Vianney
- #3,296 for girls in 2025, 47 births
- Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
- Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2007 · 142 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,623since 1980
Vianney over time
Rank among girls' names. Vianney has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,296 | 47 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,695 | 41 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,823 | 60 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #3,073 | 53 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,024 | 95 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,659 | 63 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #2,651 | 65 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,869 | 58 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,689 | 64 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,463 | 74 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,194 | 86 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,027 | 97 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,953 | 101 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,719 | 120 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,633 | 132 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,678 | 126 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,593 | 141 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,854 | 115 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,588 | 142 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,702 | 123 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,767 | 111 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,614 | 120 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,019 | 89 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,379 | 67 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,635 | 57 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,334 | 40 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,991 | 44 | — | |
| 1998 | #4,023 | 28 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,897 | 28 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,429 | 33 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,670 | 29 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,790 | 28 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,257 | 24 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,419 | 32 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | — | |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | — | |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | — | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | — | |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Vianney! It came in at #10,392, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1980–1982, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Vianney is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#1,491 · 1 in 10,782
- Texas#1,714 · 1 in 12,349
Best ever in a state: #321 in New Mexico, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #1,491 | 15 | 1 in 10,782 |
| Texas | #1,714 | 13 | 1 in 12,349 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Vianney
- 399 spots since 2024 (#3,695 → #3,296)
- 637 spots since 2020 (#2,659 → #3,296)
- Debuted 1980
- Peaked 2007 at #1,588 (142 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 13,029 girls born in 2009 were named Vianney (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 34,197 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,588 in 2007, was only 1 in 13,540 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 38.3% of all girls named Vianney (1,005) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 60 | #6,277 (1988) | #8,545 |
| 1990s | 276 | #2,991 (1999) | #4,127 |
| 2000s | 1,005 | #1,588 (2007) | #2,049 |
| 2010s | 923 | #1,633 (2011) | #2,188 |
| 2020s | 359 | #2,024 (2021) | #2,928 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Vianney ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: