Yasmin
- #955 for girls in 2025, 269 births
- Last seen for boys in 2010 at #12,231
- Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2006 · 1,018 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 21,747since 1949
Yasmin over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Yasmin has never cracked the top 300 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #955 | 269 | — | |
| 2024 | #914 | 290 | — | |
| 2023 | #857 | 311 | — | |
| 2022 | #907 | 304 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,035 | 245 | — | |
| 2020 | #976 | 261 | — | |
| 2019 | #947 | 279 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,026 | 252 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,030 | 251 | — | |
| 2016 | #930 | 295 | — | |
| 2015 | #930 | 292 | — | |
| 2014 | #898 | 302 | — | |
| 2013 | #817 | 329 | — | |
| 2012 | #733 | 378 | — | |
| 2011 | #661 | 429 | — | |
| 2010 | #582 | 504 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #479 | 644 | — | |
| 2008 | #398 | 807 | — | |
| 2007 | #359 | 906 | #10,921 | 6 |
| 2006 | #324 | 1,018 | — | |
| 2005 | #332 | 963 | — | |
| 2004 | #338 | 950 | — | |
| 2003 | #354 | 873 | — | |
| 2002 | #352 | 844 | — | |
| 2001 | #387 | 753 | — | |
| 2000 | #423 | 668 | — | |
| 1999 | #421 | 655 | — | |
| 1998 | #438 | 597 | — | |
| 1997 | #426 | 604 | — | |
| 1996 | #443 | 572 | — | |
| 1995 | #504 | 487 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #532 | 462 | #6,968 | 7 |
| 1993 | #517 | 472 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #610 | 372 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #587 | 391 | — | |
| 1990 | #673 | 319 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #698 | 286 | #5,165 | 9 |
| 1988 | #837 | 215 | #3,705 | 13 |
| 1987 | #700 | 261 | — | |
| 1986 | #841 | 198 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #862 | 186 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,004 | 143 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #1,015 | 139 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,019 | 144 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,004 | 145 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,089 | 128 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,104 | 123 | — | |
| 1978 | #969 | 143 | — | |
| 1977 | #926 | 151 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,225 | 92 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,175 | 98 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,133 | 102 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,266 | 82 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,276 | 33 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,613 | 58 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,804 | 49 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,102 | 36 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,205 | 30 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,039 | 33 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,308 | 27 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,684 | 21 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,246 | 29 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,131 | 31 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,357 | 26 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,838 | 39 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,617 | 48 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,985 | 32 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,606 | 44 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,168 | 26 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,598 | 44 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,371 | 53 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,518 | 44 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,581 | 17 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,937 | 13 | — | |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1949
The first year at least five girls were named Yasmin! It came in at #5,244, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1949–1950, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Yasmin is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Connecticut#540 · 1 in 2,301
- Massachusetts#564 · 1 in 2,670
- Maryland#651 · 1 in 2,855
- Virginia#704 · 1 in 3,374
- Minnesota#731 · 1 in 3,580
Best ever in a state: #107 in Delaware, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | #540 | 5 | 1 in 2,301 |
| Massachusetts | #564 | 9 | 1 in 2,670 |
| Maryland | #651 | 7 | 1 in 2,855 |
| Virginia | #704 | 10 | 1 in 3,374 |
| Minnesota | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,580 |
| Ohio | #743 | 12 | 1 in 3,939 |
| Georgia | #748 | 13 | 1 in 3,478 |
| New Jersey | #774 | 9 | 1 in 3,944 |
| California | #788 | 38 | 1 in 4,256 |
| Florida | #864 | 18 | 1 in 4,820 |
| Colorado | #907 | 5 | 1 in 4,665 |
| Arizona | #909 | 6 | 1 in 4,703 |
| Illinois | #927 | 9 | 1 in 4,925 |
| New York | #947 | 16 | 1 in 4,896 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,015 | 8 | 1 in 5,836 |
| Texas | #1,037 | 27 | 1 in 5,946 |
| Washington | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 5,772 |
| Tennessee | #1,127 | 5 | 1 in 6,415 |
| North Carolina | #1,138 | 7 | 1 in 6,640 |
| Michigan | #1,210 | 5 | 1 in 7,146 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Yasmin
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 41 spots since 2024 (#914 → #955)
- 21 spots since 2020 (#976 → #955)
- 25 spots since 2015 (#930 → #955)
- Biggest jump: 299 spots in 1977
- Biggest drop: 137 spots in 1988
Rise & fade · girls
57 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1949
- Peaked 2006 at #324 (1,018 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 40 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 40 yrs · run 1985–2016
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,868
- Highest: 1 in 1,868 girls born in 2006 were named Yasmin (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,975 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 38.7% of all girls named Yasmin (8,426) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #5,244 (1949) | #5,244 |
| 1950s | 298 | #1,371 (1955) | #2,293 |
| 1960s | 320 | #1,617 (1960) | #2,153 |
| 1970s | 931 | #926 (1977) | #1,349 |
| 1980s | 1,845 | #698 (1989) | #907 |
| 1990s | 4,931 | #421 (1999) | #515 |
| 2000s | 8,426 | #324 (2006) | #375 |
| 2010s | 3,311 | #582 (2010) | #855 |
| 2020s | 1,680 | #857 (2023) | #941 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Yasmin ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: