Velma
#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1955 at #2,558
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1912 · 1,403 births
- Debut · girls
- 16 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 14 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 86,752since 1880
Velma over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | — | |
| 2024 | #7,967 | 13 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,549 | 22 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,172 | 25 | — | |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | — | |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 | — | |
| 2019 | #7,716 | 14 | — | |
| 2018 | #5,785 | 21 | — | |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | — | |
| 2016 | #12,876 | 7 | — | |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | — | |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | — | |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | — | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | — | |
| 2011 | #7,783 | 15 | — | |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 | — | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | — | |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | — | |
| 2003 | #9,048 | 11 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,444 | 14 | — | |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | — | |
| 2000 | #8,027 | 12 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | — | |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | — | |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | — | |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 | — | |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,886 | 40 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,297 | 33 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,253 | 32 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,803 | 37 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,493 | 41 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,344 | 43 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,704 | 35 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,018 | 50 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,887 | 55 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,850 | 58 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,455 | 83 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,518 | 78 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,503 | 78 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,397 | 83 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,451 | 76 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,191 | 95 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,229 | 93 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,070 | 110 | — | |
| 1973 | #933 | 131 | — | |
| 1972 | #993 | 120 | — | |
| 1971 | #828 | 167 | — | |
| 1970 | #781 | 181 | — | |
| 1969 | #731 | 191 | — | |
| 1968 | #651 | 222 | — | |
| 1967 | #577 | 273 | — | |
| 1966 | #546 | 299 | — | |
| 1965 | #499 | 362 | — | |
| 1964 | #487 | 395 | — | |
| 1963 | #478 | 407 | — | |
| 1962 | #445 | 464 | — | |
| 1961 | #428 | 524 | — | |
| 1960 | #406 | 559 | — | |
| 1959 | #400 | 550 | — | |
| 1958 | #416 | 502 | — | |
| 1957 | #352 | 668 | — | |
| 1956 | #332 | 692 | — | |
| 1955 | #338 | 634 | #2,558 | 10 |
| 1954 | #309 | 749 | #3,827 | 5 |
| 1953 | #304 | 737 | — | |
| 1952 | #300 | 706 | — | |
| 1951 | #277 | 798 | — | |
| 1950 | #267 | 825 | — | |
| 1949 | #272 | 798 | #3,298 | 6 |
| 1948 | #254 | 871 | — | |
| 1947 | #259 | 848 | — | |
| 1946 | #242 | 875 | #3,173 | 6 |
| 1945 | #223 | 861 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #211 | 935 | #2,195 | 11 |
| 1943 | #201 | 1,046 | — | |
| 1942 | #196 | 1,052 | — | |
| 1941 | #188 | 1,000 | — | |
| 1940 | #188 | 986 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | #178 | 1,068 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #174 | 1,160 | #2,326 | 10 |
| 1937 | #164 | 1,218 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #167 | 1,180 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | #147 | 1,352 | #2,029 | 13 |
| 1934 | #144 | 1,426 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1933 | #137 | 1,481 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #133 | 1,689 | #1,465 | 23 |
| 1931 | #131 | 1,758 | #2,471 | 10 |
| 1930 | #127 | 1,918 | #1,964 | 15 |
| 1929 | #128 | 1,930 | #2,096 | 14 |
| 1928 | #114 | 2,290 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1927 | #118 | 2,285 | #2,523 | 11 |
| 1926 | #124 | 2,120 | #1,846 | 18 |
| 1925 | #128 | 2,177 | #1,628 | 22 |
| 1924 | #123 | 2,272 | #1,776 | 20 |
| 1923 | #116 | 2,337 | #2,446 | 12 |
| 1922 | #113 | 2,367 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #108 | 2,606 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #105 | 2,491 | #1,885 | 18 |
| 1919 | #104 | 2,341 | #1,576 | 22 |
| 1918 | #103 | 2,439 | #2,260 | 13 |
| 1917 | #98 | 2,411 | #2,423 | 11 |
| 1916 | #99 | 2,319 | #2,389 | 11 |
| 1915 | #94 | 2,287 | #2,184 | 12 |
| 1914 | #92 | 1,795 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #89 | 1,556 | #1,441 | 14 |
| 1912 | #88 | 1,403 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | #90 | 1,045 | #1,290 | 8 |
| 1910 | #90 | 1,035 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #92 | 857 | #1,083 | 8 |
| 1908 | #90 | 860 | #1,217 | 6 |
