Vincent
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #107 for boys in 2025, 3,267 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1966 · 4,941 births
- Debut · boys
- 41 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 54 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 363,296since 1880
Vincent over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #107 | 3,267 |
| 2024 | #8,946 | 11 | #111 | 3,168 |
| 2023 | — | #120 | 2,996 | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #123 | 2,978 |
| 2021 | — | #117 | 3,199 | |
| 2020 | — | #121 | 3,045 | |
| 2019 | #15,539 | 5 | #115 | 3,346 |
| 2018 | — | #108 | 3,572 | |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | #108 | 3,668 |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | #104 | 3,840 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #109 | 3,727 |
| 2014 | — | #104 | 3,764 | |
| 2013 | — | #101 | 3,859 | |
| 2012 | — | #104 | 3,733 | |
| 2011 | — | #101 | 3,800 | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #109 | 3,530 |
| 2009 | — | #119 | 3,495 | |
| 2008 | — | #119 | 3,583 | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #110 | 3,957 |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | #107 | 4,030 |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #111 | 3,746 |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 | #120 | 3,421 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #117 | 3,417 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #123 | 3,186 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #121 | 3,204 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #120 | 3,235 |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #121 | 3,068 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #121 | 3,097 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #118 | 3,194 |
| 1996 | — | #116 | 3,344 | |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #113 | 3,319 |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #100 | 3,603 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 | #100 | 3,687 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #92 | 4,106 |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | #81 | 4,493 |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | #78 | 4,804 |
| 1989 | #3,893 | 25 | #80 | 4,495 |
| 1988 | #2,803 | 37 | #81 | 4,054 |
| 1987 | #3,524 | 25 | #95 | 3,173 |
| 1986 | #3,890 | 21 | #93 | 3,092 |
| 1985 | #2,939 | 31 | #95 | 3,040 |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | #95 | 2,972 |
| 1983 | #3,687 | 21 | #97 | 2,893 |
| 1982 | #3,647 | 22 | #103 | 2,866 |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 | #107 | 2,773 |
| 1980 | #3,853 | 20 | #111 | 2,696 |
| 1979 | #3,442 | 23 | #109 | 2,519 |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | #105 | 2,505 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #110 | 2,458 |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | #105 | 2,451 |
| 1975 | #3,774 | 17 | #109 | 2,383 |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | #107 | 2,436 |
| 1973 | #3,481 | 18 | #99 | 2,686 |
| 1972 | #2,598 | 27 | #105 | 2,746 |
| 1971 | #2,801 | 25 | #87 | 3,435 |
| 1970 | #2,522 | 29 | #79 | 4,021 |
| 1969 | #2,515 | 27 | #70 | 4,056 |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | #73 | 3,982 |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 | #65 | 4,393 |
| 1966 | #1,700 | 44 | #58 | 4,941 |
| 1965 | #1,950 | 35 | #61 | 5,428 |
| 1964 | #2,752 | 21 | #64 | 5,677 |
| 1963 | #2,252 | 28 | #61 | 6,152 |
| 1962 | #2,312 | 27 | #66 | 6,159 |
