | #603 | 176 | |
| 1973 | — | #492 | 250 | |
| 1972 | — | #526 | 226 | |
| 1971 | — | #445 | 340 | |
| 1970 | — | #398 | 407 | |
| 1969 | — | #328 | 555 | |
| 1968 | — | #424 | 332 | |
| 1967 | — | #445 | 288 | |
| 1966 | — | #443 | 299 | |
| 1965 | — | #401 | 384 | |
| 1964 | #6,009 | 6 | #396 | 406 |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #372 | 457 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #389 | 431 |
| 1961 | — | #369 | 463 | |
| 1960 | — | #373 | 450 | |
| 1959 | — | #391 | 411 | |
| 1958 | — | #402 | 376 | |
| 1957 | — | #352 | 462 | |
| 1956 | — | #399 | 359 | |
| 1955 | — | #410 | 321 | |
| 1954 | — | #432 | 279 | |
| 1953 | — | #373 | 338 | |
| 1952 | — | #391 | 309 | |
| 1951 | — | #387 | 304 | |
| 1950 | — | #417 | 261 | |
| 1949 | — | #415 | 267 | |
| 1948 | — | #425 | 249 | |
| 1947 | — | #409 | 281 | |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | #424 | 224 |
| 1945 | — | #417 | 208 | |
| 1944 | — | #443 | 189 | |
| 1943 | — | #479 | 166 | |
| 1942 | — | #500 | 150 | |
| 1941 | — | #439 | 176 | |
| 1940 | — | #451 | 165 | |
| 1939 | — | #469 | 149 | |
| 1938 | — | #470 | 152 | |
| 1937 | — | #487 | 137 | |
| 1936 | — | #433 | 166 | |
| 1935 | — | #474 | 143 | |
| 1934 | — | #434 | 168 | |
| 1933 | — | #457 | 146 | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #496 | 134 |
| 1931 | — | #461 | 150 | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | #476 | 156 |
| 1929 | — | #491 | 142 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #449 | 180 |
| 1927 | — | #467 | 168 | |
| 1926 | #4,851 | 5 | #460 | 171 |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #440 | 186 |
| 1924 | — | #506 | 152 | |
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | #473 | 166 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | #426 | 199 |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | #480 | 164 |
| 1920 | #3,340 | 9 | #408 | 207 |
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | #477 | 158 |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | #422 | 190 |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 | #404 | 196 |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | #421 | 177 |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 | #485 | 132 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #410 | 134 |
| 1913 | — | #415 | 108 | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #468 | 71 |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | #481 | 37 |
| 1910 | — | #512 | 30 | |
| 1909 | — | #378 | 40 | |
| 1908 | — | #438 | 30 | |
| 1907 | — | #559 | 19 | |
| 1906 | — | #523 | 19 | |
| 1905 | — | #421 | 26 | |
| 1904 | — | #492 | 19 | |
| 1903 | — | #393 | 25 | |
| 1902 | — | #426 | 23 | |
| 1901 | — | #559 | 13 | |
| 1900 | — | #649 | 15 | |
| 1899 | — | #502 | 15 | |
| 1898 | — | #505 | 17 | |
| 1897 | — | #615 | 12 | |
| 1896 | — | #481 | 18 | |
| 1895 | — | #368 | 26 | |
| 1894 | — | #419 | 20 | |
| 1893 | #1,437 | 5 | #419 | 19 |
| 1892 | — | #458 | 18 | |
| 1891 | — | #397 | 19 | |
| 1890 | — | #533 | 13 | |
| 1889 | — | #549 | 12 | |
| 1888 | — | #815 | 7 | |
| 1887 | — | #583 | 10 | |
| 1886 | — | #647 | 9 | |
| 1885 | — | #547 | 12 | |
| 1884 | — | #520 | 13 | |
| 1883 | — | #644 | 9 | |
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | #706 | 7 | |
| 1880 | — | #745 | 7 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Vance was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Vance is popular in 1928
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Carolina#175 · 1 in 1,108
- Tennessee#210 · 1 in 1,859
- Kansas#259 · 1 in 2,471
- Indiana#271 · 1 in 3,651
- South Carolina#294 · 1 in 2,622
Best ever in a state: #126 in Wyoming, 1951.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #175 | 31 | 1 in 1,108 |
| Tennessee | #210 | 13 | 1 in 1,859 |
| Kansas | #259 | 6 | 1 in 2,471 |
| Indiana | #271 | 7 | 1 in 3,651 |
| South Carolina | #294 | 7 | 1 in 2,622 |
| Michigan | #311 | 9 | 1 in 4,643 |
| Minnesota | #323 | 5 | 1 in 4,098 |
| Pennsylvania | #335 | 13 | 1 in 6,464 |
| Virginia | #354 | 6 | 1 in 3,768 |
| Arkansas | #357 | 5 | 1 in 3,372 |
| New York | #618 | 5 | 1 in 19,570 |
| Texas | #710 | 7 | 1 in 8,290 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Vance
- 82 spots since 2024 (#993 → #1,075)
- 103 spots since 2020 (#972 → #1,075)
- 318 spots since 2015 (#757 → #1,075)
- Biggest jump: 299 spots in 1883 (#943 → #644)
- Biggest drop: 237 spots in 1882 (#706 → #943)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1969 at #328 (555 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1880–1997
- Highest: 1 in 3,222 boys born in 1969 were named Vance (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,540 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 15.0% of all boys named Vance (4,065) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 91 | #520 (1884) | #670 |
| 1890s | 177 | #368 (1895) | #470 |
| 1900s | 229 | #378 (1909) | #484 |
| 1910s | 1,233 | #404 (1917) | #450 |
| 1920s | 1,735 | #408 (1920) | #460 |
| 1930s | 1,501 | #433 (1936) | #466 |
| 1940s | 2,075 | #409 (1947) | #440 |
| 1950s | 3,420 | #352 (1957) | #395 |
| 1960s | 4,065 | #328 (1969) | #394 |
| 1970s | 2,253 | #398 (1970) | #566 |
| 1980s | 1,875 | #602 (1988) | #661 |
| 1990s | 1,929 | #646 (1990) | #789 |
| 2000s | 2,443 | #721 (2007) | #807 |
| 2010s | 2,631 | #754 (2011) | #843 |
| 2020s | 1,355 | #933 (2021) | #985 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Vance in 1928
Top girls' names in 1928
Top boys' names in 1928
More about 1928
girls
1,153,318 girls got a published name in 1928; 1 in 230,664 of them was named Vance, which outranked 13.1% of the 5,440 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 715 names at #4,725; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,107,613 boys got a published name in 1928; 1 in 6,153 of them was named Vance, which outranked 90.5% of the 4,723 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.