Zayden
#8,860 for girls in 2025, 11 births · #213 for boys in 2025, 1,657 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2016 · 2,140 births
- Debut · boys
- 11 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 32,246since 2000
Zayden over time
Rank among boys' names. Zayden has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #8,860 | 11 | #213 | 1,657 |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | #202 | 1,747 |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #191 | 1,906 |
| 2022 | — | #187 | 2,022 | |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | #204 | 1,891 |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | #185 | 2,104 |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | #194 | 2,028 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #185 | 2,147 |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | #189 | 2,081 |
| 2016 | #7,988 | 14 | #184 | 2,140 |
| 2015 | #6,452 | 19 | #192 | 2,142 |
| 2014 | #8,053 | 14 | #188 | 2,232 |
| 2013 | #9,612 | 11 | #192 | 2,122 |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | #228 | 1,562 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #292 | 1,194 |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #338 | 928 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #398 | 745 |
| 2008 | #9,476 | 12 | #487 | 566 |
| 2007 | — | #588 | 432 | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #880 | 224 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #1,225 | 129 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #1,316 | 112 |
| 2003 | — | #1,717 | 71 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,632 | 36 | |
| 2001 | — | #4,476 | 17 | |
| 2000 | — | #5,920 | 11 | |
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Zayden! It came in at #5,920, and was given to 11 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2000, when fewer than 12 boys a year got the name.
Where Zayden is popular in 2012
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#87 · 1 in 311
- Alabama#95 · 1 in 383
- West Virginia#101 · 1 in 348
- New Mexico#104 · 1 in 388
- Kentucky#138 · 1 in 555
Best ever in a state: #54 in New Mexico, 2018.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #87 | 15 | 1 in 311 |
| Alabama | #95 | 58 | 1 in 383 |
| West Virginia | #101 | 24 | 1 in 348 |
| New Mexico | #104 | 25 | 1 in 388 |
| Kentucky | #138 | 40 | 1 in 555 |
| Arkansas | #146 | 26 | 1 in 549 |
| Mississippi | #146 | 23 | 1 in 585 |
| Indiana | #147 | 59 | 1 in 605 |
| South Carolina | #147 | 33 | 1 in 634 |
| Tennessee | #169 | 49 | 1 in 730 |
| Oklahoma | #170 | 30 | 1 in 675 |
| Idaho | #180 | 14 | 1 in 578 |
| Delaware | #184 | 5 | 1 in 710 |
| Louisiana | #184 | 32 | 1 in 756 |
| Georgia | #185 | 64 | 1 in 844 |
| Rhode Island | #186 | 5 | 1 in 786 |
| Colorado | #190 | 37 | 1 in 734 |
| Ohio | #190 | 67 | 1 in 892 |
| Florida | #194 | 95 | 1 in 968 |
| Texas | #200 | 200 | 1 in 888 |
| North Carolina | #202 | 56 | 1 in 903 |
| Montana | #210 | 6 | 1 in 651 |
| North Dakota | #220 | 5 | 1 in 770 |
| Utah | #220 | 27 | 1 in 802 |
| Pennsylvania | #224 | 51 | 1 in 1,181 |
| Missouri | #226 | 32 | 1 in 992 |
| Arizona | #232 | 40 | 1 in 925 |
| Maryland | #239 | 24 | 1 in 1,156 |
| Kansas | #240 | 18 | 1 in 894 |
| Washington | #254 | 33 | 1 in 1,089 |
| Michigan | #259 | 38 | 1 in 1,254 |
| Oregon | #272 | 16 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Virginia | #285 | 28 | 1 in 1,494 |
| Iowa | #290 | 13 | 1 in 1,163 |
| Nevada | #296 | 10 | 1 in 1,328 |
| Wisconsin | #301 | 18 | 1 in 1,516 |
| Nebraska | #329 | 7 | 1 in 1,413 |
| Illinois | #332 | 37 | 1 in 1,798 |
| Massachusetts | #351 | 13 | 1 in 2,281 |
| New Jersey | #357 | 20 | 1 in 2,074 |
| California | #368 | 100 | 1 in 2,305 |
| Minnesota | #388 | 12 | 1 in 2,308 |
| New York | #445 | 35 | 1 in 2,980 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Zayden
- 11 spots since 2024 (#202 → #213)
- 28 spots since 2020 (#185 → #213)
- 21 spots since 2015 (#192 → #213)
- Biggest jump: 345 spots in 2006 (#1,225 → #880)
- Biggest drop: 19 spots in 2021 (#185 → #204)
- Debuted 2000
- Peaked 2016 at #184 (2,140 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 2006–2025
- Highest: 1 in 820 boys born in 2020 were named Zayden (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,031 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
- Its best rank, #184 in 2016, was only 1 in 887 (0.11%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 57.6% of all boys named Zayden (18,576) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,343 | #398 (2009) | #1,964 |
| 2010s | 18,576 | #184 (2016) | #218 |
| 2020s | 11,327 | #185 (2020) | #197 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Zayden in 2012
Top girls' names in 2012
Top boys' names in 2012
More about 2012
girls
1,761,053 girls got a published name in 2012; 1 in 146,754 of them was named Zayden, which outranked 53.4% of the 19,534 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #8,632Zayley13
- #8,632Zorah13
- #8,632Zuriah13
- #9,109Zayden12
- #9,109Aarianna12
- #9,109Abaigeal12
- #9,109Abeeha12
- #9,711Aaliyana11
- #9,711Aariya11
- #9,711Aashvi11
Tied with 601 names at #9,109; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,896,946 boys got a published name in 2012; 1 in 1,214 of them was named Zayden, which outranked 98.4% of the 14,250 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.