| 1907 | #90 | 854 | #1,200 | 6 |
| 1906 | #94 | 721 | — | |
| 1905 | #94 | 722 | — | |
| 1904 | #101 | 615 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #99 | 589 | — | |
| 1902 | #113 | 526 | — | |
| 1901 | #130 | 388 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #141 | 426 | — | |
| 1899 | #139 | 334 | — | |
| 1898 | #152 | 331 | — | |
| 1897 | #160 | 280 | — | |
| 1896 | #174 | 249 | — | |
| 1895 | #188 | 208 | — | |
| 1894 | #189 | 196 | — | |
| 1893 | #201 | 156 | — | |
| 1892 | #212 | 146 | — | |
| 1891 | #236 | 103 | — | |
| 1890 | #254 | 96 | — | |
| 1889 | #281 | 72 | — | |
| 1888 | #286 | 67 | — | |
| 1887 | #274 | 59 | — | |
| 1886 | #371 | 33 | — | |
| 1885 | #354 | 32 | — | |
| 1884 | #479 | 18 | — | |
| 1883 | #366 | 25 | — | |
| 1882 | #446 | 17 | — | |
| 1881 | #384 | 19 | — | |
| 1880 | #421 | 16 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Velma was already there! It came in at #421, and was given to 16 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2007–2008, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Velma is popular in 1926
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#31 · 1 in 161
- Kansas#42 · 1 in 187
- Missouri#47 · 1 in 215
- Arkansas#54 · 1 in 229
- Louisiana#62 · 1 in 229
Best ever in a state: #12 in Kansas, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #31 | 155 | 1 in 161 |
| Kansas | #42 | 82 | 1 in 187 |
| Missouri | #47 | 141 | 1 in 215 |
| Arkansas | #54 | 90 | 1 in 229 |
| Louisiana | #62 | 104 | 1 in 229 |
| Idaho | #67 | 15 | 1 in 234 |
| Mississippi | #67 | 83 | 1 in 286 |
| Iowa | #72 | 72 | 1 in 276 |
| Nebraska | #73 | 41 | 1 in 276 |
| Wyoming | #73 | 6 | 1 in 252 |
| Texas | #81 | 165 | 1 in 362 |
| Alabama | #85 | 97 | 1 in 335 |
| Colorado | #86 | 27 | 1 in 307 |
| Montana | #86 | 12 | 1 in 315 |
| Tennessee | #90 | 74 | 1 in 367 |
| Oregon | #93 | 15 | 1 in 375 |
| Indiana | #94 | 64 | 1 in 408 |
| South Dakota | #98 | 17 | 1 in 347 |
| Washington | #113 | 20 | 1 in 477 |
| Illinois | #115 | 101 | 1 in 590 |
| Kentucky | #122 | 57 | 1 in 500 |
| Arizona | #125 | 9 | 1 in 431 |
| Maine | #126 | 12 | 1 in 541 |
| Ohio | #126 | 84 | 1 in 647 |
| Utah | #126 | 10 | 1 in 483 |
| North Carolina | #127 | 71 | 1 in 541 |
| West Virginia | #130 | 37 | 1 in 539 |
| Michigan | #133 | 54 | 1 in 758 |
| Georgia | #136 | 51 | 1 in 622 |
| California | #137 | 60 | 1 in 602 |
| Virginia | #139 | 39 | 1 in 668 |
| Florida | #147 | 27 | 1 in 620 |
| Wisconsin | #154 | 24 | 1 in 988 |
| Minnesota | #158 | 21 | 1 in 1,033 |
| New Mexico | #167 | 7 | 1 in 565 |
| Pennsylvania | #168 | 81 | 1 in 1,130 |
| North Dakota | #174 | 7 | 1 in 897 |
| South Carolina | #198 | 18 | 1 in 1,219 |
| Maryland | #199 | 9 | 1 in 1,504 |
| New York | #279 | 33 | 1 in 2,987 |
| Massachusetts | #280 | 9 | 1 in 3,856 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Velma
- 2,245 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #5,722)
- 1,490 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #5,722)
- 8,760 spots since 2015 (#14,482 → #5,722)
- Biggest jump: 125 spots in 1885 (#479 → #354)
- Biggest drop: 165 spots in 1972 (#828 → #993)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1912 at #88 (1,403 births)
- Births halved by 1955, 43 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1905–1917
- Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
- Highest: 1 in 373 girls born in 1907 were named Velma (0.27%)
- Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #88 in 1912, was only 1 in 398 (0.25%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 26.4% of all girls named Velma (22,875) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 358 | #274 (1887) | #366 |
| 1890s | 2,099 | #139 (1899) | #191 |
| 1900s | 6,558 | #90 (1908) | #104 |
| 1910s | 18,631 | #88 (1912) | #95 |
| 1920s | 22,875 | #105 (1920) | #118 |
| 1930s | 14,250 | #127 (1930) | #150 |
| 1940s | 9,272 | #188 (1941) | #223 |
| 1950s | 6,861 | #267 (1950) | #330 |
| 1960s | 3,696 | #406 (1960) | #525 |
| 1970s | 1,134 | #781 (1970) | #1,138 |
| 1980s | 512 | #1,455 (1981) | #2,233 |
| 1990s | 191 | #2,886 (1991) | #5,734 |
| 2000s | 97 | #7,444 (2002) | #11,060 |
| 2010s | 107 | #5,785 (2018) | #10,786 |
| 2020s | 111 | #5,172 (2022) | #6,479 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Velma in 1926
Top girls' names in 1926
Top boys' names in 1926
More about 1926
girls
1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 559 of them was named Velma, which outranked 97.8% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
- ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
- ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
- ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
- ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,110,505 boys got a published name in 1926; 1 in 61,695 of them was named Velma, which outranked 61.8% of the 4,837 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,787Wilborn19
- #1,787Yale19
- #1,787Yutaka19
- #1,846Velma18
- #1,846Arsenio18
- #1,846Audry18
- #1,846Bentley18
- #1,911Alban17
- #1,911Alf17
- #1,911Almond17
Tied with 64 names at #1,846; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 531Okey#984 → #1,515
- ↓ 459Florentino#973 → #1,432
- ↓ 407Rexford#924 → #1,331
- ↓ 380Marshal#973 → #1,353
- ↓ 378Coolidge#746 → #1,124
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.