Zariah
#449 for girls in 2025, 689 births · #6,803 for boys in 2025, 12 births
Given to girls 99.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 750 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,164since 1992
Zariah over time
Rank among girls' names. Zariah has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #449 | 689 | #6,803 | 12 |
| 2024 | #436 | 710 | #5,443 | 17 |
| 2023 | #407 | 750 | #7,289 | 11 |
| 2022 | #475 | 669 | #6,479 | 13 |
| 2021 | #528 | 584 | #6,335 | 13 |
| 2020 | #460 | 671 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #482 | 652 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #434 | 728 | — | |
| 2017 | #446 | 709 | #8,140 | 9 |
| 2016 | #448 | 720 | #7,605 | 10 |
| 2015 | #506 | 625 | — | |
| 2014 | #531 | 584 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #521 | 571 | — | |
| 2012 | #475 | 647 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #470 | 630 | — | |
| 2010 | #490 | 617 | #8,139 | 9 |
| 2009 | #499 | 607 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #574 | 536 | — | |
| 2007 | #605 | 497 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #786 | 349 | — | |
| 2005 | #937 | 264 | — | |
| 2004 | #965 | 248 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #1,043 | 219 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,308 | 149 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #1,158 | 180 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,188 | 168 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,539 | 110 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,443 | 118 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,864 | 79 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,714 | 45 | — | |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | — | |
| 1994 | #6,319 | 14 | — | |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | — | |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Zariah! It came in at #8,734, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1992–1993, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Zariah is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nevada#206 · 1 in 753
- South Carolina#229 · 1 in 973
- Georgia#298 · 1 in 1,369
- Ohio#325 · 1 in 1,547
- North Carolina#336 · 1 in 1,528
Best ever in a state: #102 in New Mexico, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #206 | 14 | 1 in 753 |
| South Carolina | #229 | 18 | 1 in 973 |
| Georgia | #298 | 34 | 1 in 1,369 |
| Ohio | #325 | 34 | 1 in 1,547 |
| North Carolina | #336 | 29 | 1 in 1,528 |
| Missouri | #350 | 18 | 1 in 1,501 |
| Mississippi | #367 | 8 | 1 in 1,364 |
| Tennessee | #368 | 18 | 1 in 1,652 |
| Florida | #378 | 44 | 1 in 1,845 |
| New Mexico | #390 | 5 | 1 in 1,349 |
| Oklahoma | #414 | 10 | 1 in 1,665 |
| Illinois | #429 | 28 | 1 in 2,070 |
| Texas | #466 | 69 | 1 in 2,333 |
| Massachusetts | #507 | 10 | 1 in 2,538 |
| Alabama | #528 | 8 | 1 in 2,334 |
| Virginia | #554 | 13 | 1 in 2,791 |
| Louisiana | #558 | 8 | 1 in 2,519 |
| Wisconsin | #579 | 8 | 1 in 2,884 |
| Arizona | #600 | 11 | 1 in 2,793 |
| Kansas | #607 | 5 | 1 in 2,574 |
| Pennsylvania | #617 | 15 | 1 in 3,472 |
| Kentucky | #618 | 6 | 1 in 3,083 |
| Michigan | #655 | 12 | 1 in 3,470 |
| Minnesota | #666 | 7 | 1 in 3,452 |
| Indiana | #671 | 9 | 1 in 3,315 |
| New York | #716 | 24 | 1 in 3,803 |
| Maryland | #744 | 6 | 1 in 3,920 |
| California | #780 | 44 | 1 in 4,663 |
| Colorado | #877 | 5 | 1 in 4,544 |
| New Jersey | #1,150 | 5 | 1 in 7,299 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Zariah
- 13 spots since 2024 (#436 → #449)
- 11 spots since 2020 (#460 → #449)
- 57 spots since 2015 (#506 → #449)
- Biggest jump: 181 spots in 2007 (#786 → #605)
- Biggest drop: 68 spots in 2021 (#460 → #528)
- Debuted 1992
- Peaked 2023 at #407 (750 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 2004–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,139 girls born in 2023 were named Zariah (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,333 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 45.8% of all girls named Zariah (6,483) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 391 | #1,443 (1998) | #5,216 |
| 2000s | 3,217 | #499 (2009) | #906 |
| 2010s | 6,483 | #434 (2018) | #480 |
| 2020s | 4,073 | #407 (2023) | #459 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Zariah in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 3,073 of them was named Zariah, which outranked 97.3% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).