Wynell
- Last seen for girls in 1976 at #9,284
- Last seen for boys in 1977 at #5,123
- Given to girls 99.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1932 · 41 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,027since 1913
Wynell over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Wynell has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,437 | 9 | — | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,489 | 12 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,122 | 25 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,301 | 21 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,589 | 15 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,392 | 16 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,060 | 17 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,867 | 21 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,751 | 24 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,760 | 23 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,750 | 21 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,682 | 22 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,585 | 23 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,505 | 25 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,234 | 34 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,206 | 35 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,162 | 37 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,205 | 35 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,244 | 33 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,116 | 41 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,127 | 40 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,347 | 32 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,223 | 39 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,404 | 33 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,388 | 33 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,576 | 28 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,062 | 19 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,782 | 23 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,612 | 13 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,195 | 17 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,515 | 13 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,674 | 12 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,428 | 13 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,031 | 9 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1913
The first year at least five girls were named Wynell! It came in at #3,187, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1913–1914, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Wynell is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Wynell in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Wynell
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1976
Rise & fade · girls
19 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 1932 at #1,116 (41 births)
- Births halved by 1945, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 26,028
- Highest: 1 in 26,028 girls born in 1932 were named Wynell (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 293,020 girls born in 1976 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
- 32.6% of all girls named Wynell (335) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 60 | #2,428 (1917) | #2,828 |
| 1920s | 244 | #1,223 (1928) | #1,826 |
| 1930s | 335 | #1,116 (1932) | #1,273 |
| 1940s | 194 | #1,682 (1940) | #2,062 |
| 1950s | 133 | #2,122 (1954) | #3,508 |
| 1960s | 38 | #4,239 (1961) | #5,134 |
| 1970s | 23 | #6,619 (1971) | #7,849 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Wynell ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: