Veda

#738 for girls in 2025, 370 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #12,145
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1901 · 52 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
14,071
since 1881

Veda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Veda has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201933peak #414, 1901girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#738370—
2024#692410—
2023#815342—
2022#889313—
2021#871313—
2020#918283—
2019#849316#12,1455
2018#893302—
2017#856319—
2016#883319—
2015#937289—
2014#1,118227—
2013#1,138211—
2012#1,326177—
2011#1,189202—
2010#1,456155—
2009#1,676133—
2008#1,685132—
2007#2,10196—
2006#2,45975—
2005#1,95098—
2004#2,55665—
2003#2,57762—
2002#2,37967—
2001#2,92449—
2000#2,50860—
1999#2,73750—
1998#4,02328—
1997#3,62631—
1996#2,96640—
1995#4,09925—
1994#4,23824—
1993#3,15836—
1992#5,05119—
1991#7,98710—
1990#5,28617—
1989#6,95511—
1988——
1987#4,12220—
1986#4,53917—
1985#6,45710—
1984#4,16618—
1983#3,80620—
1982#3,34425—
1981#3,14727—
1980#3,31825—
1979#3,66821—
1978#2,51634—
1977#3,61220—
1976#2,79227—
1975#2,68028—
1974#2,43331—
1973#1,97941—
1972#2,17335—
1971#1,54663—
1970#1,82848—
1969#1,63554—
1968#1,47359—
1967#1,23974—
1966#1,21378—
1965#1,25673—
1964#1,078102—
1963#1,026108—
1962#1,074101—
1961#1,005116—
1960#943128—
1959#965119—
1958#933122—
1957#1,06795—
1956#969108—
1955#1,11879—
1954#831128—
1953#906107—
1952#95496—
1951#96193—
1950#90097—
1949#93091—
1948#720137—
1947#650164—
1946#562200—
1945#82483—
1944#96465—
1943#96567—
1942#84482—
1941#87170—
1940#79080—
1939#84868—
1938#72489—
1937#70095—
1936#66299—
1935#654101—
1934#607118—
1933#637106—
1932#68897—
1931#67897—
1930#615126—
1929#571143—
1928#602137—
1927#587145—
1926#544166—
1925#553169—
1924#560167—
1923#566162—
1922#552166—
1921#518188—
1920#497193—
1919#534164—
1918#545167—
1917#510169—
1916#491171—
1915#476168—
1914#515118—
1913#491107—
1912#476101—
1911#48274—
1910#50365—
1909#50056—
1908#46460—
1907#46659—
1906#47751—
1905#45854—
1904#52040—
1903#44252—
1902#42952—
1901#41452—
1900#46852—
1899#41450—
1898#44846—
1897#44044—
1896#47837—
1895#44041—
1894#51631—
1893#61422—
1892#57923—
1891#62418—
1890#49927—
1889#58919—
1888#48626—
1887#56016—
1886#8288—
1885#52017—
1884#7319—
1883——
1882#9085—
1881#7406—
1880——
First appearance
1881

The first year at least five girls were named Veda! It came in at #740, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Veda is popular in 1933

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMNIllinois: #500 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,020 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedSDIowa: #319 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,445 girlsIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNEMissouri: #272 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,017 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: #277 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,056 girlsWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedKSArkansas: #297 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,833 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #307 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,988 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedHITexas: #647 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,056 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Veda, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Missouri#272 · 1 in 2,017
  2. West Virginia#277 · 1 in 2,056
  3. Arkansas#297 · 1 in 1,833
  4. Oklahoma#307 · 1 in 1,988
  5. Iowa#319 · 1 in 3,445

Best ever in a state: #117 in South Dakota, 2018.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Missouri#272131 in 2,017
West Virginia#27781 in 2,056
Arkansas#297101 in 1,833
Oklahoma#307111 in 1,988
Iowa#31951 in 3,445
Illinois#50061 in 8,020
Texas#64791 in 6,056
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Veda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 46 spots since 2024 (#692 → #738)
  • 180 spots since 2020 (#918 → #738)
  • 199 spots since 2015 (#937 → #738)
  • Biggest jump: 268 spots in 1887 (#828 → #560)
  • Biggest drop: 308 spots in 1886 (#520 → #828)
Rise & fade · girls
20 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1881
  • Peaked 1901 at #414 (52 births)
  • Births halved by 1977, 76 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 88 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 88 yrs · run 1884–1954
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,952
  • Highest: 1 in 3,952 girls born in 2024 were named Veda (0.03%)
  • Latest: 1 in 4,344 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #414 in 1901, was only 1 in 4,603 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 17.9% of all girls named Veda (2,517) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s106#486 (1888)#670
1890s339#414 (1899)#505
1900s528#414 (1901)#464
1910s1,304#476 (1915)#502
1920s1,636#497 (1920)#555
1930s996#607 (1934)#681
1940s1,039#562 (1946)#812
1950s1,044#831 (1954)#960
1960s893#943 (1960)#1,194
1970s348#1,546 (1971)#2,523
1980s173#3,147 (1981)#4,428
1990s280#2,737 (1999)#4,317
2000s837#1,676 (2009)#2,282
2010s2,517#849 (2019)#1,065
2020s2,031#692 (2024)#821

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Veda in 1933

girls
#637
106 births · 1 in 9,509 girls

Top girls' names in 1933

  1. #1Mary55,517
  2. #2Betty31,531
  3. #3Barbara26,949
  4. #4Dorothy22,054
  5. #5Joan19,294
  6. #6Patricia18,632
  7. #7Margaret15,241
  8. #8Helen14,644
  9. #9Shirley14,320
  10. #10Doris12,025
  11. #637Veda106
More about 1933

girls

1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 9,509 of them was named Veda, which outranked 86.9% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Veda
  1. #633Margot107
  2. #633Sydney107
  3. #633Tina107
  4. #637Veda106
  5. #637Gertie106
  6. #637Rhea106
  7. #637Stephanie106
  8. #642Celeste105
  9. #642Lavern105
  10. #642Yvette105

Tied with 4 names at #637; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,022Rheta#1,754 → #732
  2. ↑ 930Joellen#1,877 → #947
  3. ↑ 583Veola#1,568 → #985
  4. ↑ 483Sharlene#1,162 → #679
  5. ↑ 475Louetta#1,448 → #973
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Golda#969 → #1,364
  2. ↓ 322Louis#940 → #1,262
  3. ↓ 298Bebe#899 → #1,197
  4. ↓ 291Clyde#998 → #1,289
  5. ↓ 291Mariam#998 → #1,289

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1933 →