Wilma

#3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births · Last seen for boys in 1961 at #2,706
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1925 · 4,175 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
29 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
140,101
since 1880

Wilma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201981peak #62, 1925girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,64541—
2024#3,96337—
2023#4,19134—
2022#3,59543—
2021#4,41331—
2020#3,77838—
2019#4,00636—
2018#3,61442—
2017#4,22034—
2016#5,62223—
2015#4,40332—
2014#6,20720—
2013#4,42232—
2012#5,39825—
2011#4,91528—
2010#4,97428—
2009#4,67731—
2008#5,27927—
2007#5,37726—
2006#5,70923—
2005#4,95826—
2004#4,60129—
2003#4,66827—
2002#3,73035—
2001#4,20929—
2000#3,88632—
1999#3,24539—
1998#3,57333—
1997#3,22436—
1996#3,50532—
1995#2,65046—
1994#2,93540—
1993#2,60047—
1992#2,68745—
1991#2,84341—
1990#2,17459—
1989#2,22254—
1988#2,21651—
1987#2,53140—
1986#1,95256—
1985#2,08251—
1984#1,92254—
1983#1,68965—
1982#1,47481—
1981#1,52878—
1980#1,50279—
1979#1,45483—
1978#1,34788—
1977#1,37082—
1976#1,145102—
1975#1,074109—
1974#1,042114—
1973#934130—
1972#888142—
1971#777187—
1970#731202—
1969#630249—
1968#648224—
1967#565281—
1966#515339—
1965#477396—
1964#456458—
1963#408556—
1962#396582—
1961#355717#2,70610
1960#362724—
1959#349754#3,9885
1958#300890—
1957#282986#3,9935
1956#2531,086—
1955#2481,100—
1954#2231,303#3,4526
1953#2071,435#3,4256
1952#2021,423#2,37611
1951#1781,644#3,7145
1950#1711,655#3,0217
1949#1671,726—
1948#1641,742#2,6089
1947#1521,910#3,0967
1946#1441,914#2,27111
1945#1281,890#2,24210
1944#1242,128#1,68317
1943#1202,377#2,18212
1942#1142,457#1,62919
1941#1062,427#1,44622
1940#932,621#1,47121
1939#872,701#1,29726
1938#852,871#1,27527
1937#802,977#1,34425
1936#783,123#1,96413
1935#703,361#1,45322
1934#733,311#1,32326
1933#663,417#1,49821
1932#653,611#1,54821
1931#693,741#1,36126
1930#684,075#1,39927
1929#664,007#1,31229
1928#693,937#1,52224
1927#684,153#1,56124
1926#674,054#1,66121
1925#624,175#1,42527
1924#674,066#1,83919
1923#743,706#1,50225
1922#773,535#2,34713
1921#723,824#1,70321
1920#783,670#1,96617
1919#863,170#2,06315
1918#823,298#1,64821
1917#823,071#1,75518
1916#822,962#1,69818
1915#802,773#3,0827
1914#951,788#2,6517
1913#921,469#1,36515
1912#991,241#2,2696
1911#102914—
1910#118698—
1909#112645#1,4405
1908#113630#1,3735
1907#125525—
1906#146408—
1905#158357—
1904#154352—
1903#168293—
1902#173272—
1901#178245—
1900#187285—
1899#181235—
1898#232159—
1897#245131—
1896#286105—
1895#28199—
1894#29090—
1893#30581—
1892#29286—
1891#32559—
1890#31564—
1889#38140—
1888#40337—
1887#47122—
1886#42426—
1885#43823—
1884#50117—
1883#45118—
1882#49314—
1881#53910—
1880#8365—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Wilma was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Wilma is popular in 1981

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,102 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 12,525 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMINew York: #1,591 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 20,267 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedIAIndiana: #426 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,490 girlsINOhio: #581 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 6,021 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #716 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,211 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMOKentucky: #498 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,774 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedHITexas: #1,305 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 15,467 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Wilma, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Indiana#426 · 1 in 3,490
  2. Kentucky#498 · 1 in 4,774
  3. Ohio#581 · 1 in 6,021
  4. New Jersey#716 · 1 in 6,211
  5. Illinois#1,102 · 1 in 12,525

Best ever in a state: #12 in Oklahoma, 1925.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Indiana#426101 in 3,490
Kentucky#49851 in 4,774
Ohio#581121 in 6,021
New Jersey#71661 in 6,211
Illinois#1,10261 in 12,525
Texas#1,30581 in 15,467
New York#1,59151 in 20,267
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Wilma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 318 spots since 2024 (#3,963 → #3,645)
  • 133 spots since 2020 (#3,778 → #3,645)
  • 758 spots since 2015 (#4,403 → #3,645)
  • Biggest jump: 297 spots in 1881 (#836 → #539)
  • Biggest drop: 111 spots in 1972 (#777 → #888)
Rise & fade · girls
45 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1925 at #62 (4,175 births)
  • Births halved by 1945, 20 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 29 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1912–1940
  • Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1880–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 276
  • Highest: 1 in 276 girls born in 1930 were named Wilma (0.36%)
  • Latest: 1 in 39,202 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #62 in 1925, was only 1 in 292 (0.34%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 27.9% of all girls named Wilma (39,127) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s212#381 (1889)#494
1890s1,109#181 (1899)#275
1900s4,012#112 (1909)#151
1910s21,384#80 (1915)#92
1920s39,127#62 (1925)#70
1930s33,188#65 (1932)#74
1940s21,192#93 (1940)#131
1950s12,276#171 (1950)#241
1960s4,526#355 (1961)#481
1970s1,239#731 (1970)#1,076
1980s609#1,474 (1982)#1,912
1990s418#2,174 (1990)#2,944
2000s285#3,730 (2002)#4,709
2010s300#3,614 (2018)#4,778
2020s224#3,595 (2022)#3,931

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Wilma in 1981

girls
#1,528
78 births · 1 in 21,385 girls

Top girls' names in 1981

  1. #1Jennifer57,046
  2. #2Jessica42,531
  3. #3Amanda34,372
  4. #4Sarah28,175
  5. #5Melissa28,005
  6. #6Amy20,345
  7. #7Nicole20,310
  8. #8Stephanie20,212
  9. #9Elizabeth20,168
  10. #10Heather17,946
  11. #1,528Wilma78
More about 1981

girls

1,668,060 girls got a published name in 1981; 1 in 21,385 of them was named Wilma, which outranked 87.5% of the 12,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Wilma
  1. #1,515Sarai79
  2. #1,515Shawnda79
  3. #1,515Shyla79
  4. #1,528Wilma78
  5. #1,528Akilah78
  6. #1,528Amina78
  7. #1,528Charise78
  8. #1,549Adam77
  9. #1,549Barbra77
  10. #1,549Christel77

Tied with 20 names at #1,528; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1980
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,850Tashina#4,743 → #893
  2. ↑ 2,742Krystle#3,215 → #473
  3. ↑ 1,800Tierra#2,342 → #542
  4. ↑ 1,398Martine#2,189 → #791
  5. ↑ 999Nereida#1,981 → #982
Fallers
  1. ↓ 764Kylene#990 → #1,754
  2. ↓ 607Renada#708 → #1,315
  3. ↓ 560Ashanti#822 → #1,382
  4. ↓ 399Renata#336 → #735
  5. ↓ 395Tracee#959 → #1,354

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1981 →