Warren
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births · #240 for boys in 2025, 1,471 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1921 · 7,798 births
- Debut · boys
- 158 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 29 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 184,518since 1880
Warren over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 | #240 | 1,471 |
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | #263 | 1,329 |
| 2023 | #8,486 | 12 | #305 | 1,082 |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 | #333 | 1,014 |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 | #346 | 940 |
| 2020 | #11,090 | 8 | #343 | 936 |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #349 | 956 |
| 2018 | #11,427 | 8 | #338 | 995 |
| 2017 | — | #360 | 913 | |
| 2016 | — | #386 | 828 | |
| 2015 | — | #399 | 775 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #432 | 700 |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | #474 | 585 |
| 2012 | — | #473 | 577 | |
| 2011 | — | #498 | 524 | |
| 2010 | — | #484 | 538 | |
| 2009 | — | #458 | 595 | |
| 2008 | — | #514 | 530 | |
| 2007 | — | #513 | 514 | |
| 2006 | — | #497 | 521 | |
| 2005 | — | #550 | 435 | |
| 2004 | — | #529 | 451 | |
| 2003 | — | #493 | 501 | |
| 2002 | — | #527 | 427 | |
| 2001 | — | #515 | 440 | |
| 2000 | — | #437 | 545 | |
| 1999 | — | #467 | 486 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #424 | 546 |
| 1997 | — | #407 | 567 | |
| 1996 | — | #430 | 524 | |
| 1995 | — | #401 | 570 | |
| 1994 | — | #386 | 604 | |
| 1993 | — | #376 | 625 | |
| 1992 | — | #359 | 661 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #365 | 648 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | #339 | 728 |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #304 | 786 |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #331 | 650 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #301 | 714 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #279 | 756 |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #278 | 751 |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #260 | 799 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #254 | 820 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #267 | 803 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #265 | 819 |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | #268 | 812 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #259 | 815 |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #258 | 788 |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #253 | 803 |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | #242 | 828 |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #231 | 890 |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 | #225 | 936 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | #210 | 1,031 |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | #208 | 1,095 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #184 | 1,385 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #182 | 1,507 |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #183 | 1,521 |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | #173 | 1,548 |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 | #172 | 1,554 |
| 1966 | #2,752 | 20 | #167 | 1,625 |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #162 | 1,826 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #160 | 2,037 |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | #152 | 2,185 |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | #151 | 2,166 |
| 1961 | — | #157 | 2,082 | |
| 1960 | — | #165 | 2,017 | |
| 1959 | #3,827 | 11 | #157 | 2,178 |
| 1958 | #4,193 | 9 | #148 | 2,299 |
| 1957 | #3,930 | 10 | #147 | 2,333 |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #141 | 2,334 |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | #130 | 2,491 |
| 1954 | #3,019 | 14 | #126 | 2,621 |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | #124 | 2,637 |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | #117 | 2,638 |
| 1951 | — | #118 | 2,604 | |
| 1950 | #3,662 | 9 | #118 | 2,467 |
| 1949 | #3,393 | 10 | #115 | 2,527 |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | #109 | 2,657 |
| 1947 | #2,769 | 14 | #108 | 2,728 |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | #105 | 2,537 |
| 1945 | #2,742 | 11 | #106 | 2,183 |
| 1944 | #2,625 | 12 | #100 | 2,349 |
| 1943 | #2,861 | 11 | #102 | 2,480 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #97 | 2,423 |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #105 | 2,043 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | #110 | 1,813 |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #104 | 1,892 |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | #102 | 1,997 |
| 1937 | — | #106 | 1,822 | |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | #95 | 1,976 |
| 1935 | #1,917 | 17 | #97 | 1,994 |
| 1934 | #2,424 | 12 | #96 | 2,024 |
| 1933 | #2,688 | 10 | #99 | 1,809 |
| 1932 | #2,235 | 14 | #102 | 1,792 |
| 1931 | #1,686 | 21 | #99 | 1,834 |
| 1930 | #1,661 | 23 | #96 | 2,011 |
| 1929 | #1,393 | 30 | #92 | 2,037 |
| 1928 | #1,784 | 22 | #85 | 2,361 |
| 1927 | #2,026 | 19 | #79 | 2,555 |
| 1926 | #1,721 | 24 | #71 | 2,701 |
| 1925 | #1,576 | 28 | #66 | 2,945 |
| 1924 | #1,723 | 25 | #58 | 3,582 |
| 1923 | #1,556 | 28 | #43 | 4,820 |
| 1922 | #1,897 | 21 | #45 | 4,484 |
| 1921 | #1,577 | 28 | #24 | 7,798 |
| 1920 | #1,666 | 25 | #39 | 5,492 |
| 1919 | #1,989 | 18 | #83 | 2,180 |
| 1918 | #2,822 | 11 | #90 | 1,990 |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | #93 | 1,743 |
| 1916 | #3,258 | 8 | #102 | 1,549 |
| 1915 | #2,143 | 14 | #105 | 1,420 |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | #108 | 1,033 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 | #109 | 798 |
| 1912 | — | #107 | 697 | |
| 1911 | — | #113 | 338 | |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #122 | 264 |
| 1909 | — | #120 | 231 | |
| 1908 | — | #131 | 194 | |
| 1907 | — | #131 | 182 | |
| 1906 | — | #143 | 144 | |
| 1905 | — | #124 | 172 | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | #130 | 163 |
| 1903 | — | #112 | 173 | |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 | #129 | 149 |
| 1901 | — | #113 | 149 | |
| 1900 | — | #122 | 191 | |
| 1899 | — | #103 | 173 | |
| 1898 | — | #123 | 151 | |
| 1897 | — | #120 | 137 | |
| 1896 | — | #134 | 125 | |
| 1895 | — | #110 | 160 | |
| 1894 | — | #115 | 141 | |
| 1893 | — | #116 | 140 | |
| 1892 | — | #112 | 157 | |
| 1891 | — | #107 | 139 | |
| 1890 | — | #106 | 157 | |
| 1889 | — | #98 | 167 | |
| 1888 | — | #112 | 148 | |
| 1887 | — | #94 | 163 | |
| 1886 | — | #107 | 144 | |
| 1885 | — | #96 | 151 | |
| 1884 | — | #94 | 164 | |
| 1883 | — | #91 | 146 | |
| 1882 | — | #86 | 183 | |
| 1881 | — | #83 | 156 | |
| 1880 | — | #89 | 158 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Warren was already there! It came in at #89, and was given to 158 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1899, when fewer than 190 boys a year got the name.
Where Warren is popular in 1927
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Massachusetts#48 · 1 in 244
- Minnesota#51 · 1 in 201
- New Jersey#52 · 1 in 271
- Louisiana#54 · 1 in 239
- District of Columbia#55 · 1 in 289
Best ever in a state: #13 in Minnesota, 1921.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #48 | 139 | 1 in 244 |
| Minnesota | #51 | 105 | 1 in 201 |
| New Jersey | #52 | 111 | 1 in 271 |
| Louisiana | #54 | 85 | 1 in 239 |
| District of Columbia | #55 | 12 | 1 in 289 |
| Montana | #56 | 18 | 1 in 215 |
| New Hampshire | #61 | 12 | 1 in 271 |
| Nebraska | #63 | 45 | 1 in 260 |
| Virginia | #63 | 74 | 1 in 312 |
| California | #65 | 109 | 1 in 343 |
| Connecticut | #65 | 31 | 1 in 385 |
| Pennsylvania | #67 | 226 | 1 in 390 |
| Rhode Island | #68 | 16 | 1 in 334 |
| Florida | #71 | 41 | 1 in 356 |
| Illinois | #71 | 155 | 1 in 381 |
| Iowa | #72 | 65 | 1 in 304 |
| New York | #72 | 254 | 1 in 386 |
| Washington | #72 | 31 | 1 in 304 |
| Maine | #73 | 20 | 1 in 307 |
| Michigan | #75 | 105 | 1 in 400 |
| Kansas | #76 | 48 | 1 in 317 |
| Wisconsin | #77 | 74 | 1 in 331 |
| Maryland | #79 | 27 | 1 in 468 |
| Vermont | #80 | 7 | 1 in 366 |
| Colorado | #82 | 23 | 1 in 357 |
| Missouri | #82 | 73 | 1 in 399 |
| South Dakota | #82 | 18 | 1 in 311 |
| Ohio | #83 | 103 | 1 in 514 |
| Utah | #91 | 14 | 1 in 348 |
| Idaho | #93 | 11 | 1 in 326 |
| Indiana | #95 | 49 | 1 in 530 |
| Oregon | #95 | 15 | 1 in 388 |
| Oklahoma | #99 | 52 | 1 in 442 |
| South Carolina | #99 | 34 | 1 in 541 |
| North Dakota | #103 | 15 | 1 in 415 |
| West Virginia | #107 | 29 | 1 in 630 |
| Georgia | #112 | 45 | 1 in 633 |
| North Carolina | #123 | 53 | 1 in 663 |
| Kentucky | #139 | 30 | 1 in 887 |
| Mississippi | #146 | 26 | 1 in 794 |
| Arkansas | #149 | 22 | 1 in 820 |
| Tennessee | #151 | 25 | 1 in 1,001 |
| Alabama | #155 | 28 | 1 in 1,010 |
| Texas | #171 | 65 | 1 in 876 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Warren
- 23 spots since 2024 (#263 → #240)
- 103 spots since 2020 (#343 → #240)
- 159 spots since 2015 (#399 → #240)
- Biggest jump: 56 spots in 2009 (#514 → #458)
- Biggest drop: 78 spots in 2001 (#437 → #515)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1921 at #24 (7,798 births)
- Births halved by 1924, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1917–1931
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 141 boys born in 1921 were named Warren (0.71%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,161 boys born in 2025 (0.09%)
- 21.0% of all boys named Warren (38,775) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,580 | #83 (1881) | #95 |
| 1890s | 1,480 | #103 (1899) | #115 |
| 1900s | 1,748 | #112 (1903) | #126 |
| 1910s | 12,012 | #83 (1919) | #103 |
| 1920s | 38,775 | #24 (1921) | #60 |
| 1930s | 19,151 | #95 (1936) | #100 |
| 1940s | 23,740 | #97 (1942) | #106 |
| 1950s | 24,602 | #117 (1952) | #133 |
| 1960s | 18,561 | #151 (1962) | #164 |
| 1970s | 10,078 | #182 (1970) | #225 |
| 1980s | 7,710 | #254 (1983) | #281 |
| 1990s | 5,959 | #339 (1990) | #395 |
| 2000s | 4,959 | #437 (2000) | #503 |
| 2010s | 7,391 | #338 (2018) | #419 |
| 2020s | 6,772 | #240 (2025) | #305 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Warren in 1927
Top girls' names in 1927
Top boys' names in 1927
More about 1927
girls
1,192,431 girls got a published name in 1927; 1 in 62,760 of them was named Warren, which outranked 63.8% of the 5,602 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,935Willine20
- #1,935Willma20
- #1,935Wyoma20
- #2,026Warren19
- #2,026Ardyth19
- #2,026Arlee19
- #2,026Armelia19
- #2,095Abby18
- #2,095Alex18
- #2,095Allegra18
Tied with 68 names at #2,026; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,126,915 boys got a published name in 1927; 1 in 441 of them was named Warren, which outranked 98.4% of the 4,802 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.