Violet
#13 for girls in 2025, 7,546 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #12,349
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 7,546 births
- Debut · girls
- 42 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 40 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 185,561since 1880
Violet over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13 | 7,546 | — | |
| 2024 | #15 | 6,986 | #12,349 | 5 |
| 2023 | #16 | 6,370 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #20 | 6,477 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #36 | 5,524 | — | |
| 2020 | #37 | 5,128 | — | |
| 2019 | #36 | 5,418 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #43 | 4,834 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #47 | 4,741 | — | |
| 2016 | #47 | 4,882 | — | |
| 2015 | #50 | 4,822 | — | |
| 2014 | #67 | 4,193 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #69 | 3,935 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #89 | 3,283 | — | |
| 2011 | #101 | 2,902 | — | |
| 2010 | #122 | 2,571 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #140 | 2,262 | — | |
| 2008 | #182 | 1,830 | — | |
| 2007 | #228 | 1,538 | — | |
| 2006 | #260 | 1,268 | — | |
| 2005 | #369 | 846 | — | |
| 2004 | #583 | 482 | — | |
| 2003 | #584 | 469 | — | |
| 2002 | #610 | 419 | — | |
| 2001 | #660 | 381 | — | |
| 2000 | #734 | 316 | — | |
| 1999 | #847 | 255 | — | |
| 1998 | #899 | 234 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,040 | 183 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,124 | 161 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,096 | 162 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,129 | 159 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,222 | 142 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,216 | 143 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,263 | 133 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,279 | 127 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,213 | 133 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,147 | 133 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,070 | 143 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,142 | 125 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,046 | 142 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,028 | 138 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,005 | 141 | — | |
| 1982 | #985 | 150 | — | |
| 1981 | #991 | 147 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,023 | 141 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,125 | 119 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,126 | 115 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,042 | 127 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,078 | 113 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,048 | 113 | — | |
| 1974 | #938 | 132 | — | |
| 1973 | #929 | 132 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,056 | 109 | — | |
| 1971 | #911 | 143 | — | |
| 1970 | #920 | 140 | — | |
| 1969 | #897 | 138 | — | |
| 1968 | #861 | 141 | — | |
| 1967 | #809 | 152 | — | |
| 1966 | #670 | 210 | — | |
| 1965 | #675 | 212 | — | |
| 1964 | #672 | 230 | — | |
| 1963 | #646 | 244 | — | |
| 1962 | #575 | 292 | — | |
| 1961 | #558 | 317 | — | |
| 1960 | #541 | 320 | — | |
| 1959 | #535 | 328 | — | |
| 1958 | #486 | 384 | — | |
| 1957 | #485 | 387 | — | |
| 1956 | #487 | 367 | — | |
| 1955 | #444 | 408 | — | |
| 1954 | #408 | 450 | — | |
| 1953 | #420 | 422 | — | |
| 1952 | #405 | 427 | — | |
| 1951 | #381 | 461 | — | |
| 1950 | #343 | 519 | — | |
| 1949 | #359 | 483 | — | |
| 1948 | #339 | 529 | — | |
| 1947 | #310 | 626 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #294 | 614 | — | |
| 1945 | #286 | 588 | — | |
| 1944 | #275 | 636 | — | |
| 1943 | #260 | 711 | — | |
| 1942 | #239 | 803 | #3,212 | 6 |
| 1941 | #223 | 780 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #217 | 783 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #196 | 911 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #194 | 959 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #177 | 1,139 | — | |
| 1936 | #169 | 1,153 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #159 | 1,274 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #148 | 1,370 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | #136 | 1,517 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #132 | 1,692 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #132 | 1,750 | #2,471 | 10 |
| 1930 | #120 | 2,098 | #2,609 | 10 |
| 1929 | #111 | 2,214 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #112 | 2,322 | #1,960 | 16 |
| 1927 | #103 | 2,694 | #2,703 | 10 |
| 1926 | #94 | 2,903 | #2,186 | 14 |
| 1925 | #92 | 3,032 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #88 | 3,224 | #3,505 | 7 |
| 1923 | #86 | 3,276 | #3,175 | 8 |
| 1922 | #86 | 3,194 | #3,252 | 8 |
| 1921 | #81 | 3,469 | #2,632 | 11 |
| 1920 | #77 | 3,694 | #2,336 | 13 |
| 1919 | #74 | 3,597 | #2,665 | 10 |
| 1918 | #83 | 3,294 | #3,096 | 8 |
| 1917 | #84 | 3,026 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #83 | 2,921 | #3,516 | 6 |
| 1915 | #82 | 2,752 | #2,829 | 8 |
| 1914 | #82 | 2,061 | — | |
| 1913 | #82 | 1,751 | — | |
| 1912 | #83 | 1,535 | #2,269 | 6 |
| 1911 | #83 | 1,183 | — | |
| 1910 | #89 | 1,037 | — | |
| 1909 | #88 | 945 | — | |
| 1908 | #81 | 1,017 | — | |
| 1907 | #81 | 956 | — | |
| 1906 | #86 | 830 | — | |
| 1905 | #82 | 831 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | #87 | 755 | — | |
| 1903 | #93 | 636 | — | |
| 1902 | #94 | 649 | — | |
| 1901 | #91 | 611 | — | |
| 1900 | #108 | 614 | — | |
| 1899 | #111 | 435 | — | |
| 1898 | #127 | 411 | — | |
| 1897 | #119 | 411 | — | |
| 1896 | #135 | 354 | — | |
| 1895 | #142 | 316 | — | |
| 1894 | #154 | 286 | — | |
| 1893 | #157 | 254 | — | |
| 1892 | #163 | 238 | — | |
| 1891 | #176 | 188 | — | |
| 1890 | #176 | 183 | — | |
| 1889 | #183 | 155 | — | |
| 1888 | #185 | 145 | — | |
| 1887 | #208 | 97 | — | |
| 1886 | #195 | 103 | — | |
| 1885 | #196 | 92 | — | |
| 1884 | #210 | 81 | — | |
| 1883 | #201 | 74 | — | |
| 1882 | #249 | 48 | — | |
| 1881 | #244 | 42 | — | |
| 1880 | #238 | 42 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Violet was already there! It came in at #238, and was given to 42 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 49 girls a year got the name.
