Willow
#44 for girls in 2025, 4,763 births · #4,396 for boys in 2025, 23 births
Given to girls 99.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 5,072 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 10 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 65,095since 1890
Willow over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #44 | 4,763 | #4,396 | 23 |
| 2024 | #41 | 4,672 | #3,693 | 30 |
| 2023 | #41 | 4,765 | #2,693 | 48 |
| 2022 | #37 | 5,072 | #3,100 | 39 |
| 2021 | #39 | 5,195 | #3,242 | 36 |
| 2020 | #48 | 4,401 | #4,855 | 19 |
| 2019 | #45 | 4,609 | #3,899 | 27 |
| 2018 | #60 | 3,933 | #3,891 | 27 |
| 2017 | #80 | 3,569 | #6,338 | 13 |
| 2016 | #96 | 3,125 | #5,318 | 17 |
| 2015 | #111 | 2,811 | #5,746 | 15 |
| 2014 | #136 | 2,410 | #5,733 | 15 |
| 2013 | #155 | 2,079 | #4,621 | 20 |
| 2012 | #171 | 1,839 | #5,720 | 15 |
| 2011 | #199 | 1,575 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #288 | 1,122 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #312 | 1,054 | — | |
| 2008 | #405 | 797 | — | |
| 2007 | #425 | 771 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #523 | 578 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #532 | 542 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #548 | 519 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #525 | 537 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #504 | 546 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #664 | 379 | — | |
| 2000 | #757 | 301 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #727 | 310 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | #852 | 250 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #1,110 | 169 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #1,348 | 125 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #1,640 | 90 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,744 | 84 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,451 | 51 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,386 | 54 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #2,320 | 55 | #7,271 | 6 |
| 1990 | #3,623 | 29 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,045 | 35 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,585 | 26 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,983 | 21 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,601 | 37 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,915 | 30 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,721 | 32 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,414 | 40 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,375 | 41 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,805 | 60 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,753 | 62 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #1,502 | 75 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,637 | 64 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,535 | 66 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,756 | 53 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,688 | 54 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,913 | 43 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,311 | 32 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,340 | 33 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,208 | 20 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,300 | 10 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,400 | 14 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,825 | 20 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,782 | 12 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,608 | 13 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,436 | 13 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,929 | 16 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,411 | 21 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,325 | 12 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,595 | 17 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,937 | 13 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,329 | 18 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,993 | 24 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,094 | 20 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,825 | 21 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,742 | 23 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,447 | 14 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,666 | 12 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,190 | 15 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,029 | 16 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,797 | 19 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,650 | 22 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,507 | 24 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,206 | 14 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,556 | 23 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,513 | 24 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,488 | 26 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,549 | 24 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,875 | 19 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,526 | 26 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,425 | 30 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,771 | 23 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,325 | 35 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,609 | 27 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,679 | 26 | #3,867 | 6 |
| 1923 | #1,598 | 27 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,821 | 23 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,952 | 20 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,289 | 15 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,879 | 10 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,739 | 20 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,523 | 23 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,125 | 11 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,766 | 12 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,439 | 9 | — | |
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,416 | 8 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 | — | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Willow! It came in at #1,338, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1890–1903, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Willow is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#17 · 1 in 127
- Wyoming#19 · 1 in 89
- Vermont#27 · 1 in 101
- Maine#27 · 1 in 129
- Arkansas#35 · 1 in 217
Best ever in a state: #2 in West Virginia, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #17 | 48 | 1 in 127 |
| Wyoming | #19 | 13 | 1 in 89 |
| Maine | #27 | 28 | 1 in 129 |
| Vermont | #27 | 11 | 1 in 101 |
| Arkansas | #35 | 52 | 1 in 217 |
| Indiana | #36 | 125 | 1 in 242 |
| Kentucky | #36 | 90 | 1 in 203 |
| South Dakota | #40 | 18 | 1 in 172 |
| Alaska | #41 | 15 | 1 in 160 |
| Missouri | #41 | 113 | 1 in 240 |
| New Hampshire | #43 | 23 | 1 in 155 |
| Tennessee | #44 | 119 | 1 in 261 |
| Iowa | #46 | 56 | 1 in 232 |
| Oklahoma | #49 | 62 | 1 in 271 |
| Ohio | #51 | 170 | 1 in 306 |
| Kansas | #58 | 44 | 1 in 287 |
| Oregon | #59 | 53 | 1 in 287 |
| South Carolina | #63 | 56 | 1 in 319 |
| Michigan | #64 | 118 | 1 in 357 |
| Wisconsin | #67 | 69 | 1 in 338 |
| Pennsylvania | #69 | 145 | 1 in 358 |
| Washington | #72 | 85 | 1 in 378 |
| Minnesota | #73 | 68 | 1 in 361 |
| North Dakota | #75 | 13 | 1 in 255 |
| Idaho | #78 | 20 | 1 in 322 |
| North Carolina | #80 | 115 | 1 in 394 |
| Alabama | #86 | 49 | 1 in 395 |
| Colorado | #88 | 57 | 1 in 413 |
| Virginia | #88 | 92 | 1 in 404 |
| Mississippi | #92 | 28 | 1 in 396 |
| Georgia | #97 | 94 | 1 in 511 |
| Nebraska | #98 | 21 | 1 in 385 |
| Hawaii | #106 | 9 | 1 in 347 |
| Maryland | #115 | 51 | 1 in 471 |
| Rhode Island | #115 | 8 | 1 in 357 |
| Arizona | #121 | 59 | 1 in 524 |
| Florida | #126 | 135 | 1 in 642 |
| Connecticut | #135 | 23 | 1 in 536 |
| Utah | #135 | 33 | 1 in 547 |
| Illinois | #138 | 90 | 1 in 640 |
| Nevada | #138 | 21 | 1 in 531 |
| District of Columbia | #153 | 8 | 1 in 447 |
| New York | #154 | 117 | 1 in 768 |
| Louisiana | #165 | 32 | 1 in 656 |
| Massachusetts | #169 | 35 | 1 in 728 |
| New Mexico | #176 | 10 | 1 in 633 |
| California | #186 | 216 | 1 in 943 |
| Texas | #208 | 164 | 1 in 1,020 |
| New Jersey | #247 | 33 | 1 in 1,108 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Willow
- 3 spots since 2024 (#41 → #44)
- 4 spots since 2020 (#48 → #44)
- 67 spots since 2015 (#111 → #44)
- Biggest jump: 258 spots in 1998 (#1,110 → #852)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 2000 (#727 → #757)
- Debuted 1890
- Peaked 2022 at #37 (5,072 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
- Highest: 1 in 316 girls born in 2021 were named Willow (0.32%)
- Latest: 1 in 337 girls born in 2025 (0.30%)
- Its best rank, #37 in 2022, was only 1 in 323 (0.31%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 44.3% of all girls named Willow (28,868) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,338 (1890) | #1,338 |
| 1900s | 40 | #1,364 (1904) | #1,714 |
| 1910s | 111 | #1,523 (1915) | #2,167 |
| 1920s | 252 | #1,325 (1926) | #1,709 |
| 1930s | 208 | #1,488 (1932) | #1,746 |
| 1940s | 175 | #1,742 (1944) | #2,231 |
| 1950s | 138 | #2,411 (1955) | #3,164 |
| 1960s | 139 | #2,825 (1964) | #3,565 |
| 1970s | 502 | #1,502 (1978) | #1,964 |
| 1980s | 344 | #1,805 (1980) | #2,920 |
| 1990s | 1,217 | #727 (1999) | #1,820 |
| 2000s | 6,024 | #312 (2009) | #520 |
| 2010s | 27,072 | #45 (2019) | #134 |
| 2020s | 28,868 | #37 (2022) | #42 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Willow in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
Top boys' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 567 of them was named Willow, which outranked 99.5% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,897,738 boys got a published name in 2016; 1 in 111,632 of them was named Willow, which outranked 62.6% of the 14,207 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #5,124Ziyan18
- #5,124Zohaib18
- #5,124Zorawar18
- #5,318Willow17
- #5,318Aarian17
- #5,318Aasir17
- #5,318Abijah17
- #5,555Advit16
- #5,555Aeon16
- #5,555Afton16
Tied with 236 names at #5,318; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.