Via

#6,546 for girls in 2025, 17 births

Peak · girls
2019 · 61 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
350
since 1957

Via over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Via has never cracked the top 2,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202019peak #2,752, 2019girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#6,54617
2024#5,30024
2023#5,75221
2022#4,79328
2021#4,24533
2020#3,84137
2019#2,75261
2018#4,00136
2017#9,34111
2016#8,87512
2015#9,48111
2014#10,9559
2013#14,5826
2012#16,8695
2011—
2010#10,45110
2009#13,7047
2008—
2007—
2006—
2005—
2004—
2003#15,7845
2002—
2001—
2000—
1999—
1998—
1997—
1996—
1995—
1994—
1993—
1992—
1991—
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981#9,1106
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961#5,8516
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957#6,0865
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1957

The first year at least five girls were named Via! It came in at #6,086, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1957–1960, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Via is popular in 2019

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,588 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 26,366 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedHITexas: #2,804 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 26,426 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Via, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. California#2,588 · 1 in 26,366
  2. Texas#2,804 · 1 in 26,426

Best ever in a state: #2,588 in California, 2019.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
California#2,58871 in 26,366
Texas#2,80461 in 26,426
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Via
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 1,246 spots since 2024 (#5,300 → #6,546)
  • 2,705 spots since 2020 (#3,841 → #6,546)
  • 2,935 spots since 2015 (#9,481 → #6,546)
Rise & fade · girls
62 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1957
  • Peaked 2019 at #2,752 (61 births)
  • Births halved by 2022, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 27,514
  • Highest: 1 in 27,514 girls born in 2019 were named Via (0.00%)
  • Latest: 1 in 94,545 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 46.0% of all girls named Via (161) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1950s5#6,086 (1957)#6,086
1960s6#5,851 (1961)#5,851
1970s0——
1980s6#9,110 (1981)#9,110
1990s0——
2000s12#13,704 (2009)#14,744
2010s161#2,752 (2019)#9,701
2020s160#3,841 (2020)#5,080

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Via in 2019

girls
#2,752
61 births · 1 in 27,514 girls

Top girls' names in 2019

  1. #1Olivia18,577
  2. #2Emma17,226
  3. #3Ava14,549
  4. #4Sophia13,821
  5. #5Isabella13,407
  6. #6Charlotte13,239
  7. #7Amelia12,944
  8. #8Mia12,508
  9. #9Harper10,497
  10. #10Evelyn10,443
  11. #2,752Via61
More about 2019

girls

1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 27,514 of them was named Via, which outranked 84.7% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Via
  1. #2,729Sianna62
  2. #2,729Skai62
  3. #2,729Tamar62
  4. #2,752Via61
  5. #2,752Adalind61
  6. #2,752Ainslee61
  7. #2,752Aislyn61
  8. #2,784Arisbeth60
  9. #2,784Azuri60
  10. #2,784Becky60

Tied with 31 names at #2,752; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2018
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,081Amoura#2,059 → #978
  2. ↑ 553Theodora#1,406 → #853
  3. ↑ 456Navy#1,269 → #813
  4. ↑ 415Emani#1,371 → #956
  5. ↑ 403Yaritza#1,216 → #813
Fallers
  1. ↓ 451Emmarie#990 → #1,441
  2. ↓ 368Saniyah#934 → #1,302
  3. ↓ 252Tatiana#692 → #944
  4. ↓ 229Zhavia#879 → #1,108
  5. ↓ 219Jayden#979 → #1,198

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2019 →