Wrenley
- #158 for girls in 2025, 1,858 births
- #7,194 for boys in 2025, 11 births
- Given to girls 98.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 1,990 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,948since 2013
Wrenley over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Wrenley has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #158 | 1,858 | #7,194 | 11 |
| 2024 | #148 | 1,990 | #5,904 | 15 |
| 2023 | #175 | 1,659 | #5,666 | 16 |
| 2022 | #284 | 1,119 | #5,633 | 16 |
| 2021 | #497 | 630 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #893 | 297 | #7,034 | 11 |
| 2019 | #1,209 | 193 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #2,478 | 71 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2017 | #2,546 | 69 | #7,095 | 11 |
| 2016 | #5,622 | 23 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | — | |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | — | |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
2013
The first year at least five girls were named Wrenley! It came in at #11,969, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2013, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Wrenley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- South Dakota#28 · 1 in 161
- West Virginia#30 · 1 in 159
- Kentucky#35 · 1 in 218
- North Dakota#37 · 1 in 159
- Nebraska#40 · 1 in 209
Best ever in a state: #19 in West Virginia, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #28 | 19 | 1 in 161 |
| West Virginia | #30 | 32 | 1 in 159 |
| Kentucky | #35 | 79 | 1 in 218 |
| North Dakota | #37 | 17 | 1 in 159 |
| Nebraska | #40 | 34 | 1 in 209 |
| Indiana | #41 | 105 | 1 in 266 |
| Missouri | #42 | 91 | 1 in 267 |
| Kansas | #54 | 44 | 1 in 268 |
| Oklahoma | #55 | 50 | 1 in 296 |
| Iowa | #56 | 42 | 1 in 280 |
| Arkansas | #65 | 38 | 1 in 279 |
| Tennessee | #75 | 86 | 1 in 373 |
| Montana | #79 | 11 | 1 in 257 |
| Mississippi | #80 | 26 | 1 in 342 |
| Idaho | #85 | 23 | 1 in 311 |
| Ohio | #87 | 110 | 1 in 430 |
| South Carolina | #90 | 46 | 1 in 398 |
| Wisconsin | #93 | 50 | 1 in 405 |
| Louisiana | #95 | 39 | 1 in 420 |
| Alabama | #108 | 40 | 1 in 458 |
| Utah | #113 | 38 | 1 in 449 |
| Alaska | #134 | 5 | 1 in 331 |
| Minnesota | #150 | 36 | 1 in 597 |
| North Carolina | #150 | 68 | 1 in 684 |
| Oregon | #158 | 22 | 1 in 593 |
| New Mexico | #159 | 9 | 1 in 519 |
| Georgia | #163 | 61 | 1 in 741 |
| Illinois | #165 | 60 | 1 in 739 |
| Michigan | #172 | 50 | 1 in 715 |
| New Hampshire | #174 | 7 | 1 in 542 |
| Maine | #176 | 6 | 1 in 519 |
| Pennsylvania | #176 | 63 | 1 in 741 |
| Virginia | #228 | 35 | 1 in 964 |
| Arizona | #233 | 29 | 1 in 973 |
| Colorado | #254 | 25 | 1 in 933 |
| Florida | #267 | 71 | 1 in 1,222 |
| Texas | #274 | 126 | 1 in 1,274 |
| Maryland | #283 | 18 | 1 in 1,110 |
| Washington | #286 | 25 | 1 in 1,154 |
| New York | #442 | 39 | 1 in 2,008 |
| Connecticut | #459 | 6 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Massachusetts | #481 | 11 | 1 in 2,185 |
| California | #662 | 47 | 1 in 3,441 |
| New Jersey | #846 | 8 | 1 in 4,438 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Wrenley
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 10 spots since 2024 (#148 → #158)
- 735 spots since 2020 (#893 → #158)
- Biggest jump: 396 spots in 2021
- Biggest drop: 10 spots in 2025
Rise & fade · girls
11 yrs to peak
- Debuted 2013
- Peaked 2024 at #148 (1,990 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 6 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 6 yrs · run 2020–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 814
- Highest: 1 in 814 girls born in 2024 were named Wrenley (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 865 girls born in 2025 (0.12%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 95.0% of all girls named Wrenley (7,553) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 395 | #1,209 (2019) | #5,576 |
| 2020s | 7,553 | #148 (2024) | #359 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Wrenley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: