Viola

#1,013 for girls in 2025, 247 births · Last seen for boys in 1948 at #3,316
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1908 · 1,964 births
Debut · girls
229 births
In top 100 · girls
47 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
132,993
since 1880

Viola over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201966peak #42, 1908girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,013247—
2024#1,184202—
2023#1,066233—
2022#1,030249—
2021#1,162210—
2020#1,118216—
2019#1,075234—
2018#1,141214—
2017#1,160212—
2016#1,137223—
2015#1,266192—
2014#1,248194—
2013#1,292181—
2012#1,379169—
2011#1,598135—
2010#1,762117—
2009#1,838116—
2008#2,09297—
2007#2,015101—
2006#2,00399—
2005#2,73161—
2004#2,96553—
2003#2,63860—
2002#2,64258—
2001#3,14244—
2000#3,07045—
1999#2,67552—
1998#2,97343—
1997#2,77644—
1996#2,63047—
1995#2,88041—
1994#2,75244—
1993#2,48950—
1992#2,54849—
1991#2,18960—
1990#2,20158—
1989#1,99863—
1988#1,76971—
1987#1,69971—
1986#1,89059—
1985#1,76064—
1984#1,38884—
1983#1,51275—
1982#1,39987—
1981#1,44584—
1980#1,238106—
1979#1,42086—
1978#1,69062—
1977#1,34584—
1976#1,16099—
1975#1,26988—
1974#1,023117—
1973#1,033113—
1972#949128—
1971#976130—
1970#880151—
1969#892139—
1968#783163—
1967#678204—
1966#680205—
1965#616250—
1964#575294—
1963#554308—
1962#548320—
1961#475421—
1960#472428—
1959#481407—
1958#448452—
1957#444448—
1956#389528—
1955#387512—
1954#361574—
1953#356571—
1952#322634—
1951#313636—
1950#311624—
1949#296685—
1948#284724#3,3166
1947#269813—
1946#255781#3,5255
1945#242765#2,9966
1944#234800#3,4305
1943#220893—
1942#213941—
1941#202901#3,1336
1940#190966#2,32210
1939#187980#2,15911
1938#1871,040#2,6468
1937#1751,158#2,9057
1936#1651,188#2,4529
1935#1521,325—
1934#1411,435#3,2776
1933#1381,478#2,09312
1932#1361,668#2,46510
1931#1271,823#1,58920
1930#1162,161#3,5926
1929#1092,291#1,93316
1928#1032,623#2,04815
1927#1012,769#2,70310
1926#972,876#1,84618
1925#843,336#2,08915
1924#823,577#2,64111
1923#793,534#2,44612
1922#723,793#2,04016
1921#664,160#2,26514
1920#594,292#1,88518
1919#584,129#2,15214
1918#594,331#2,54311
1917#594,040#2,18813
1916#593,948#2,7309
1915#593,855#2,31011
1914#573,203—
1913#522,847#1,80310
1912#522,550—
1911#472,083#1,7405
1910#482,090#1,1938
1909#461,926#95110
1908#421,964#9469
1907#471,805—
1906#471,675#1,1116
1905#441,697#1,0916
1904#461,545#1,0646
1903#441,495#1,0096
1902#481,447#68711
1901#471,331#1,0585
1900#491,674#1,3105
1899#501,156#8577
1898#531,272—
1897#581,017—
1896#611,047—
1895#631,010—
1894#65906—
1893#66839—
1892#66833—
1891#73609#9635
1890#68697—
1889#76536#9745
1888#74596—
1887#80420—
1886#77440—
1885#88345—
1884#82362—
1883#83331—
1882#83310—
1881#92237—
1880#94229—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Viola was already there! It came in at #94, and was given to 229 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1990–2005, when fewer than 62 girls a year got the name.

