Wilma

#3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births · Last seen for boys in 1961 at #2,706
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1925 · 4,175 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
29 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
140,101
since 1880

Wilma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201974peak #62, 1925girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,64541—
2024#3,96337—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,59543—
2021#4,41331—
2020#3,77838—
2019#4,00636—
2018#3,61442—
2017#4,22034—
2016#5,62223—
2015#4,40332—
2014#6,20720—
2013#4,42232—
2012#5,39825—
2011#4,91528—
2010#4,97428—
2009#4,67731—
2008#5,27927—
2007#5,37726—
2006#5,70923—
2005#4,95826—
2004#4,60129—
2003#4,66827—
2002#3,73035—
2001#4,20929—
2000#3,88632—
1999#3,24539—
1998#3,57333—
1997#3,22436—
1996#3,50532—
1995#2,65046—
1994#2,93540—
1993#2,60047—
1992#2,68745—
1991#2,84341—
1990#2,17459—
1989#2,22254—
1988#2,21651—
1987#2,53140—
1986#1,95256—
1985#2,08251—
1984#1,92254—
1983#1,68965—
1982#1,47481—
1981#1,52878—
1980#1,50279—
1979#1,45483—
1978#1,34788—
1977#1,37082—
1976#1,145102—
1975#1,074109—
1974#1,042114—
1973#934130—
1972#888142—
1971#777187—
1970#731202—
1969#630249—
1968#648224—
1967#565281—
1966#515339—
1965#477396—
1964#456458—
1963#408556—
1962#396582—
1961#355717#2,70610
1960#362724—
1959#349754#3,9885
1958#300890—
1957#282986#3,9935
1956#2531,086—
1955#2481,100—
1954#2231,303#3,4526
1953#2071,435#3,4256
1952#2021,423#2,37611
1951#1781,644#3,7145
1950#1711,655#3,0217
1949#1671,726—
1948#1641,742#2,6089
1947#1521,910#3,0967
1946#1441,914#2,27111
1945#1281,890#2,24210
1944#1242,128#1,68317
1943#1202,377#2,18212
1942#1142,457#1,62919
1941#1062,427#1,44622
1940#932,621#1,47121
1939#872,701#1,29726
1938#852,871#1,27527
1937#802,977#1,34425
1936#783,123#1,96413
1935#703,361#1,45322
1934#733,311#1,32326
1933#663,417#1,49821
1932#653,611#1,54821
1931#693,741#1,36126
1930#684,075#1,39927
1929#664,007#1,31229
1928#693,937#1,52224
1927#684,153#1,56124
1926#674,054#1,66121
1925#624,175#1,42527
1924#674,066#1,83919
1923#743,706#1,50225
1922#773,535#2,34713
1921#723,824#1,70321
1920#783,670#1,96617
1919#863,170#2,06315
1918#823,298#1,64821
1917#823,071#1,75518
1916#822,962#1,69818
1915#802,773#3,0827
1914#951,788#2,6517
1913#921,469#1,36515
1912#991,241#2,2696
1911#102914—
1910#118698—
1909#112645#1,4405
1908#113630#1,3735
1907#125525—
1906#146408—
1905#158357—
1904#154352—
1903#168293—
1902#173272—
1901#178245—
1900#187285—
1899#181235—
1898#232159—
1897#245131—
1896#286105—
1895#28199—
1894#29090—
1893#30581—
1892#29286—
1891#32559—
1890#31564—
1889#38140—
1888#40337—
1887#47122—
1886#42426—
1885#43823—
1884#50117—
1883#45118—
1882#49314—
1881#53910—
1880#8365—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Wilma was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Wilma is popular in 1974

