Verna

#3,459 for girls in 2025, 44 births · Last seen for boys in 1978 at #5,772
Given to girls 99.2% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1906 · 533 births
Debut · girls
46 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
69,113
since 1880

Verna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Verna has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201932peak #117, 1906girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,45944—
2024#4,89327—
2023#5,12625—
2022#3,89338—
2021#5,23724—
2020#4,54829—
2019#5,04126—
2018#3,91837—
2017#4,06636—
2016#3,58843—
2015#5,28825—
2014#3,92538—
2013#4,42232—
2012#5,25326—
2011#4,80729—
2010#6,18221—
2009#7,67916—
2008#4,08938—
2007#5,23027—
2006#4,68530—
2005#4,70428—
2004#4,38731—
2003#4,10932—
2002#4,49827—
2001#4,02531—
2000#3,80833—
1999#3,71832—
1998#3,11640—
1997#4,66022—
1996#4,73921—
1995#3,78028—
1994#2,70145—
1993#2,82542—
1992#3,58130—
1991#2,88640—
1990#3,22734—
1989#2,61843—
1988#2,59741—
1987#2,53140—
1986#2,42041—
1985#2,28344—
1984#2,14946—
1983#1,60869—
1982#1,51079—
1981#1,52878—
1980#1,90456—
1979#1,64568—
1978#1,51174#5,7725
1977#1,44077—
1976#1,16099—
1975#1,127103—
1974#1,094106—
1973#1,009117—
1972#863149—
1971#796177—
1970#755195#3,8367
1969#682213—
1968#711188#4,1365
1967#572274—
1966#562286—
1965#576274—
1964#522354#3,6016
1963#514359#3,3187
1962#478410#4,0335
1961#454465#3,6526
1960#420532—
1959#420509#3,9885
1958#392546—
1957#369605#3,0248
1956#355606#3,5356
1955#346617#2,55810
1954#358584—
1953#320652#3,7985
1952#316655—
1951#303667#2,49510
1950#292719#3,3296
1949#284736#2,6069
1948#293681#3,6685
1947#276777#3,7335
1946#265742—
1945#253719#2,5748
1944#243734#3,4305
1943#222881#2,7328
1942#222871#3,5605
1941#207862—
1940#204865#2,4789
1939#190927—
1938#197927#2,4799
1937#192934#1,91314
1936#189950#2,6298
1935#181979#2,9517
1934#1771,040#2,39310
1933#1681,078#2,09312
1932#1651,175#1,92215
1931#1541,213#2,00314
1930#1511,359#2,44411
1929#1561,342#2,31712
1928#1521,458#2,27013
1927#1531,535#1,95917
1926#1521,586#1,72020
1925#1531,613#2,08915
1924#1531,661#2,47312
1923#1461,713#2,61411
1922#1461,693#1,69521
1921#1411,813#1,90418
1920#1351,851#2,13115
1919#1311,816#1,75219
1918#1251,873#2,39812
1917#1241,799#3,9815
1916#1251,713#1,84916
1915#1261,570#1,96814
1914#1251,226#2,2719
1913#1261,038#2,0928
1912#126914—
1911#132639#1,3877
1910#130626—
1909#122582#1,2776
1908#123549—
1907#123538—
1906#117533—
1905#129488#1,0916
1904#136429#1,2055
1903#131424—
1902#129436#8628
1901#138361#9436
1900#143412—
1899#143329—
1898#128410—
1897#138350—
1896#143326—
1895#140326—
1894#138310—
1893#142292—
1892#157246—
1891#166203—
1890#145244—
1889#168174—
1888#175165—
1887#176129—
1886#174134—
1885#176108—
1884#19987—
1883#163103#8925
1882#18076—
1881#28630—
1880#22746—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Verna was already there! It came in at #227, and was given to 46 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2009–2010, when fewer than 22 girls a year got the name.

Where Verna is popular in 1932

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedAKMaine: #120 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 535 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedNHWashington: #114 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 517 girlsWAIdaho: #74 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 268 girlsIDMontana: #126 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 486 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #72 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 249 girlsNDMinnesota: #105 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 472 girlsMNIllinois: #125 for girls · 76 births · 1 in 665 girlsILWisconsin: #125 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 742 girlsWIMichigan: #162 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,079 girlsMINew York: #304 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 3,388 girlsNYMassachusetts: #173 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,662 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedRIOregon: #97 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 413 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #74 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 282 girlsSDIowa: #95 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 468 girlsIAIndiana: #181 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,265 girlsINOhio: #163 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 1,115 girlsOHPennsylvania: #128 for girls · 99 births · 1 in 750 girlsPANew Jersey: #217 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,900 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #201 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,180 girlsCAUtah: #96 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 392 girlsUTColorado: #141 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 605 girlsCONebraska: #85 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 377 girlsNEMissouri: #107 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 469 girlsMOKentucky: #162 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 759 girlsKYWest Virginia: #196 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,097 girlsWVVirginia: #183 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,022 girlsVAMaryland: #159 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,013 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedDEArizona: #138 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 470 girlsAZNew Mexico: #125 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 430 girlsNMKansas: #125 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 574 girlsKSArkansas: #139 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 586 girlsARTennessee: #175 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 822 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #195 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,079 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #97 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 414 girlsOKLouisiana: #124 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 466 girlsLAMississippi: #249 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,295 girlsMSAlabama: #230 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,359 girlsALGeorgia: #248 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,618 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Verna, so not publishedHITexas: #153 for girls · 83 births · 1 in 678 girlsTXFlorida: #306 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,044 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#72 · 1 in 249
  2. Idaho#74 · 1 in 268
  3. South Dakota#74 · 1 in 282
  4. Nebraska#85 · 1 in 377
  5. Iowa#95 · 1 in 468