Where Viola is popular in 1966

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedMNIllinois: #811 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 10,998 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedMINew York: #1,389 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 29,166 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedIAIndiana: #622 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,411 girlsINOhio: #584 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 7,744 girlsOHPennsylvania: #888 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 17,906 girlsPANew Jersey: #502 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,160 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #727 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 8,092 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedWVVirginia: #378 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,116 girlsVAMaryland: #346 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,734 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #233 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 966 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #639 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,938 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #445 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,539 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #669 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,408 girlsLAMississippi: #376 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,438 girlsMSAlabama: #412 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,068 girlsALGeorgia: #506 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,835 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedHITexas: #481 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 3,534 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Viola, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#233 · 1 in 966
  2. Maryland#346 · 1 in 2,734
  3. Mississippi#376 · 1 in 2,438
  4. Virginia#378 · 1 in 3,116
  5. Alabama#412 · 1 in 3,068

Best ever in a state: #10 in South Dakota, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#23391 in 966
Maryland#346101 in 2,734
Mississippi#37681 in 2,438
Virginia#378111 in 3,116
Alabama#41291 in 3,068
South Carolina#44561 in 3,539
Texas#481261 in 3,534
New Jersey#502101 in 5,160
Georgia#50681 in 4,835
Ohio#584111 in 7,744
Indiana#62251 in 8,411
North Carolina#63951 in 7,938
Louisiana#66951 in 6,408
California#727191 in 8,092
Illinois#81181 in 10,998
Pennsylvania#88851 in 17,906
New York#1,38951 in 29,166
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Viola
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 171 spots since 2024 (#1,184 → #1,013)
  • 105 spots since 2020 (#1,118 → #1,013)
  • 253 spots since 2015 (#1,266 → #1,013)
  • Biggest jump: 27 spots in 1972 (#976 → #949)
  • Biggest drop: 109 spots in 1969 (#783 → #892)
Rise & fade · girls
28 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1908 at #42 (1,964 births)
  • Births halved by 1939, 31 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 47 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 47 yrs · run 1880–1926
  • Top 1,000: 93 yrs · run 1880–1972
Share of babies · girls
1 in 170
  • Highest: 1 in 170 girls born in 1908 were named Viola (0.59%)
  • Latest: 1 in 6,507 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 25.0% of all girls named Viola (33,251) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s3,806#74 (1888)#83
1890s9,386#50 (1899)#62
1900s16,559#42 (1908)#46
1910s33,076#47 (1911)#55
1920s33,251#59 (1920)#85
1930s14,256#116 (1930)#152
1940s8,269#190 (1940)#241
1950s5,386#311 (1950)#381
1960s2,732#472 (1960)#627
1970s1,058#880 (1970)#1,175
1980s764#1,238 (1980)#1,610
1990s488#2,189 (1991)#2,611
2000s734#1,838 (2009)#2,514
2010s1,871#1,075 (2019)#1,306
2020s1,357#1,013 (2025)#1,096

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Viola in 1966

girls
#680
205 births · 1 in 8,255 girls

Top girls' names in 1966

  1. #1Lisa56,918
  2. #2Kimberly32,232
  3. #3Mary28,890
  4. #4Michelle27,159
  5. #5Karen25,450
  6. #6Susan23,776
  7. #7Patricia20,112
  8. #8Tammy18,621
  9. #9Angela18,532
  10. #10Jennifer18,215
  11. #680Viola205
More about 1966

girls

1,692,177 girls got a published name in 1966; 1 in 8,255 of them was named Viola, which outranked 91.1% of the 7,624 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Viola
  1. #675Myrna207
  2. #675Rosanne207
  3. #679Tresa206
  4. #680Viola205
  5. #680Carlene205
  6. #680Maribel205
  7. #683Cindi204
  8. #683Tana204
  9. #685Agnes203

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1965
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,121Tabatha#6,539 → #418
  2. ↑ 1,469Tabitha#1,993 → #524
  3. ↑ 1,325Joell#2,247 → #922
  4. ↑ 1,047Tatia#1,715 → #668
  5. ↑ 969Nichole#1,829 → #860
Fallers
  1. ↓ 398Barb#815 → #1,213
  2. ↓ 310Jewell#952 → #1,262
  3. ↓ 288Roxie#944 → #1,232
  4. ↓ 284Aretha#818 → #1,102
  5. ↓ 280Kecia#392 → #672

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1966 →