Velma

#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1955 at #2,558
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1912 · 1,403 births
Debut · girls
16 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
86,752
since 1880

Velma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201961peak #88, 1912girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#5,72221—
2024#7,96713—
2023#5,54922—
2022#5,17225—
2021#7,25015—
2020#7,21215—
2019#7,71614—
2018#5,78521—
2017#11,6158—
2016#12,8767—
2015#14,4826—
2014#8,48513—
2013#11,0009—
2012#16,8695—
2011#7,78315—
2010#11,2469—
2009#10,67910—
2008#15,4056—
2007#17,6365—
2006#11,4179—
2005#13,0107—
2004#7,82814—
2003#9,04811—
2002#7,44414—
2001#10,1029—
2000#8,02712—
1999#7,71612—
1998#6,07316—
1997#7,74211—
1996#7,13012—
1995#6,64113—
1994#5,01619—
1993#4,82620—
1992#6,00815—
1991#2,88640—
1990#3,29733—
1989#3,25332—
1988#2,80337—
1987#2,49341—
1986#2,34443—
1985#2,70435—
1984#2,01850—
1983#1,88755—
1982#1,85058—
1981#1,45583—
1980#1,51878—
1979#1,50378—
1978#1,39783—
1977#1,45176—
1976#1,19195—
1975#1,22993—
1974#1,070110—
1973#933131—
1972#993120—
1971#828167—
1970#781181—
1969#731191—
1968#651222—
1967#577273—
1966#546299—
1965#499362—
1964#487395—
1963#478407—
1962#445464—
1961#428524—
1960#406559—
1959#400550—
1958#416502—
1957#352668—
1956#332692—
1955#338634#2,55810
1954#309749#3,8275
1953#304737—
1952#300706—
1951#277798—
1950#267825—
1949#272798#3,2986
1948#254871—
1947#259848—
1946#242875#3,1736
1945#223861#2,7437
1944#211935#2,19511
1943#2011,046—
1942#1961,052—
1941#1881,000—
1940#188986#2,6718
1939#1781,068#3,4805
1938#1741,160#2,32610
1937#1641,218#3,5185
1936#1671,180#2,18411
1935#1471,352#2,02913
1934#1441,426#2,5639
1933#1371,481#2,7388
1932#1331,689#1,46523
1931#1311,758#2,47110
1930#1271,918#1,96415
1929#1281,930#2,09614
1928#1142,290#2,27013
1927#1182,285#2,52311
1926#1242,120#1,84618
1925#1282,177#1,62822
1924#1232,272#1,77620
1923#1162,337#2,44612
1922#1132,367#2,80110
1921#1082,606#3,5177
1920#1052,491#1,88518
1919#1042,341#1,57622
1918#1032,439#2,26013
1917#982,411#2,42311
1916#992,319#2,38911
1915#942,287#2,18412
1914#921,795#2,4578
1913#891,556#1,44114
1912#881,403#2,5445
1911#901,045#1,2908
1910#901,035#1,1938
1909#92857#1,0838
1908#90860#1,2176
1907#90854#1,2006
1906#94721—
1905#94722—
1904#101615#1,0646
1903#99589—
1902#113526—
1901#130388#1,0585
1900#141426—
1899#139334—
1898#152331—
1897#160280—
1896#174249—
1895#188208—
1894#189196—
1893#201156—
1892#212146—
1891#236103—
1890#25496—
1889#28172—
1888#28667—
1887#27459—
1886#37133—
1885#35432—
1884#47918—
1883#36625—
1882#44617—
1881#38419—
1880#42116—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Velma was already there! It came in at #421, and was given to 16 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2007–2008, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.

Where Velma is popular in 1961

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #442 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 4,265 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #750 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 12,411 girlsMINew York: #691 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 9,881 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedINOhio: #489 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,791 girlsOHPennsylvania: #621 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 10,095 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #595 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 6,039 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #412 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,027 girlsMOKentucky: #550 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,378 girlsKYWest Virginia: #345 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,803 girlsWVVirginia: #301 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,231 girlsVAMaryland: #381 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,369 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedDEArizona: #372 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,193 girlsAZNew Mexico: #328 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,708 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedKSArkansas: #204 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,029 girlsARTennessee: #304 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,414 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #280 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,806 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #274 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,621 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #439 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,475 girlsOKLouisiana: #246 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,409 girlsLAMississippi: #127 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 564 girlsMSAlabama: #282 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,808 girlsALGeorgia: #280 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,782 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Velma, so not publishedHITexas: #237 for girls · 94 births · 1 in 1,189 girlsTXFlorida: #330 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 2,276 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#127 · 1 in 564
  2. Arkansas#204 · 1 in 1,029
  3. Texas#237 · 1 in 1,189
  4. Louisiana#246 · 1 in 1,409
  5. South Carolina#274 · 1 in 1,621

Best ever in a state: #12 in Kansas, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#127441 in 564
Arkansas#204171 in 1,029
Texas#237941 in 1,189
Louisiana#246271 in 1,409
South Carolina#274161 in 1,621
Georgia#280251 in 1,782
North Carolina#280271 in 1,806
Alabama#282191 in 1,808
Virginia#301181 in 2,231
Tennessee#304151 in 2,414
New Mexico#32871 in 1,708
Florida#330221 in 2,276
West Virginia#34561 in 2,803
Arizona#37271 in 2,193
Maryland#38191 in 3,369
Missouri#412111 in 4,027
Oklahoma#43961 in 3,475
Illinois#442251 in 4,265
Ohio#489181 in 5,791
Kentucky#55051 in 6,378
California#595291 in 6,039
Pennsylvania#621111 in 10,095
New York#691171 in 9,881
Michigan#75071 in 12,411
Alaska———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Velma
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 2,245 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #5,722)
  • 1,490 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #5,722)
  • 8,760 spots since 2015 (#14,482 → #5,722)
  • Biggest jump: 125 spots in 1885 (#479 → #354)
  • Biggest drop: 165 spots in 1972 (#828 → #993)
Rise & fade · girls
32 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1912 at #88 (1,403 births)
  • Births halved by 1955, 43 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1905–1917
  • Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 373
  • Highest: 1 in 373 girls born in 1907 were named Velma (0.27%)
  • Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #88 in 1912, was only 1 in 398 (0.25%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 26.4% of all girls named Velma (22,875) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s358#274 (1887)#366
1890s2,099#139 (1899)#191
1900s6,558#90 (1908)#104
1910s18,631#88 (1912)#95
1920s22,875#105 (1920)#118
1930s14,250#127 (1930)#150
1940s9,272#188 (1941)#223
1950s6,861#267 (1950)#330
1960s3,696#406 (1960)#525
1970s1,134#781 (1970)#1,138
1980s512#1,455 (1981)#2,233
1990s191#2,886 (1991)#5,734
2000s97#7,444 (2002)#11,060
2010s107#5,785 (2018)#10,786
2020s111#5,172 (2022)#6,479

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Velma in 1961

girls
#428
524 births · 1 in 3,852 girls

Top girls' names in 1961

  1. #1Mary47,682
  2. #2Lisa42,720
  3. #3Susan37,532
  4. #4Linda35,597
  5. #5Karen34,707
  6. #6Patricia28,889
  7. #7Donna28,679
  8. #8Cynthia24,393
  9. #9Sandra24,153
  10. #10Deborah24,107
  11. #428Velma524
More about 1961

girls

2,018,495 girls got a published name in 1961; 1 in 3,852 of them was named Velma, which outranked 94.3% of the 7,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Velma
  1. #424Mindy536
  2. #426Celia532
  3. #427Christie528
  4. #428Velma524
  5. #429Rena523
  6. #430Suzette521
  7. #431Sondra517
Biggest movers since 1960
Risers
  1. ↑ 997Corinna#1,811 → #814
  2. ↑ 789Sabra#1,637 → #848
  3. ↑ 745Velvet#1,286 → #541
  4. ↑ 601Johnna#1,043 → #442
  5. ↑ 600Damita#1,597 → #997
Fallers
  1. ↓ 317Sheena#980 → #1,297
  2. ↓ 253Lita#909 → #1,162
  3. ↓ 241Jannette#970 → #1,211
  4. ↓ 229Francisca#939 → #1,168
  5. ↓ 214Andra#822 → #1,036

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1961 →