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,137 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 13,943 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMINew York: #912 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 9,377 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #535 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,986 girlsINOhio: #680 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 7,791 girlsOHPennsylvania: #846 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 11,141 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNEMissouri: #618 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,934 girlsMOKentucky: #317 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,071 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedARTennessee: #585 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,497 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #594 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,640 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMSAlabama: #496 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,756 girlsALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedHITexas: #1,429 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 19,088 girlsTXFlorida: #916 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,740 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Kentucky#317 · 1 in 2,071
  2. Alabama#496 · 1 in 3,756
  3. Indiana#535 · 1 in 4,986
  4. Tennessee#585 · 1 in 5,497
  5. North Carolina#594 · 1 in 5,640

Best ever in a state: #12 in Oklahoma, 1925.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Kentucky#317111 in 2,071
Alabama#49661 in 3,756
Indiana#53571 in 4,986
Tennessee#58551 in 5,497
North Carolina#59461 in 5,640
Missouri#61851 in 5,934
Ohio#68091 in 7,791
Pennsylvania#84661 in 11,141
New York#912111 in 9,377
Florida#91651 in 8,740
Illinois#1,13751 in 13,943
Texas#1,42951 in 19,088
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Wilma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 318 spots since 2024 (#3,963 → #3,645)
  • 133 spots since 2020 (#3,778 → #3,645)
  • 758 spots since 2015 (#4,403 → #3,645)
  • Biggest jump: 297 spots in 1881 (#836 → #539)
  • Biggest drop: 111 spots in 1972 (#777 → #888)
Rise & fade · girls
45 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1925 at #62 (4,175 births)
  • Births halved by 1945, 20 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 29 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1912–1940
  • Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 276
  • Highest: 1 in 276 girls born in 1930 were named Wilma (0.36%)
  • Latest: 1 in 39,202 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #62 in 1925, was only 1 in 292 (0.34%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 27.9% of all girls named Wilma (39,127) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s212#381 (1889)#494
1890s1,109#181 (1899)#275
1900s4,012#112 (1909)#151
1910s21,384#80 (1915)#92
1920s39,127#62 (1925)#70
1930s33,188#65 (1932)#74
1940s21,192#93 (1940)#131
1950s12,276#171 (1950)#241
1960s4,526#355 (1961)#481
1970s1,239#731 (1970)#1,076
1980s609#1,474 (1982)#1,912
1990s418#2,174 (1990)#2,944
2000s285#3,730 (2002)#4,709
2010s300#3,614 (2018)#4,778
2020s224#3,595 (2022)#3,931

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Wilma in 1974

girls
#1,042
114 births · 1 in 12,873 girls

Top girls' names in 1974

  1. #1Jennifer63,107
  2. #2Amy29,566
  3. #3Michelle25,826
  4. #4Heather23,179
  5. #5Angela22,803
  6. #6Kimberly22,427
  7. #7Melissa22,166
  8. #8Lisa19,778
  9. #9Stephanie16,984
  10. #10Rebecca15,163
  11. #1,042Wilma114
More about 1974

girls

1,467,534 girls got a published name in 1974; 1 in 12,873 of them was named Wilma, which outranked 89.8% of the 10,247 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Wilma
  1. #1,039Elvia115
  2. #1,039Shandra115
  3. #1,039Shara115
  4. #1,042Wilma114
  5. #1,042Dori114
  6. #1,042Karena114
  7. #1,042Nicola114
  8. #1,048Annamarie113
  9. #1,048Chana113
  10. #1,048Francis113

Tied with 5 names at #1,042; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1973
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,440Nakia#6,666 → #226
  2. ↑ 5,329Nikia#6,080 → #751
  3. ↑ 1,994Luciana#2,914 → #920
  4. ↑ 1,556Cortney#2,349 → #793
  5. ↑ 1,213Nia#1,885 → #672
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,251Contina#962 → #2,213
  2. ↓ 396Pam#990 → #1,386
  3. ↓ 376Tracee#536 → #912
  4. ↓ 364Cher#760 → #1,124
  5. ↓ 314Richard#904 → #1,218

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1974 →