Victoria
#54 for girls in 2025, 4,027 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #8,312
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 12,148 births
- Debut · girls
- 93 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 62 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 527,915since 1880
Victoria over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #54 | 4,027 | — | |
| 2024 | #48 | 4,281 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #45 | 4,454 | — | |
| 2022 | #43 | 4,782 | — | |
| 2021 | #43 | 4,713 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #34 | 5,303 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #25 | 6,380 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #21 | 7,134 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #19 | 7,314 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | #21 | 7,329 | — | |
| 2015 | #20 | 7,630 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #19 | 8,012 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #25 | 7,215 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #28 | 6,871 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #23 | 6,896 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #32 | 6,236 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #31 | 6,371 | #7,236 | 11 |
| 2008 | #27 | 7,127 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #29 | 7,435 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #27 | 7,653 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #28 | 7,961 | #4,824 | 17 |
| 2004 | #28 | 8,279 | #2,569 | 42 |
| 2003 | #22 | 9,251 | #5,271 | 14 |
| 2002 | #21 | 9,785 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #21 | 10,179 | #6,445 | 10 |
| 2000 | #20 | 10,926 | #4,204 | 18 |
| 1999 | #16 | 11,874 | #4,537 | 15 |
| 1998 | #16 | 12,148 | #4,019 | 17 |
| 1997 | #19 | 11,795 | #3,738 | 18 |
| 1996 | #18 | 11,859 | #3,406 | 20 |
| 1995 | #20 | 12,252 | #2,923 | 24 |
| 1994 | #19 | 12,694 | #3,030 | 23 |
| 1993 | #19 | 12,925 | #2,295 | 33 |
| 1992 | #22 | 11,907 | #2,834 | 24 |
| 1991 | #28 | 10,912 | #2,095 | 35 |
| 1990 | #33 | 9,109 | #2,012 | 37 |
| 1989 | #44 | 7,637 | #1,476 | 56 |
| 1988 | #42 | 7,283 | #2,146 | 29 |
| 1987 | #50 | 6,255 | #2,169 | 27 |
| 1986 | #54 | 5,676 | #1,662 | 38 |
| 1985 | #59 | 5,426 | #1,975 | 29 |
| 1984 | #59 | 5,076 | #2,706 | 17 |
| 1983 | #58 | 5,046 | #1,955 | 27 |
| 1982 | #65 | 4,255 | #2,426 | 20 |
| 1981 | #87 | 3,689 | #2,779 | 16 |
| 1980 | #103 | 2,929 | #3,098 | 14 |
| 1979 | #119 | 2,674 | — | |
| 1978 | #121 | 2,457 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #107 | 2,702 | #3,836 | 9 |
| 1976 | #92 | 3,036 | #3,724 | 9 |
| 1975 | #105 | 2,713 | #2,450 | 17 |
| 1974 | #104 | 2,844 | #3,120 | 11 |
| 1973 | #95 | 3,070 | #2,405 | 16 |
| 1972 | #99 | 3,206 | #2,323 | 16 |
| 1971 | #97 | 3,722 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #85 | 4,460 | #1,889 | 22 |
| 1969 | #83 | 4,390 | #2,308 | 14 |
| 1968 | #82 | 4,286 | #2,109 | 15 |
| 1967 | #93 | 3,664 | #2,242 | 13 |
| 1966 | #103 | 3,362 | #1,757 | 19 |
| 1965 | #108 | 3,480 | #1,987 | 16 |
| 1964 | #129 | 3,157 | #2,546 | 11 |
| 1963 | #130 | 3,246 | #2,115 | 15 |
| 1962 | #121 | 3,705 | #2,504 | 11 |
| 1961 | #114 | 4,149 | #2,706 | 10 |
| 1960 | #114 | 4,294 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #113 | 4,153 | #1,974 | 17 |
| 1958 | #109 | 4,466 | #3,275 | 7 |
| 1957 | #88 | 5,328 | #2,019 | 16 |
| 1956 | #85 | 5,388 | #2,628 | 10 |
| 1955 | #82 | 5,359 | #2,558 | 10 |
| 1954 | #85 | 4,978 | #3,452 | 6 |
| 1953 | #82 | 5,164 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #74 | 5,603 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #81 | 4,907 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #94 | 3,781 | #3,681 | 5 |
| 1949 | #96 | 3,669 | #3,019 | 7 |
| 1948 | #108 | 3,131 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #123 | 2,739 | #3,096 | 7 |
| 1946 | #122 | 2,388 | #2,690 | 8 |
| 1945 | #106 | 2,670 | #2,009 | 12 |
| 1944 | #139 | 1,815 | #3,109 | 6 |
| 1943 | #164 | 1,467 | — | |
| 1942 | #170 | 1,372 | #2,940 | 7 |
| 1941 | #216 | 814 | — | |
| 1940 | #243 | 687 | — | |
| 1939 | #241 | 675 | — | |
| 1938 | #260 | 588 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #252 | 629 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1936 | #269 | 507 | — | |
| 1935 | #256 | 603 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #259 | 585 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | #249 | 600 | #2,542 | 9 |
| 1932 | #258 | 592 | #2,849 | 8 |
| 1931 | #228 | 712 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | #228 | 713 | #3,592 | 6 |
| 1929 | #216 | 825 | #2,317 | 12 |
| 1928 | #217 | 833 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | #205 | 959 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #200 | 963 | — | |
| 1925 | #196 | 1,046 | — | |
| 1924 | #194 | 1,102 | — | |
| 1923 | #190 | 1,150 | #2,950 | 9 |
| 1922 | #186 | 1,145 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #179 | 1,238 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #173 | 1,286 | — | |
| 1919 | #154 | 1,429 | #3,736 | 6 |
| 1918 | #134 | 1,758 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #158 | 1,334 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #150 | 1,340 | #3,177 | 7 |
| 1915 | #151 | 1,266 | — | |
| 1914 | #145 | 1,026 | — | |
| 1913 | #147 | 825 | — | |
| 1912 | #150 | 711 | — | |
| 1911 | #160 | 503 | — | |
| 1910 | #142 | 574 | — | |
| 1909 | #160 | 426 | — | |
| 1908 | #156 | 435 | — | |
| 1907 | #159 | 400 | — | |
| 1906 | #159 | 362 | — | |
| 1905 | #163 | 343 | — | |
| 1904 | #167 | 320 | — | |
| 1903 | #156 | 330 | — | |
| 1902 | #151 | 339 | — | |
| 1901 | #142 | 346 | — | |
| 1900 | #148 | 391 | — | |
| 1899 | #156 | 289 | — | |
| 1898 | #171 | 276 | — | |
| 1897 | #180 | 234 | — | |
| 1896 | #158 | 281 | — | |
| 1895 | #160 | 269 | — | |
| 1894 | #163 | 251 | — | |
| 1893 | #168 | 223 | — | |
| 1892 | #165 | 229 | — | |
| 1891 | #164 | 204 | — | |
| 1890 | #158 | 223 | — | |
| 1889 | #167 | 175 | — | |
| 1888 | #152 | 207 | — | |
| 1887 | #155 | 157 | — | |
| 1886 | #150 | 162 | — | |
| 1885 | #141 | 163 | — | |
| 1884 | #158 | 124 | — | |
| 1883 | #159 | 110 | — | |
| 1882 | #136 | 132 | — | |
| 1881 | #134 | 117 | — | |
| 1880 | #148 | 93 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Victoria was already there! It came in at #148, and was given to 93 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 140 girls a year got the name.
Where Victoria is popular in 1920
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#72 · 1 in 229
- Arizona#78 · 1 in 267
- New Mexico#91 · 1 in 317
- Connecticut#96 · 1 in 418
- New Jersey#96 · 1 in 422
Best ever in a state: #4 in Rhode Island, 1998.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #72 | 13 | 1 in 229 |
| Arizona | #78 | 14 | 1 in 267 |
| New Mexico | #91 | 12 | 1 in 317 |
| Connecticut | #96 | 33 | 1 in 418 |
| New Jersey | #96 | 75 | 1 in 422 |
| Massachusetts | #102 | 75 | 1 in 483 |
| Pennsylvania | #108 | 180 | 1 in 541 |
| New Hampshire | #112 | 8 | 1 in 450 |
| Louisiana | #116 | 51 | 1 in 444 |
| New York | #117 | 186 | 1 in 531 |
| California | #130 | 45 | 1 in 625 |
| Idaho | #131 | 8 | 1 in 544 |
| Wisconsin | #132 | 34 | 1 in 718 |
| Florida | #141 | 18 | 1 in 585 |
| Rhode Island | #142 | 8 | 1 in 701 |
| Michigan | #145 | 47 | 1 in 803 |
| South Carolina | #147 | 36 | 1 in 687 |
| Illinois | #148 | 73 | 1 in 811 |
| Ohio | #168 | 48 | 1 in 1,152 |
| Colorado | #170 | 10 | 1 in 891 |
| North Dakota | #170 | 8 | 1 in 941 |
| Texas | #177 | 76 | 1 in 750 |
| West Virginia | #190 | 16 | 1 in 1,156 |
| Mississippi | #205 | 20 | 1 in 1,070 |
| Maine | #210 | 5 | 1 in 1,352 |
| Washington | #210 | 7 | 1 in 1,500 |
| Kansas | #213 | 12 | 1 in 1,379 |
| Virginia | #219 | 16 | 1 in 1,796 |
| Maryland | #220 | 8 | 1 in 1,864 |
| Minnesota | #224 | 14 | 1 in 1,636 |
| Georgia | #251 | 21 | 1 in 1,780 |
| North Carolina | #252 | 20 | 1 in 1,867 |
| Indiana | #264 | 11 | 1 in 2,407 |
| Nebraska | #264 | 7 | 1 in 1,809 |
| Alabama | #286 | 14 | 1 in 2,196 |
| Missouri | #291 | 13 | 1 in 2,358 |
| Arkansas | #370 | 8 | 1 in 2,598 |
| Kentucky | #378 | 8 | 1 in 3,615 |
| Tennessee | #485 | 5 | 1 in 5,576 |
| Oklahoma | #507 | 5 | 1 in 5,099 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Victoria
- 6 spots since 2024 (#48 → #54)
- 20 spots since 2020 (#34 → #54)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#20 → #54)
- Biggest jump: 46 spots in 1942 (#216 → #170)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 1932 (#228 → #258)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1998 at #16 (12,148 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 22 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 62 yrs · run 1981–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 140 girls born in 1993 were named Victoria (0.71%)
- Latest: 1 in 399 girls born in 2025 (0.25%)
- Its best rank, #16 in 1998, was only 1 in 145 (0.69%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.3% of all girls named Victoria (117,475) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,440 | #134 (1881) | #150 |
| 1890s | 2,479 | #156 (1899) | #164 |
| 1900s | 3,692 | #142 (1901) | #156 |
| 1910s | 10,766 | #134 (1918) | #149 |
| 1920s | 10,547 | #173 (1920) | #196 |
| 1930s | 6,204 | #228 (1930) | #250 |
| 1940s | 20,752 | #96 (1949) | #149 |
| 1950s | 49,127 | #74 (1952) | #89 |
| 1960s | 37,733 | #82 (1968) | #108 |
| 1970s | 30,884 | #85 (1970) | #102 |
| 1980s | 53,272 | #42 (1988) | #62 |
| 1990s | 117,475 | #16 (1998) | #21 |
| 2000s | 84,967 | #20 (2000) | #25 |
| 2010s | 71,017 | #19 (2014) | #23 |
| 2020s | 27,560 | #34 (2020) | #45 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Victoria in 1920
Top girls' names in 1920
More about 1920
girls
1,198,289 girls got a published name in 1920; 1 in 932 of them was named Victoria, which outranked 97.0% of the 5,767 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.