| 1961 | #2,839 | 19 | #98 | 4,317 |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 | #98 | 4,373 |
| 1959 | #3,827 | 11 | #102 | 4,212 |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | #98 | 4,271 |
| 1957 | #3,930 | 10 | #97 | 4,083 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | #98 | 3,756 |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #99 | 3,482 |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | #104 | 3,358 |
| 1953 | #3,687 | 10 | #100 | 3,174 |
| 1952 | #3,372 | 11 | #101 | 3,168 |
| 1951 | #3,284 | 11 | #104 | 2,927 |
| 1950 | #3,662 | 9 | #101 | 2,920 |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | #102 | 2,911 |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | #106 | 2,788 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #105 | 2,803 |
| 1946 | #4,417 | 6 | #110 | 2,425 |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 | #110 | 2,116 |
| 1944 | #3,378 | 8 | #113 | 2,029 |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 | #106 | 2,420 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #101 | 2,381 |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #104 | 2,049 |
| 1940 | — | #104 | 1,975 | |
| 1939 | #2,922 | 9 | #110 | 1,810 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | #110 | 1,834 |
| 1937 | #2,448 | 12 | #104 | 1,836 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #109 | 1,737 |
| 1935 | — | #106 | 1,796 | |
| 1934 | #2,567 | 11 | #101 | 1,865 |
| 1933 | #2,404 | 12 | #94 | 1,983 |
| 1932 | #3,047 | 9 | #93 | 2,066 |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | #86 | 2,162 |
| 1930 | #2,202 | 15 | #84 | 2,318 |
| 1929 | #2,098 | 16 | #82 | 2,328 |
| 1928 | #2,023 | 18 | #82 | 2,440 |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 | #77 | 2,647 |
| 1926 | #2,351 | 15 | #77 | 2,543 |
| 1925 | #1,946 | 20 | #71 | 2,772 |
| 1924 | #3,665 | 8 | #78 | 2,638 |
| 1923 | #3,350 | 9 | #72 | 2,719 |
| 1922 | #2,780 | 12 | #71 | 2,710 |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 | #70 | 2,779 |
| 1920 | #2,731 | 12 | #73 | 2,661 |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 | #71 | 2,531 |
| 1918 | #2,376 | 14 | #73 | 2,621 |
| 1917 | #2,428 | 13 | #65 | 2,636 |
| 1916 | #3,258 | 8 | #67 | 2,500 |
| 1915 | #2,255 | 13 | #65 | 2,491 |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | #61 | 1,962 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | #65 | 1,527 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #72 | 1,178 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #80 | 496 |
| 1910 | — | #99 | 343 | |
| 1909 | — | #101 | 264 | |
| 1908 | — | #102 | 250 | |
| 1907 | — | #102 | 239 | |
| 1906 | — | #111 | 193 | |
| 1905 | — | #122 | 176 | |
| 1904 | — | #101 | 206 | |
| 1903 | — | #115 | 170 | |
| 1902 | — | #130 | 148 | |
| 1901 | — | #127 | 131 | |
| 1900 | — | #129 | 177 | |
| 1899 | — | #129 | 125 | |
| 1898 | — | #132 | 140 | |
| 1897 | — | #143 | 112 | |
| 1896 | — | #147 | 112 | |
| 1895 | — | #126 | 134 | |
| 1894 | — | #163 | 94 | |
| 1893 | — | #175 | 82 | |
| 1892 | — | #170 | 93 | |
| 1891 | — | #175 | 74 | |
| 1890 | — | #212 | 61 | |
| 1889 | — | #200 | 65 | |
| 1888 | — | #216 | 67 | |
| 1887 | — | #218 | 52 | |
| 1886 | — | #235 | 50 | |
| 1885 | — | #237 | 48 | |
| 1884 | — | #235 | 51 | |
| 1883 | — | #245 | 43 | |
| 1882 | — | #277 | 38 | |
| 1881 | — | #289 | 30 | |
| 1880 | — | #262 | 41 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Vincent was already there! It came in at #262, and was given to 41 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 44 boys a year got the name.