Where Violet is popular in 1910
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Hawaii#5 · 1 in 23
- Minnesota#33 · 1 in 119
- Idaho#37 · 1 in 108
- Utah#41 · 1 in 117
- West Virginia#41 · 1 in 163
Best ever in a state: #3 in Minnesota, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #5 | 16 | 1 in 23 |
| Minnesota | #33 | 49 | 1 in 119 |
| Idaho | #37 | 7 | 1 in 108 |
| Utah | #41 | 9 | 1 in 117 |
| West Virginia | #41 | 35 | 1 in 163 |
| South Dakota | #42 | 14 | 1 in 126 |
| Oregon | #43 | 12 | 1 in 114 |
| California | #44 | 36 | 1 in 165 |
| Illinois | #44 | 101 | 1 in 182 |
| Michigan | #45 | 53 | 1 in 164 |
| Nebraska | #46 | 24 | 1 in 146 |
| Indiana | #51 | 37 | 1 in 200 |
| North Dakota | #57 | 13 | 1 in 165 |
| Kansas | #62 | 22 | 1 in 217 |
| Pennsylvania | #62 | 112 | 1 in 282 |
| Ohio | #63 | 53 | 1 in 282 |
| Missouri | #65 | 46 | 1 in 238 |
| Wisconsin | #66 | 26 | 1 in 262 |
| Washington | #68 | 12 | 1 in 226 |
| Maine | #69 | 8 | 1 in 224 |
| Iowa | #70 | 23 | 1 in 249 |
| Colorado | #75 | 10 | 1 in 247 |
| New Jersey | #77 | 26 | 1 in 333 |
| Oklahoma | #95 | 23 | 1 in 316 |
| Florida | #98 | 12 | 1 in 336 |
| Arkansas | #99 | 23 | 1 in 328 |
| Connecticut | #102 | 7 | 1 in 453 |
| Virginia | #116 | 23 | 1 in 469 |
| Maryland | #122 | 8 | 1 in 596 |
| New York | #123 | 52 | 1 in 624 |
| Massachusetts | #129 | 15 | 1 in 702 |
| Kentucky | #137 | 18 | 1 in 591 |
| North Carolina | #150 | 17 | 1 in 742 |
| Tennessee | #157 | 16 | 1 in 655 |
| South Carolina | #162 | 11 | 1 in 851 |
| Texas | #189 | 24 | 1 in 805 |
| Louisiana | #209 | 9 | 1 in 1,079 |
| Alabama | #229 | 9 | 1 in 1,456 |
| Georgia | #247 | 9 | 1 in 1,733 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Violet
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 2 spots since 2024 (#15 → #13)
- 24 spots since 2020 (#37 → #13)
- 37 spots since 2015 (#50 → #13)
- Biggest jump: 214 spots in 2005 (#583 → #369)
- Biggest drop: 145 spots in 1972 (#911 → #1,056)
Rise & fade · girls
145 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2025 at #13 (7,546 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 40 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 40 yrs · run 1901–1926
- Top 1,000: 124 yrs · run 1880–1971
Share of babies · girls
1 in 213
- Highest: 1 in 213 girls born in 2025 were named Violet (0.47%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 22.4% of all girls named Violet (41,581) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #74 (1919) → #1,279 (1990) → #13 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 879 | #183 (1889) | #211 |
| 1890s | 3,076 | #111 (1899) | #146 |
| 1900s | 7,844 | #81 (1908) | #89 |
| 1910s | 23,157 | #74 (1919) | #83 |
| 1920s | 30,022 | #77 (1920) | #93 |
| 1930s | 13,863 | #120 (1930) | #156 |
| 1940s | 6,553 | #217 (1940) | #280 |
| 1950s | 4,153 | #343 (1950) | #439 |
| 1960s | 2,256 | #541 (1960) | #690 |
| 1970s | 1,243 | #911 (1971) | #1,017 |
| 1980s | 1,393 | #985 (1982) | #1,065 |
| 1990s | 1,699 | #847 (1999) | #1,112 |
| 2000s | 9,811 | #140 (2009) | #435 |
| 2010s | 41,581 | #36 (2019) | #67 |
| 2020s | 38,031 | #13 (2025) | #23 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Violet in 1910
girls
#89
1,037 births · 1 in 382 girls
Top girls' names in 1910
More about 1910
girls
396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 382 of them was named Violet, which outranked 96.8% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Violet
Biggest movers since 1909
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.