Verna

#3,459 for girls in 2025, 44 births · Last seen for boys in 1978 at #5,772
Given to girls 99.2% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1906 · 533 births
Debut · girls
46 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
69,113
since 1880

Verna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Verna has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201910peak #117, 1906girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,45944—
2024#4,89327—
2023#5,12625—
2022#3,89338—
2021#5,23724—
2020#4,54829—
2019#5,04126—
2018#3,91837—
2017#4,06636—
2016#3,58843—
2015#5,28825—
2014#3,92538—
2013#4,42232—
2012#5,25326—
2011#4,80729—
2010#6,18221—
2009#7,67916—
2008#4,08938—
2007#5,23027—
2006#4,68530—
2005#4,70428—
2004#4,38731—
2003#4,10932—
2002#4,49827—
2001#4,02531—
2000#3,80833—
1999#3,71832—
1998#3,11640—
1997#4,66022—
1996#4,73921—
1995#3,78028—
1994#2,70145—
1993#2,82542—
1992#3,58130—
1991#2,88640—
1990#3,22734—
1989#2,61843—
1988#2,59741—
1987#2,53140—
1986#2,42041—
1985#2,28344—
1984#2,14946—
1983#1,60869—
1982#1,51079—
1981#1,52878—
1980#1,90456—
1979#1,64568—
1978#1,51174#5,7725
1977#1,44077—
1976#1,16099—
1975#1,127103—
1974#1,094106—
1973#1,009117—
1972#863149—
1971#796177—
1970#755195#3,8367
1969#682213—
1968#711188#4,1365
1967#572274—
1966#562286—
1965#576274—
1964#522354#3,6016
1963#514359#3,3187
1962#478410#4,0335
1961#454465#3,6526
1960#420532—
1959#420509#3,9885
1958#392546—
1957#369605#3,0248
1956#355606#3,5356
1955#346617#2,55810
1954#358584—
1953#320652#3,7985
1952#316655—
1951#303667#2,49510
1950#292719#3,3296
1949#284736#2,6069
1948#293681#3,6685
1947#276777#3,7335
1946#265742—
1945#253719#2,5748
1944#243734#3,4305
1943#222881#2,7328
1942#222871#3,5605
1941#207862—
1940#204865#2,4789
1939#190927—
1938#197927#2,4799
1937#192934#1,91314
1936#189950#2,6298
1935#181979#2,9517
1934#1771,040#2,39310
1933#1681,078#2,09312
1932#1651,175#1,92215
1931#1541,213#2,00314
1930#1511,359#2,44411
1929#1561,342#2,31712
1928#1521,458#2,27013
1927#1531,535#1,95917
1926#1521,586#1,72020
1925#1531,613#2,08915
1924#1531,661#2,47312
1923#1461,713#2,61411
1922#1461,693#1,69521
1921#1411,813#1,90418
1920#1351,851#2,13115
1919#1311,816#1,75219
1918#1251,873#2,39812
1917#1241,799#3,9815
1916#1251,713#1,84916
1915#1261,570#1,96814
1914#1251,226#2,2719
1913#1261,038#2,0928
1912#126914—
1911#132639#1,3877
1910#130626—
1909#122582#1,2776
1908#123549—
1907#123538—
1906#117533—
1905#129488#1,0916
1904#136429#1,2055
1903#131424—
1902#129436#8628
1901#138361#9436
1900#143412—
1899#143329—
1898#128410—
1897#138350—
1896#143326—
1895#140326—
1894#138310—
1893#142292—
1892#157246—
1891#166203—
1890#145244—
1889#168174—
1888#175165—
1887#176129—
1886#174134—
1885#176108—
1884#19987—
1883#163103#8925
1882#18076—
1881#28630—
1880#22746—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Verna was already there! It came in at #227, and was given to 46 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2009–2010, when fewer than 22 girls a year got the name.

Where Verna is popular in 1910

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedAKMaine: #81 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 256 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #46 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 154 girlsMNIllinois: #105 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 525 girlsILWisconsin: #49 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 194 girlsWIMichigan: #121 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 542 girlsMINew York: #225 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,908 girlsNYMassachusetts: #207 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,106 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #72 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 221 girlsSDIowa: #98 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 408 girlsIAIndiana: #95 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 411 girlsINOhio: #103 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 516 girlsOHPennsylvania: #79 for girls · 82 births · 1 in 385 girlsPANew Jersey: #155 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 961 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #112 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 458 girlsCAUtah: #77 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 210 girlsUTColorado: #80 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 275 girlsCONebraska: #85 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 318 girlsNEMissouri: #101 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 405 girlsMOKentucky: #117 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 484 girlsKYWest Virginia: #115 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 440 girlsWVVirginia: #187 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,197 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedNMKansas: #104 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 435 girlsKSArkansas: #134 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 503 girlsARTennessee: #143 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 582 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #177 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 970 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #208 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,337 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #127 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 455 girlsOKLouisiana: #228 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,214 girlsLAMississippi: #226 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,163 girlsMSAlabama: #168 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 873 girlsALGeorgia: #197 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,200 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedHITexas: #140 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 522 girlsTXFlorida: #128 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 503 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Minnesota#46 · 1 in 154
  2. Wisconsin#49 · 1 in 194
  3. South Dakota#72 · 1 in 221
  4. Utah#77 · 1 in 210
  5. Pennsylvania#79 · 1 in 385

Best ever in a state: #24 in Nevada, 1916.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Minnesota#46381 in 154
Wisconsin#49351 in 194
South Dakota#7281 in 221
Utah#7751 in 210
Pennsylvania#79821 in 385
Colorado#8091 in 275
Maine#8171 in 256
Nebraska#85111 in 318
Indiana#95181 in 411
Iowa#98141 in 408
Missouri#101271 in 405
Ohio#103291 in 516
Kansas#104111 in 435
Illinois#105351 in 525
California#112131 in 458
West Virginia#115131 in 440
Kentucky#117221 in 484
Michigan#121161 in 542
Oklahoma#127161 in 455
Florida#12881 in 503
Arkansas#134151 in 503
Texas#140371 in 522
Tennessee#143181 in 582
New Jersey#15591 in 961
Alabama#168151 in 873
North Carolina#177131 in 970
Virginia#18791 in 1,197
Georgia#197131 in 1,200
Massachusetts#20751 in 2,106
South Carolina#20871 in 1,337
New York#225171 in 1,908
Mississippi#22691 in 1,163
Louisiana#22881 in 1,214
Alaska———
Arizona———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maryland———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Verna
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 1,434 spots since 2024 (#4,893 → #3,459)
  • 1,089 spots since 2020 (#4,548 → #3,459)
  • 1,829 spots since 2015 (#5,288 → #3,459)
  • Biggest jump: 106 spots in 1882 (#286 → #180)
  • Biggest drop: 146 spots in 1973 (#863 → #1,009)
Rise & fade · girls
26 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1906 at #117 (533 births)
  • Births halved by 1968, 62 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 93 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 93 yrs · run 1880–1972
Share of babies · girls
1 in 554
  • Highest: 1 in 554 girls born in 1906 were named Verna (0.18%)
  • Latest: 1 in 36,529 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 23.5% of all girls named Verna (16,265) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,052#163 (1883)#192
1890s3,036#128 (1898)#144
1900s4,752#117 (1906)#129
1910s13,214#124 (1917)#127
1920s16,265#135 (1920)#149
1930s10,582#151 (1930)#176
1940s7,868#204 (1940)#247
1950s6,160#292 (1950)#347
1960s3,355#420 (1960)#549
1970s1,165#755 (1970)#1,140
1980s537#1,510 (1982)#2,115
1990s334#2,701 (1994)#3,523
2000s293#3,808 (2000)#4,721
2010s313#3,588 (2016)#4,649
2020s187#3,459 (2025)#4,526

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Verna in 1910

girls
#130
626 births · 1 in 633 girls

Top girls' names in 1910

  1. #1Mary22,848
  2. #2Helen10,479
  3. #3Margaret8,226
  4. #4Dorothy7,318
  5. #5Ruth7,212
  6. #6Anna6,436
  7. #7Elizabeth5,800
  8. #8Mildred5,692
  9. #9Marie4,790
  10. #10Alice4,671
  11. #130Verna626
More about 1910

girls

396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 633 of them was named Verna, which outranked 95.3% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Verna
  1. #127Lottie634
  2. #128Sara633
  3. #129Nettie627
  4. #130Verna626
  5. #131Kathleen622
  6. #132Maria621
  7. #132Sophie621
Biggest movers since 1909
Risers
  1. ↑ 960Alys#1,957 → #997
  2. ↑ 849Lannie#1,763 → #914
  3. ↑ 766Luz#1,763 → #997
  4. ↑ 762Vivien#1,607 → #845
  5. ↑ 693Buna#1,607 → #914
Fallers
  1. ↓ 864Earl#909 → #1,773
  2. ↓ 864Fleta#909 → #1,773
  3. ↓ 783Elba#990 → #1,773
  4. ↓ 644Odile#990 → #1,634
  5. ↓ 576Claribel#845 → #1,421

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1910 →