Where Vincent is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Jersey#70 · 1 in 300
- New York#73 · 1 in 319
- Minnesota#81 · 1 in 301
- Montana#85 · 1 in 264
- Rhode Island#90 · 1 in 300
Best ever in a state: #19 in Rhode Island, 1921.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #70 | 152 | 1 in 300 |
| New York | #73 | 342 | 1 in 319 |
| Minnesota | #81 | 99 | 1 in 301 |
| Montana | #85 | 16 | 1 in 264 |
| Rhode Island | #90 | 15 | 1 in 300 |
| Michigan | #98 | 126 | 1 in 408 |
| New Hampshire | #98 | 15 | 1 in 352 |
| Wisconsin | #98 | 73 | 1 in 402 |
| Delaware | #99 | 12 | 1 in 329 |
| California | #100 | 625 | 1 in 407 |
| Massachusetts | #100 | 74 | 1 in 433 |
| Pennsylvania | #100 | 149 | 1 in 429 |
| Illinois | #106 | 164 | 1 in 456 |
| New Mexico | #106 | 30 | 1 in 372 |
| Maryland | #109 | 63 | 1 in 475 |
| Alaska | #114 | 10 | 1 in 351 |
| Ohio | #114 | 140 | 1 in 460 |
| Florida | #118 | 177 | 1 in 568 |
| Indiana | #122 | 76 | 1 in 504 |
| Arizona | #123 | 93 | 1 in 467 |
| Nevada | #123 | 35 | 1 in 431 |
| South Dakota | #125 | 11 | 1 in 379 |
| Nebraska | #126 | 24 | 1 in 431 |
| Vermont | #126 | 5 | 1 in 388 |
| Iowa | #129 | 36 | 1 in 458 |
| Washington | #135 | 63 | 1 in 591 |
| District of Columbia | #136 | 9 | 1 in 471 |
| Oregon | #136 | 37 | 1 in 544 |
| Connecticut | #137 | 26 | 1 in 621 |
| Kansas | #137 | 33 | 1 in 513 |
| Idaho | #138 | 20 | 1 in 460 |
| Colorado | #144 | 52 | 1 in 571 |
| Maine | #146 | 9 | 1 in 567 |
| Missouri | #149 | 53 | 1 in 651 |
| North Dakota | #150 | 7 | 1 in 499 |
| Texas | #153 | 293 | 1 in 646 |
| West Virginia | #171 | 12 | 1 in 722 |
| Virginia | #173 | 53 | 1 in 811 |
| Louisiana | #177 | 30 | 1 in 838 |
| Utah | #178 | 34 | 1 in 697 |
| Georgia | #185 | 70 | 1 in 874 |
| Oklahoma | #189 | 25 | 1 in 857 |
| Arkansas | #190 | 19 | 1 in 801 |
| Hawaii | #191 | 7 | 1 in 715 |
| Kentucky | #206 | 23 | 1 in 1,027 |
| Alabama | #209 | 23 | 1 in 1,092 |
| Mississippi | #210 | 16 | 1 in 983 |
| North Carolina | #214 | 51 | 1 in 1,092 |
| Tennessee | #229 | 33 | 1 in 1,143 |
| South Carolina | #233 | 20 | 1 in 1,150 |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Vincent
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 4 spots since 2024 (#111 → #107)
- 14 spots since 2020 (#121 → #107)
- 2 spots since 2015 (#109 → #107)
- Biggest jump: 37 spots in 1891 (#212 → #175)
- Biggest drop: 27 spots in 1881 (#262 → #289)
Rise & fade · boys
86 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1966 at #58 (4,941 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 54 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 54 yrs · run 1910–1933
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 330
- Highest: 1 in 330 boys born in 1963 were named Vincent (0.30%)
- Latest: 1 in 523 boys born in 2025 (0.19%)
- Its best rank, #58 in 1966, was only 1 in 361 (0.28%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1960s
- 13.6% of all boys named Vincent (49,478) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 485 | #200 (1889) | #241 |
| 1890s | 1,027 | #126 (1895) | #157 |
| 1900s | 1,954 | #101 (1909) | #114 |
| 1910s | 18,285 | #61 (1914) | #72 |
| 1920s | 26,237 | #70 (1921) | #75 |
| 1930s | 19,407 | #84 (1930) | #100 |
| 1940s | 23,897 | #101 (1942) | #106 |
| 1950s | 35,351 | #97 (1957) | #100 |
| 1960s | 49,478 | #58 (1966) | #71 |
| 1970s | 27,640 | #79 (1970) | #102 |
| 1980s | 32,054 | #80 (1989) | #96 |
| 1990s | 36,715 | #78 (1990) | #104 |
| 2000s | 35,274 | #107 (2006) | #117 |
| 2010s | 36,839 | #101 (2013) | #106 |
| 2020s | 18,653 | #107 (2025) | #117 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Vincent in 2008
boys
#119
3,583 births · 1 in 569 boys
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 569 of them was named Vincent, which outranked 99.2% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Vincent
Biggest movers since 2007
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.