Young
Last seen for girls in 1998 at #14,122 · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
Given to boys 80.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 14 births
- Debut · boys
- 14 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,234since 1880
Young over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | #10,863 | 6 | |
| 2021 | — | #8,825 | 8 | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | #6,345 | 13 | |
| 2017 | — | #10,775 | 6 | |
| 2016 | — | #12,185 | 5 | |
| 2015 | — | #6,676 | 12 | |
| 2014 | — | #8,130 | 9 | |
| 2013 | — | #8,789 | 8 | |
| 2012 | — | #7,559 | 10 | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | #10,766 | 6 | |
| 2009 | — | #8,985 | 8 | |
| 2008 | — | #8,324 | 9 | |
| 2007 | — | #7,094 | 11 | |
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | #6,634 | 11 | |
| 2004 | — | #6,520 | 11 | |
| 2003 | — | #6,258 | 11 | |
| 2002 | — | #5,395 | 13 | |
| 2001 | — | #6,935 | 9 | |
| 2000 | — | #3,640 | 22 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,182 | 25 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #3,390 | 22 |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #2,228 | 38 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #3,021 | 24 |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #2,444 | 31 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #1,977 | 42 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 | #2,509 | 29 |
| 1992 | #6,652 | 13 | #2,128 | 36 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #1,867 | 42 |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | #2,255 | 31 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #2,106 | 33 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #2,305 | 26 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #3,072 | 16 |
| 1986 | #5,459 | 13 | #1,873 | 32 |
| 1985 | #4,860 | 15 | #1,975 | 29 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #1,581 | 38 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #1,864 | 29 |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | #1,622 | 37 |
| 1981 | #4,532 | 16 | #1,548 | 39 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #2,367 | 21 |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 | #1,788 | 31 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #1,760 | 30 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #2,458 | 18 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #1,873 | 26 |
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | #1,658 | 30 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #2,050 | 21 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #1,982 | 21 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #1,928 | 22 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #2,052 | 20 |
| 1970 | — | #2,509 | 14 | |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | #2,046 | 17 |
| 1968 | — | #1,788 | 20 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | — | #2,784 | 9 | |
| 1965 | #4,831 | 8 | #2,366 | 12 |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | #2,546 | 11 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #2,200 | 14 |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #2,364 | 12 |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #2,070 | 16 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #2,210 | 14 |
| 1959 | #3,827 | 11 | #2,530 | 11 |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #2,019 | 16 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | #2,091 | 15 |
| 1955 | #4,740 | 7 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | #1,706 | 20 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #2,287 | 12 |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | #2,073 | 14 |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | #2,367 | 11 |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | #1,746 | 18 |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #1,703 | 19 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #1,786 | 18 |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | #1,759 | 17 |
| 1945 | — | #2,996 | 6 | |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 | #1,683 | 17 |
| 1943 | — | #1,636 | 19 | |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #2,386 | 10 |
| 1941 | — | #2,083 | 12 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,983 | 13 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,159 | 11 | |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | #1,901 | 14 |
| 1937 | — | #2,680 | 8 | |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | #1,463 | 21 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #1,708 | 17 |
| 1934 | — | #1,932 | 14 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,586 | 19 | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #1,995 | 14 |
| 1931 | — | #1,770 | 17 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,533 | 23 | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | #2,096 | 14 |
| 1928 | — | #1,960 | 16 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,603 | 23 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,846 | 18 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,870 | 18 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,727 | 21 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,502 | 25 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,282 | 32 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,588 | 23 | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | #1,694 | 21 |
| 1919 | — | #1,576 | 22 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,446 | 25 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,238 | 30 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,549 | 21 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,782 | 16 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,441 | 18 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,676 | 11 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,223 | 15 | |
| 1911 | — | #982 | 12 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,314 | 7 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,155 | 7 | |
| 1908 | — | #1,217 | 6 | |
| 1907 | — | #999 | 8 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | #1,064 | 6 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #687 | 11 | |
| 1901 | — | #1,058 | 5 | |
| 1900 | — | #968 | 8 | |
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | #885 | 7 | |
| 1897 | — | #725 | 9 | |
| 1896 | — | #982 | 6 | |
| 1895 | — | #795 | 8 | |
| 1894 | — | #1,074 | 5 | |
| 1893 | — | #907 | 6 | |
| 1892 | — | #861 | 7 | |
| 1891 | — | #841 | 6 | |
| 1890 | — | #814 | 7 | |
| 1889 | — | #628 | 10 | |
| 1888 | — | #917 | 6 | |
| 1887 | — | #516 | 12 | |
| 1886 | — | #605 | 10 | |
| 1885 | — | #604 | 10 | |
| 1884 | — | #570 | 11 | |
| 1883 | — | #527 | 12 | |
| 1882 | — | #652 | 9 | |
| 1881 | — | #595 | 9 | |
| 1880 | — | #482 | 14 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Young was already there! It came in at #482, and was given to 14 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1905–1906, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Young is popular in 1911
No state had 5 or more boys named Young in 1911, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Young
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
- Biggest jump: 371 spots in 1902 (#1,058 → #687)
- Biggest drop: 443 spots in 1903 (#687 → #1,130)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #482 (14 births)
- Births halved by 1888, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 1880–1893
- Highest: 1 in 7,892 boys born in 1880 were named Young (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 291,001 boys born in 2022 (0.00%)
- 14.3% of all boys named Young (320) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1967, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 103 | #482 (1880) | #610 |
| 1890s | 66 | #725 (1897) | #894 |
| 1900s | 56 | #687 (1902) | #1,035 |
| 1910s | 177 | #982 (1911) | #1,423 |
| 1920s | 211 | #1,282 (1922) | #1,717 |
| 1930s | 158 | #1,463 (1936) | #1,873 |
| 1940s | 145 | #1,636 (1943) | #2,004 |
| 1950s | 147 | #1,706 (1954) | #2,099 |
| 1960s | 130 | #1,788 (1968) | #2,434 |
| 1970s | 233 | #1,658 (1975) | #2,006 |
| 1980s | 300 | #1,548 (1981) | #2,031 |
| 1990s | 320 | #1,867 (1991) | #2,500 |
| 2000s | 105 | #3,640 (2000) | #6,643 |
| 2010s | 69 | #6,345 (2018) | #8,903 |
| 2020s | 14 | #8,825 (2021) | #9,844 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Young in 1911
Top boys' names in 1911
More about 1911
boys
225,970 boys got a published name in 1911; 1 in 18,831 of them was named Young, which outranked 50.9% of the 1,999 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).