Best ever in a state: #24 in Nevada, 1916.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#72231 in 249
Idaho#74121 in 268
South Dakota#74191 in 282
Nebraska#85271 in 377
Iowa#95381 in 468
Utah#96111 in 392
Oklahoma#97531 in 414
Oregon#97121 in 413
Minnesota#105411 in 472
Missouri#107591 in 469
Washington#114171 in 517
Maine#120121 in 535
Louisiana#124451 in 466
Illinois#125761 in 665
Kansas#125231 in 574
New Mexico#125111 in 430
Wisconsin#125311 in 742
Montana#12671 in 486
Pennsylvania#128991 in 750
Arizona#13881 in 470
Arkansas#139321 in 586
Colorado#141131 in 605
Texas#153831 in 678
Maryland#159121 in 1,013
Kentucky#162361 in 759
Michigan#162341 in 1,079
Ohio#163411 in 1,115
Massachusetts#173181 in 1,662
Tennessee#175331 in 822
Indiana#181181 in 1,265
Virginia#183241 in 1,022
North Carolina#195341 in 1,079
West Virginia#196161 in 1,097
California#201291 in 1,180
New Jersey#217141 in 1,900
Alabama#230221 in 1,359
Georgia#248191 in 1,618
Mississippi#249171 in 1,295
New York#304261 in 3,388
Florida#30661 in 2,044
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Verna
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 1,434 spots since 2024 (#4,893 → #3,459)
  • 1,089 spots since 2020 (#4,548 → #3,459)
  • 1,829 spots since 2015 (#5,288 → #3,459)
  • Biggest jump: 106 spots in 1882 (#286 → #180)
  • Biggest drop: 146 spots in 1973 (#863 → #1,009)
Rise & fade · girls
26 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1906 at #117 (533 births)
  • Births halved by 1968, 62 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 93 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 93 yrs · run 1880–1972
Share of babies · girls
1 in 554
  • Highest: 1 in 554 girls born in 1906 were named Verna (0.18%)
  • Latest: 1 in 36,529 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 23.5% of all girls named Verna (16,265) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,052#163 (1883)#192
1890s3,036#128 (1898)#144
1900s4,752#117 (1906)#129
1910s13,214#124 (1917)#127
1920s16,265#135 (1920)#149
1930s10,582#151 (1930)#176
1940s7,868#204 (1940)#247
1950s6,160#292 (1950)#347
1960s3,355#420 (1960)#549
1970s1,165#755 (1970)#1,140
1980s537#1,510 (1982)#2,115
1990s334#2,701 (1994)#3,523
2000s293#3,808 (2000)#4,721
2010s313#3,588 (2016)#4,649
2020s187#3,459 (2025)#4,526

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Verna in 1932

girls
#165
1,175 births · 1 in 908 girls
boys
#1,922
15 births · 1 in 69,610 boys

Top girls' names in 1932

  1. #1Mary59,883
  2. #2Betty34,420
  3. #3Barbara26,318
  4. #4Dorothy24,974
  5. #5Joan21,044
  6. #6Patricia17,992
  7. #7Margaret16,556
  8. #8Helen16,376
  9. #9Shirley14,476
  10. #10Doris12,910
  11. #165Verna1,175

Top boys' names in 1932

  1. #1Robert59,268
  2. #2James51,930
  3. #3John48,624
  4. #4William42,124
  5. #5Richard31,809
  6. #6Charles31,092
  7. #7Donald29,794
  8. #8George20,439
  9. #9Joseph18,566
  10. #10Thomas16,834
  11. #1,922Verna15
More about 1932

girls

1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 908 of them was named Verna, which outranked 96.8% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Verna
  1. #162Rebecca1,192
  2. #163Jennie1,190
  3. #164Fannie1,177
  4. #165Verna1,175
  5. #166Erma1,167
  6. #167Genevieve1,148
  7. #168Emily1,147
Biggest movers since 1931
Risers
  1. ↑ 963Dian#1,876 → #913
  2. ↑ 519Carleen#1,394 → #875
  3. ↑ 357Jimmy#1,336 → #979
  4. ↑ 347Letty#1,287 → #940
  5. ↑ 340Letitia#1,148 → #808
Fallers
  1. ↓ 350Blossom#970 → #1,320
  2. ↓ 332Luetta#844 → #1,176
  3. ↓ 305Roy#887 → #1,192
  4. ↓ 289Sofia#887 → #1,176
  5. ↓ 282Joretta#463 → #745

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 69,610 of them was named Verna, which outranked 55.1% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Verna
  1. #1,848Umberto16
  2. #1,848Wilferd16
  3. #1,848Yukio16
  4. #1,922Verna15
  5. #1,922Adell15
  6. #1,922Adron15
  7. #1,922Apolonio15
  8. #1,995Adrain14
  9. #1,995Aldon14
  10. #1,995Almond14

Tied with 72 names at #1,922; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1931
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,418Delano#3,095 → #677
  2. ↑ 969Garner#1,643 → #674
  3. ↑ 868Ronny#1,770 → #902
  4. ↑ 713Darryl#1,693 → #980
  5. ↑ 609Marc#1,589 → #980
Fallers
  1. ↓ 467Jones#959 → #1,426
  2. ↓ 455Hamilton#831 → #1,286
  3. ↓ 393Hyman#697 → #1,090
  4. ↓ 373Davey#983 → #1,356
  5. ↓ 341Hayes#983 → #1,324

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1932 →