Wallace
#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births · #960 for boys in 2025, 241 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1923 · 2,803 births
- Debut · boys
- 91 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 8 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 83,263since 1880
Wallace over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #960 | 241 |
| 2024 | — | #983 | 229 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #1,016 | 216 |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | #967 | 234 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #892 | 258 |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | #916 | 244 |
| 2019 | #8,597 | 12 | #890 | 245 |
| 2018 | — | #876 | 249 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,023 | 197 | |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 | #1,018 | 198 |
| 2015 | — | #1,198 | 154 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,285 | 138 | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #1,238 | 143 |
| 2012 | — | #1,535 | 104 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,719 | 86 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,898 | 75 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,925 | 74 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,655 | 93 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,760 | 84 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,543 | 96 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,402 | 106 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,582 | 83 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,702 | 72 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,483 | 85 | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #1,345 | 96 |
| 2000 | — | #1,290 | 100 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,421 | 82 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,177 | 105 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,242 | 93 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,177 | 98 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,159 | 98 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,200 | 92 | |
| 1993 | — | #983 | 121 | |
| 1992 | — | #896 | 139 | |
| 1991 | — | #893 | 139 | |
| 1990 | — | #893 | 132 | |
| 1989 | — | #782 | 161 | |
| 1988 | — | #809 | 137 | |
| 1987 | — | #760 | 145 | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #733 | 152 |
| 1985 | — | #651 | 181 | |
| 1984 | — | #606 | 197 | |
| 1983 | — | #582 | 210 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #605 | 200 |
| 1981 | — | #571 | 223 | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #551 | 240 |
| 1979 | — | #575 | 219 | |
| 1978 | — | #574 | 213 | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #536 | 241 |
| 1976 | — | #497 | 257 | |
| 1975 | — | #471 | 294 | |
| 1974 | — | #487 | 269 | |
| 1973 | — | #464 | 284 | |
| 1972 | — | #439 | 326 | |
| 1971 | — | #430 | 356 | |
| 1970 | — | #405 | 401 | |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #387 | 411 |
| 1968 | — | #360 | 465 | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | #340 | 487 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #330 | 520 |
| 1965 | — | #326 | 539 | |
| 1964 | #6,009 | 6 | #308 | 628 |
| 1963 | — | #301 | 658 | |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #283 | 737 |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #289 | 720 |
| 1960 | — | #283 | 783 | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #270 | 852 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #270 | 810 |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #256 | 863 |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #240 | 935 |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | #231 | 953 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #222 | 973 |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 | #212 | 1,018 |
| 1952 | — | #209 | 978 | |
| 1951 | — | #204 | 1,002 | |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | #197 | 1,062 |
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 | #193 | 1,076 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #186 | 1,075 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #179 | 1,190 |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 | #169 | 1,209 |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | #167 | 1,008 |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 | #162 | 1,131 |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #156 | 1,254 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #157 | 1,232 |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #155 | 1,117 |
| 1940 | — | #146 | 1,172 | |
| 1939 | #2,206 | 14 | #151 | 1,070 |
| 1938 | #2,940 | 9 | #139 | 1,176 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | #133 | 1,190 |
| 1936 | #2,857 | 9 | #130 | 1,247 |
| 1935 | #3,742 | 6 | #133 | 1,200 |
| 1934 | #3,449 | 7 | #129 | 1,306 |
| 1933 | #2,540 | 11 | #120 | 1,366 |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 | #117 | 1,525 |
| 1931 | #2,972 | 9 | #114 | 1,543 |
| 1930 | #2,690 | 11 | #111 | 1,618 |
| 1929 | #3,394 | 8 | #106 | 1,706 |
| 1928 | #2,623 | 12 | #104 | 1,845 |
| 1927 | #2,169 | 17 | #96 | 2,009 |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 | #95 | 2,012 |
| 1925 | #2,617 | 13 | #92 | 2,076 |
| 1924 | #2,137 | 18 | #87 | 2,283 |
| 1923 | #2,732 | 12 | #69 | 2,803 |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 | #87 | 2,210 |
| 1921 | #2,378 | 15 | #88 | 2,095 |
| 1920 | #2,172 | 17 | #93 | 1,877 |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 | #107 | 1,481 |
| 1918 | #1,963 | 19 | #124 | 1,334 |
| 1917 | #2,428 | 13 | #123 | 1,215 |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | #124 | 1,126 |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 | #126 | 1,079 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #127 | 810 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | #126 | 621 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #128 | 507 |
| 1911 | — | #132 | 257 | |
| 1910 | — | #131 | 251 | |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 | #142 | 185 |
| 1908 | — | #134 | 190 | |
| 1907 | — | #128 | 185 | |
| 1906 | — | #129 | 162 | |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | #137 | 162 |
| 1904 | — | #130 | 163 | |
| 1903 | — | #124 | 157 | |
| 1902 | — | #123 | 157 | |
| 1901 | — | #126 | 132 | |
| 1900 | — | #137 | 161 | |
| 1899 | — | #131 | 121 | |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | #133 | 138 |
| 1897 | — | #126 | 131 | |
| 1896 | — | #130 | 130 | |
| 1895 | — | #136 | 119 | |
| 1894 | — | #155 | 99 | |
| 1893 | — | #131 | 114 | |
| 1892 | — | #135 | 119 | |
| 1891 | — | #146 | 90 | |
| 1890 | — | #114 | 138 | |
| 1889 | — | #122 | 115 | |
| 1888 | — | #138 | 111 | |
| 1887 | — | #144 | 88 | |
| 1886 | — | #133 | 104 | |
| 1885 | — | #129 | 107 | |
| 1884 | — | #137 | 102 | |
| 1883 | — | #123 | 100 | |
| 1882 | — | #137 | 103 | |
| 1881 | — | #140 | 88 | |
| 1880 | — | #150 | 91 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Wallace was already there! It came in at #150, and was given to 91 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1994–2012, when fewer than 110 boys a year got the name.
