Velma

#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1955 at #2,558
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1912 · 1,403 births
Debut · girls
16 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
86,752
since 1880

Velma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201941peak #88, 1912girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#5,72221—
2024#7,96713—
2023#5,54922—
2022#5,17225—
2021#7,25015—
2020#7,21215—
2019#7,71614—
2018#5,78521—
2017#11,6158—
2016#12,8767—
2015#14,4826—
2014#8,48513—
2013#11,0009—
2012#16,8695—
2011#7,78315—
2010#11,2469—
2009#10,67910—
2008#15,4056—
2007#17,6365—
2006#11,4179—
2005#13,0107—
2004#7,82814—
2003#9,04811—
2002#7,44414—
2001#10,1029—
2000#8,02712—
1999#7,71612—
1998#6,07316—
1997#7,74211—
1996#7,13012—
1995#6,64113—
1994#5,01619—
1993#4,82620—
1992#6,00815—
1991#2,88640—
1990#3,29733—
1989#3,25332—
1988#2,80337—
1987#2,49341—
1986#2,34443—
1985#2,70435—
1984#2,01850—
1983#1,88755—
1982#1,85058—
1981#1,45583—
1980#1,51878—
1979#1,50378—
1978#1,39783—
1977#1,45176—
1976#1,19195—
1975#1,22993—
1974#1,070110—
1973#933131—
1972#993120—
1971#828167—
1970#781181—
1969#731191—
1968#651222—
1967#577273—
1966#546299—
1965#499362—
1964#487395—
1963#478407—
1962#445464—
1961#428524—
1960#406559—
1959#400550—
1958#416502—
1957#352668—
1956#332692—
1955#338634#2,55810
1954#309749#3,8275
1953#304737—
1952#300706—
1951#277798—
1950#267825—
1949#272798#3,2986
1948#254871—
1947#259848—
1946#242875#3,1736
1945#223861#2,7437
1944#211935#2,19511
1943#2011,046—
1942#1961,052—
1941#1881,000—
1940#188986#2,6718
1939#1781,068#3,4805
1938#1741,160#2,32610
1937#1641,218#3,5185
1936#1671,180#2,18411
1935#1471,352#2,02913
1934#1441,426#2,5639
1933#1371,481#2,7388
1932#1331,689#1,46523
1931#1311,758#2,47110
1930#1271,918#1,96415
1929#1281,930#2,09614
1928#1142,290#2,27013
1927#1182,285#2,52311
1926#1242,120#1,84618
1925#1282,177#1,62822
1924#1232,272#1,77620
1923#1162,337#2,44612
1922#1132,367#2,80110
1921#1082,606#3,5177
1920#1052,491#1,88518
1919#1042,341#1,57622
1918#1032,439#2,26013
1917#982,411#2,42311
1916#992,319#2,38911
1915#942,287#2,18412
1914#921,795#2,4578
1913#891,556#1,44114
1912#881,403#2,5445
1911#901,045#1,2908
1910#901,035#1,1938
1909#92857#1,0838
1908#90860#1,2176
1907#90854#1,2006
1906#94721—
1905#94722—
1904#101615#1,0646
1903#99589—
1902#113526—
1901#130388#1,0585
1900#141426—
1899#139334—
1898#152331—
1897#160280—
1896#174249—
1895#188208—
1894#189196—
1893#201156—
1892#212146—
1891#236103—
1890#25496—
1889#28172—
1888#28667—
1887#27459—
1886#37133—
1885#35432—
1884#47918—
1883#36625—
1882#44617—
1881#38419—
1880#42116—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Velma was already there! It came in at #421, and was given to 16 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2007–2008, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.

Where Velma is popular in 1941

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWAIdaho: #150 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 729 girlsIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #227 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,910 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #231 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 2,176 girlsMINew York: #495 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 8,038 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #161 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 923 girlsSDIowa: #173 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,270 girlsIAIndiana: #182 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,439 girlsINOhio: #209 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,786 girlsOHPennsylvania: #234 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 2,182 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #276 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 2,065 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedUTColorado: #170 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 828 girlsCONebraska: #226 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,798 girlsNEMissouri: #104 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 562 girlsMOKentucky: #166 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 894 girlsKYWest Virginia: #161 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 890 girlsWVVirginia: #179 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 966 girlsVAMaryland: #246 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,104 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedDEArizona: #120 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 422 girlsAZNew Mexico: #179 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 733 girlsNMKansas: #125 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 673 girlsKSArkansas: #72 for girls · 61 births · 1 in 322 girlsARTennessee: #103 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 498 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #137 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 610 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #280 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,046 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #79 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 375 girlsOKLouisiana: #119 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 475 girlsLAMississippi: #93 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 361 girlsMSAlabama: #161 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 725 girlsALGeorgia: #237 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,415 girlsGAHawaii: #138 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 449 girlsHITexas: #143 for girls · 101 births · 1 in 631 girlsTXFlorida: #197 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,011 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Arkansas#72 · 1 in 322
  2. Oklahoma#79 · 1 in 375
  3. Mississippi#93 · 1 in 361
  4. Tennessee#103 · 1 in 498
  5. Missouri#104 · 1 in 562

Best ever in a state: #12 in Kansas, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Arkansas#72611 in 322
Oklahoma#79541 in 375
Mississippi#93641 in 361
Tennessee#103591 in 498
Missouri#104531 in 562
Louisiana#119521 in 475
Arizona#120121 in 422
Kansas#125191 in 673
North Carolina#137641 in 610
Hawaii#13881 in 449
Texas#1431011 in 631
Idaho#15061 in 729
Alabama#161411 in 725
South Dakota#16151 in 923
West Virginia#161221 in 890
Kentucky#166321 in 894
Colorado#170111 in 828
Iowa#173161 in 1,270
New Mexico#17981 in 733
Virginia#179271 in 966
Indiana#182201 in 1,439
Florida#197161 in 1,011
Ohio#209321 in 1,786
Nebraska#22651 in 1,798
Illinois#227321 in 1,910
Michigan#231221 in 2,176
Pennsylvania#234361 in 2,182
Georgia#237231 in 1,415
Maryland#24671 in 2,104
California#276271 in 2,065
South Carolina#280111 in 2,046
New York#495121 in 8,038
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Velma
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 2,245 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #5,722)
  • 1,490 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #5,722)
  • 8,760 spots since 2015 (#14,482 → #5,722)
  • Biggest jump: 125 spots in 1885 (#479 → #354)
  • Biggest drop: 165 spots in 1972 (#828 → #993)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1912 at #88 (1,403 births)
  • Births halved by 1955, 43 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1905–1917
  • Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 373
  • Highest: 1 in 373 girls born in 1907 were named Velma (0.27%)
  • Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #88 in 1912, was only 1 in 398 (0.25%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 26.4% of all girls named Velma (22,875) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s358#274 (1887)#366
1890s2,099#139 (1899)#191
1900s6,558#90 (1908)#104
1910s18,631#88 (1912)#95
1920s22,875#105 (1920)#118
1930s14,250#127 (1930)#150
1940s9,272#188 (1941)#223
1950s6,861#267 (1950)#330
1960s3,696#406 (1960)#525
1970s1,134#781 (1970)#1,138
1980s512#1,455 (1981)#2,233
1990s191#2,886 (1991)#5,734
2000s97#7,444 (2002)#11,060
2010s107#5,785 (2018)#10,786
2020s111#5,172 (2022)#6,479

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Velma in 1941

girls
#188
1,000 births · 1 in 1,208 girls

Top girls' names in 1941

  1. #1Mary58,048
  2. #2Barbara39,543
  3. #3Patricia36,905
  4. #4Carol24,187
  5. #5Linda23,721
  6. #6Judith23,320
  7. #7Betty20,905
  8. #8Nancy20,885
  9. #9Sandra19,500
  10. #10Shirley16,954
  11. #188Velma1,000
More about 1941

girls

1,208,119 girls got a published name in 1941; 1 in 1,208 of them was named Velma, which outranked 96.3% of the 5,085 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Velma
  1. #185Claudia1,019
  2. #186Cora1,007
  3. #186Gayle1,007
  4. #188Velma1,000
  5. #189Leona998
  6. #190Gertrude997
  7. #191Mae993
Biggest movers since 1940
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,130Jerilyn#2,737 → #607
  2. ↑ 1,258Trina#2,109 → #851
  3. ↑ 372Karan#1,347 → #975
  4. ↑ 371Kristine#1,313 → #942
  5. ↑ 356Sherri#1,186 → #830
Fallers
  1. ↓ 447Kenneth#971 → #1,418
  2. ↓ 421Janna#997 → #1,418
  3. ↓ 366Beatriz#989 → #1,355
  4. ↓ 338Merna#997 → #1,335
  5. ↓ 337Eldora#957 → #1,294

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1941 →