Warner

#11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births · #1,362 for boys in 2025, 137 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1899 · 25 births
Debut · boys
10 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
8,554
since 1880

Warner over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Warner has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201933peak #362, 1899boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#11,9327#1,362137
2024#12,1617#1,494120
2023#15,1945#1,420128
2022—#1,433127
2021—#1,334139
2020—#1,489114
2019#13,7996#1,614102
2018—#1,335135
2017#15,9025#1,488113
2016—#1,81183
2015#16,4195#1,87078
2014—#2,01770
2013—#2,25057
2012#16,8695#1,92374
2011—#2,54748
2010—#2,06965
2009—#2,23159
2008—#2,54249
2007—#3,09037
2006—#2,78441
2005—#2,84637
2004—#2,78837
2003—#2,39244
2002—#2,81733
2001—#2,56237
2000—#2,99329
1999—#3,18225
1998—#3,70819
1997—#3,87717
1996—#2,91125
1995—#3,69317
1994—#3,03023
1993—#2,39931
1992—#2,67026
1991—#3,22419
1990—#2,48827
1989—#2,46926
1988—#2,09030
1987—#2,72519
1986—#2,22625
1985—#2,42721
1984—#2,29222
1983—#1,82230
1982—#2,05926
1981—#1,72633
1980—#1,72633
1979—#2,10424
1978—#1,79429
1977—#2,06323
1976—#1,99924
1975—#1,53034
1974—#1,88624
1973—#1,58630
1972—#1,44135
1971—#1,33040
1970—#1,29741
1969—#1,25240
1968—#1,45529
1967—#1,04349
1966—#1,05948
1965—#1,10645
1964—#1,08249
1963—#89170
1962—#84181
1961—#96763
1960—#94065
1959—#99360
1958—#90270
1957—#1,05052
1956#4,8377#91067
1955#5,8285#92165
1954—#98557
1953—#86868
1952—#79179
1951—#96353
1950—#94853
1949—#82468
1948—#76678
1947—#76481
1946—#77773
1945#4,5565#70475
1944—#69581
1943—#68188
1942—#71381
1941—#64888
1940#4,3495#568109
1939—#529118
1938—#501135
1937#3,8006#458147
1936#4,1815#485136
1935—#445165
1934—#446160
1933—#491130
1932—#521124
1931—#60296
1930—#584105
1929#4,0536#536118
1928—#65991
1927—#66292
1926—#619103
1925—#66393
1924—#568125
1923—#580117
1922—#581122
1921—#474167
1920—#483158
1919—#580107
1918—#585108
1917—#62091
1916—#542111
1915—#62186
1914—#58573
1913—#55261
1912—#55652
1911—#70720
1910—#67719
1909—#57421
1908—#58519
1907—#45726
1906—#56817
1905—#57417
1904—#45222
1903—#40124
1902—#74410
1901—#55913
1900—#53420
1899—#36225
1898—#43521
1897—#51515
1896—#38825
1895—#57913
1894—#50216
1893—#47915
1892—#38424
1891—#45615
1890—#37622
1889—#36923
1888—#38723
1887—#51612
1886—#41718
1885—#43917
1884—#37522
1883—#41218
1882—#46915
1881—#56310
1880—#60010
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Warner was already there! It came in at #600, and was given to 10 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 16 boys a year got the name.

Where Warner is popular in 1933

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedMNIllinois: #372 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 7,060 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: #226 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,966 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedINOhio: #397 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 8,618 boysOHPennsylvania: #472 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 13,820 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #459 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 6,799 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNEMissouri: #337 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,454 boysMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedWVVirginia: #262 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,369 boysVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedARTennessee: #287 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,027 boysTNNorth Carolina: #421 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 5,483 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedLAMississippi: #346 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,122 boysMSAlabama: #338 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,200 boysALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedHITexas: #806 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 10,710 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Warner, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Massachusetts#226 · 1 in 3,966
  2. Virginia#262 · 1 in 2,369
  3. Tennessee#287 · 1 in 3,027
  4. Missouri#337 · 1 in 4,454
  5. Alabama#338 · 1 in 3,200

Best ever in a state: #169 in Maryland, 1937.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#22671 in 3,966
Virginia#26291 in 2,369
Tennessee#28781 in 3,027
Missouri#33761 in 4,454
Alabama#33881 in 3,200
Mississippi#34661 in 3,122
Illinois#37271 in 7,060
Ohio#39751 in 8,618
North Carolina#42161 in 5,483
California#45951 in 6,799
Pennsylvania#47251 in 13,820
Texas#80651 in 10,710
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Warner
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 132 spots since 2024 (#1,494 → #1,362)
  • 127 spots since 2020 (#1,489 → #1,362)
  • 508 spots since 2015 (#1,870 → #1,362)
  • Biggest jump: 343 spots in 1903 (#744 → #401)
  • Biggest drop: 191 spots in 1964 (#891 → #1,082)
Rise & fade · boys
19 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1899 at #362 (25 births)
  • Births halved by 1902, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 83 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 83 yrs · run 1880–1956
Share of babies · boys
1 in 4,248
  • Highest: 1 in 4,248 boys born in 1899 were named Warner (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 12,468 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 1930s
  • 15.4% of all boys named Warner (1,316) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s168#369 (1889)#455
1890s191#362 (1899)#448
1900s189#401 (1903)#545
1910s728#542 (1916)#603
1920s1,186#474 (1921)#583
1930s1,316#445 (1935)#506
1940s822#568 (1940)#714
1950s624#791 (1952)#933
1960s539#841 (1962)#1,064
1970s304#1,297 (1970)#1,703
1980s265#1,726 (1980)#2,156
1990s229#2,399 (1993)#3,118
2000s403#2,231 (2009)#2,705
2010s825#1,335 (2018)#1,892
2020s765#1,334 (2021)#1,422

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Warner in 1933

boys
#491
130 births · 1 in 7,627 boys

Top boys' names in 1933

  1. #1Robert54,221
  2. #2James51,112
  3. #3John46,224
  4. #4William39,049
  5. #5Richard31,331
  6. #6Charles28,991
  7. #7Donald28,450
  8. #8George18,356
  9. #9Joseph17,162
  10. #10Thomas16,508
  11. #491Warner130
More about 1933

boys

991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 7,627 of them was named Warner, which outranked 88.2% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Warner
  1. #488Fernando132
  2. #488Kevin132
  3. #490Saul131
  4. #491Warner130
  5. #491Rafael130
  6. #491Roman130
  7. #494Arturo129
  8. #495Bernie128
  9. #495Fletcher128

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 553Neville#1,548 → #995
  2. ↑ 401Cordell#1,286 → #885
  3. ↑ 381Hamilton#1,286 → #905
  4. ↑ 375Delano#677 → #302
  5. ↑ 313Jan#937 → #624
Fallers
  1. ↓ 568Hoover#793 → #1,361
  2. ↓ 541Porfirio#915 → #1,456
  3. ↓ 424Rosendo#937 → #1,361
  4. ↓ 381Alfonzo#821 → #1,202
  5. ↓ 368Hillard#862 → #1,230

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1933 →