Where Wallace is popular in 1910
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Washington#40 · 1 in 122
- Maine#46 · 1 in 135
- Louisiana#72 · 1 in 323
- Iowa#75 · 1 in 311
- Tennessee#78 · 1 in 369
Best ever in a state: #15 in Nevada, 1918.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | #40 | 10 | 1 in 122 |
| Maine | #46 | 5 | 1 in 135 |
| Louisiana | #72 | 15 | 1 in 323 |
| Iowa | #75 | 7 | 1 in 311 |
| Tennessee | #78 | 13 | 1 in 369 |
| Indiana | #84 | 8 | 1 in 346 |
| Wisconsin | #86 | 8 | 1 in 300 |
| Kentucky | #91 | 10 | 1 in 457 |
| Virginia | #91 | 11 | 1 in 462 |
| South Carolina | #93 | 11 | 1 in 511 |
| Minnesota | #94 | 6 | 1 in 391 |
| Massachusetts | #96 | 7 | 1 in 676 |
| Kansas | #97 | 5 | 1 in 438 |
| Pennsylvania | #116 | 16 | 1 in 850 |
| Michigan | #117 | 6 | 1 in 566 |
| Georgia | #122 | 13 | 1 in 692 |
| New York | #142 | 13 | 1 in 1,209 |
| Alabama | #146 | 8 | 1 in 824 |
| Arkansas | #150 | 5 | 1 in 700 |
| Missouri | #161 | 5 | 1 in 996 |
| Mississippi | #183 | 6 | 1 in 1,073 |
| Texas | #187 | 10 | 1 in 907 |
| Illinois | #190 | 5 | 1 in 1,652 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Wallace
- 23 spots since 2024 (#983 → #960)
- 44 spots since 2020 (#916 → #960)
- 238 spots since 2015 (#1,198 → #960)
- Biggest jump: 147 spots in 2018 (#1,023 → #876)
- Biggest drop: 217 spots in 1994 (#983 → #1,200)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1923 at #69 (2,803 births)
- Births halved by 1933, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 8 yrs · run 1920–1927
- Top 1,000: 121 yrs · run 1880–1993
- Highest: 1 in 391 boys born in 1923 were named Wallace (0.26%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,087 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 25.1% of all boys named Wallace (20,916) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,009 | #122 (1889) | #135 |
| 1890s | 1,199 | #114 (1890) | #134 |
| 1900s | 1,654 | #123 (1902) | #131 |
| 1910s | 8,681 | #107 (1919) | #125 |
| 1920s | 20,916 | #69 (1923) | #92 |
| 1930s | 13,241 | #111 (1930) | #128 |
| 1940s | 11,464 | #146 (1940) | #167 |
| 1950s | 9,446 | #197 (1950) | #231 |
| 1960s | 5,948 | #283 (1960) | #321 |
| 1970s | 2,860 | #405 (1970) | #488 |
| 1980s | 1,846 | #551 (1980) | #665 |
| 1990s | 1,099 | #893 (1991) | #1,104 |
| 2000s | 889 | #1,290 (2000) | #1,569 |
| 2010s | 1,589 | #876 (2018) | #1,268 |
| 2020s | 1,422 | #892 (2021) | #956 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Wallace in 1910
Top boys' names in 1910
More about 1910
boys
194,208 boys got a published name in 1910; 1 in 774 of them was named Wallace, which outranked 92.9% of the 1,839 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).