Willis
Last seen for girls in 1989 at #12,362 · #2,539 for boys in 2025, 52 births
Given to boys 98.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 166 births
- Debut · boys
- 166 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 52,336since 1880
Willis over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,539 | 52 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,637 | 50 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,315 | 60 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,873 | 44 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,253 | 62 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,212 | 62 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,582 | 50 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,385 | 55 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,493 | 51 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,028 | 70 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,955 | 74 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,828 | 81 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,878 | 75 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,863 | 78 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,886 | 74 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,402 | 52 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,077 | 66 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,237 | 59 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,811 | 80 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,758 | 79 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,922 | 66 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,880 | 65 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,611 | 78 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,682 | 70 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,481 | 82 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,241 | 107 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,181 | 109 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,172 | 106 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,227 | 95 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,071 | 113 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,040 | 115 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,017 | 119 | |
| 1993 | — | #953 | 127 | |
| 1992 | — | #956 | 126 | |
| 1991 | — | #809 | 163 | |
| 1990 | — | #804 | 159 | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #770 | 166 |
| 1988 | — | #692 | 183 | |
| 1987 | — | #703 | 169 | |
| 1986 | — | #680 | 176 | |
| 1985 | — | #642 | 186 | |
| 1984 | — | #624 | 186 | |
| 1983 | — | #601 | 203 | |
| 1982 | — | #570 | 227 | |
| 1981 | — | #607 | 199 | |
| 1980 | — | #573 | 228 | |
| 1979 | — | #563 | 233 | |
| 1978 | — | #573 | 214 | |
| 1977 | — | #548 | 232 | |
| 1976 | — | #609 | 181 | |
| 1975 | — | #566 | 203 | |
| 1974 | — | #568 | 199 | |
| 1973 | — | #571 | 193 | |
| 1972 | — | #502 | 245 | |
| 1971 | — | #513 | 253 | |
| 1970 | — | #500 | 260 | |
| 1969 | — | #515 | 227 | |
| 1968 | — | #498 | 230 | |
| 1967 | — | #486 | 237 | |
| 1966 | — | #482 | 254 | |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | #449 | 300 |
| 1964 | — | #445 | 324 | |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | #432 | 340 |
| 1962 | — | #415 | 375 | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | #419 | 357 |
| 1960 | — | #389 | 414 | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | #395 | 407 |
| 1958 | — | #383 | 416 | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #361 | 447 |
| 1956 | #3,321 | 13 | #350 | 444 |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | #343 | 452 |
| 1954 | — | #337 | 447 | |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | #321 | 480 |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | #314 | 513 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #309 | 504 |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 | #313 | 476 |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #310 | 479 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #278 | 584 |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | #279 | 600 |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | #259 | 584 |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | #231 | 579 |
| 1944 | #3,378 | 8 | #219 | 623 |
| 1943 | #2,079 | 18 | #208 | 752 |
| 1942 | #2,537 | 13 | #219 | 666 |
| 1941 | #2,668 | 11 | #201 | 685 |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #209 | 609 |
| 1939 | #2,417 | 12 | #191 | 693 |
| 1938 | #2,340 | 13 | #187 | 731 |
| 1937 | #1,679 | 21 | #184 | 724 |
| 1936 | #1,873 | 17 | #175 | 768 |
| 1935 | #1,606 | 22 | #173 | 789 |
| 1934 | #1,771 | 19 | #166 | 867 |
| 1933 | #1,906 | 17 | #170 | 812 |
| 1932 | #1,685 | 21 | #165 | 911 |
| 1931 | #1,686 | 21 | #160 | 931 |
| 1930 | #1,934 | 18 | #159 | 965 |
| 1929 | #1,825 | 20 | #150 | 1,030 |
| 1928 | #1,837 | 21 | #148 | 1,085 |
| 1927 | #1,523 | 29 | #149 | 1,058 |
| 1926 | #1,449 | 31 | #140 | 1,233 |
| 1925 | #1,795 | 23 | #139 | 1,198 |
| 1924 | #2,409 | 15 | #136 | 1,261 |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | #138 | 1,183 |
| 1922 | #1,682 | 25 | #133 | 1,250 |
| 1921 | #1,723 | 25 | #133 | 1,209 |
| 1920 | #2,015 | 19 | #133 | 1,197 |
| 1919 | #1,445 | 29 | #131 | 1,136 |
| 1918 | #2,102 | 17 | #141 | 1,091 |
| 1917 | #1,507 | 25 | #140 | 954 |
| 1916 | #1,805 | 19 | #136 | 990 |
| 1915 | #2,050 | 15 | #137 | 950 |
| 1914 | #2,434 | 9 | #135 | 743 |
| 1913 | #2,034 | 10 | #135 | 573 |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 | #141 | 453 |
| 1911 | #1,241 | 14 | #143 | 233 |
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | #149 | 216 |
| 1909 | #1,290 | 11 | #139 | 189 |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | #146 | 161 |
| 1907 | — | #156 | 146 | |
| 1906 | — | #139 | 148 | |
| 1905 | — | #151 | 136 | |
| 1904 | — | #144 | 136 | |
| 1903 | — | #141 | 133 | |
| 1902 | — | #134 | 144 | |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | #149 | 106 |
| 1900 | — | #134 | 169 | |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | #128 | 126 |
| 1898 | — | #143 | 121 | |
| 1897 | — | #124 | 132 | |
| 1896 | — | #120 | 145 | |
| 1895 | — | #124 | 135 | |
| 1894 | — | #118 | 133 | |
| 1893 | — | #112 | 149 | |
| 1892 | — | #119 | 143 | |
| 1891 | — | #117 | 118 | |
| 1890 | — | #118 | 129 | |
| 1889 | — | #115 | 124 | |
| 1888 | — | #119 | 135 | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | #117 | 113 |
| 1886 | — | #103 | 150 | |
| 1885 | — | #106 | 133 | |
| 1884 | — | #100 | 151 | |
| 1883 | — | #103 | 131 | |
| 1882 | — | #104 | 143 | |
| 1881 | — | #93 | 142 | |
| 1880 | — | #86 | 166 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Willis was already there! It came in at #86, and was given to 166 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2017–2025, when fewer than 63 boys a year got the name.
Where Willis is popular in 1935
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#99 · 1 in 414
- Montana#109 · 1 in 557
- North Carolina#118 · 1 in 620
- Mississippi#121 · 1 in 658
- West Virginia#125 · 1 in 747
Best ever in a state: #57 in Delaware, 1919.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #99 | 13 | 1 in 414 |
| Montana | #109 | 7 | 1 in 557 |
| North Carolina | #118 | 57 | 1 in 620 |
| Mississippi | #121 | 31 | 1 in 658 |
| West Virginia | #125 | 24 | 1 in 747 |
| Louisiana | #128 | 29 | 1 in 656 |
| Kentucky | #135 | 34 | 1 in 769 |
| Missouri | #138 | 33 | 1 in 812 |
| Alabama | #139 | 34 | 1 in 809 |
| Tennessee | #139 | 28 | 1 in 935 |
| North Dakota | #140 | 8 | 1 in 727 |
| Michigan | #141 | 33 | 1 in 1,193 |
| Nebraska | #141 | 13 | 1 in 784 |
| Kansas | #142 | 17 | 1 in 788 |
| Minnesota | #142 | 21 | 1 in 949 |
| Florida | #146 | 15 | 1 in 825 |
| Maine | #149 | 8 | 1 in 783 |
| Arkansas | #150 | 22 | 1 in 834 |
| Georgia | #150 | 32 | 1 in 894 |
| Ohio | #150 | 41 | 1 in 1,138 |
| Oklahoma | #154 | 24 | 1 in 908 |
| Washington | #160 | 9 | 1 in 1,077 |
| Indiana | #162 | 19 | 1 in 1,239 |
| Virginia | #172 | 22 | 1 in 995 |
| Pennsylvania | #177 | 34 | 1 in 2,124 |
| Iowa | #187 | 12 | 1 in 1,582 |
| Massachusetts | #199 | 8 | 1 in 3,521 |
| South Carolina | #212 | 12 | 1 in 1,578 |
| Illinois | #213 | 23 | 1 in 2,258 |
| New Jersey | #226 | 7 | 1 in 3,495 |
| Texas | #229 | 45 | 1 in 1,267 |
| Wisconsin | #232 | 8 | 1 in 2,949 |
| California | #249 | 17 | 1 in 2,158 |
| New York | #255 | 22 | 1 in 3,818 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Willis
- 98 spots since 2024 (#2,637 → #2,539)
- 327 spots since 2020 (#2,212 → #2,539)
- 584 spots since 2015 (#1,955 → #2,539)
- Biggest jump: 61 spots in 1977 (#609 → #548)
- Biggest drop: 147 spots in 1992 (#809 → #956)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #86 (166 births)
- Births halved by 2001, 121 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1880–1881
- Top 1,000: 114 yrs · run 1880–1993
- Highest: 1 in 666 boys born in 1880 were named Willis (0.15%)
- Latest: 1 in 32,848 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 22.4% of all boys named Willis (11,704) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,388 | #86 (1880) | #105 |
| 1890s | 1,331 | #112 (1893) | #122 |
| 1900s | 1,468 | #134 (1900) | #143 |
| 1910s | 7,339 | #131 (1919) | #139 |
| 1920s | 11,704 | #133 (1922) | #140 |
| 1930s | 8,191 | #159 (1930) | #173 |
| 1940s | 6,161 | #201 (1941) | #241 |
| 1950s | 4,586 | #309 (1951) | #343 |
| 1960s | 3,058 | #389 (1960) | #453 |
| 1970s | 2,213 | #500 (1970) | #551 |
| 1980s | 1,923 | #570 (1982) | #646 |
| 1990s | 1,232 | #804 (1990) | #1,023 |
| 2000s | 752 | #1,241 (2000) | #1,770 |
| 2010s | 660 | #1,828 (2014) | #2,130 |
| 2020s | 330 | #2,212 (2020) | #2,472 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Willis in 1935
Top girls' names in 1935
Top boys' names in 1935
More about 1935
girls
1,048,577 girls got a published name in 1935; 1 in 47,663 of them was named Willis, which outranked 67.2% of the 4,893 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,550Vashti23
- #1,550Wonda23
- #1,550Zadie23
- #1,606Willis22
- #1,606Arbutus22
- #1,606Arnita22
- #1,606Azalee22
- #1,663Aggie21
- #1,663Antionette21
- #1,663Ara21
Tied with 56 names at #1,606; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 2,736Norita#3,449 → #713
- ↑ 1,073Shelby#1,913 → #840
- ↑ 672Darla#1,344 → #672
- ↑ 396Shirleyann#1,292 → #896
- ↑ 375Loris#1,236 → #861
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,041,351 boys got a published name in 1935; 1 in 1,320 of them was named Willis, which outranked 95.8% of the 4,146 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.