Ziah
#3,577 for girls in 2025, 42 births · #5,399 for boys in 2025, 17 births
Given to girls 73.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2021 · 53 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 917since 1998
Ziah over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,577 | 42 | #5,399 | 17 |
| 2024 | #3,081 | 52 | #5,659 | 16 |
| 2023 | #3,225 | 50 | #4,112 | 26 |
| 2022 | #3,123 | 52 | #4,442 | 23 |
| 2021 | #3,069 | 53 | #4,118 | 25 |
| 2020 | #3,915 | 36 | #5,980 | 14 |
| 2019 | #3,272 | 48 | #3,347 | 34 |
| 2018 | #3,201 | 50 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #3,769 | 40 | #5,788 | 15 |
| 2016 | #4,157 | 35 | #8,816 | 8 |
| 2015 | #3,478 | 45 | #5,999 | 14 |
| 2014 | #4,003 | 37 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #5,834 | 22 | #6,603 | 12 |
| 2012 | #4,216 | 35 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #4,681 | 30 | #5,945 | 14 |
| 2010 | #5,414 | 25 | #5,478 | 16 |
| 2009 | #5,226 | 27 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #3,936 | 40 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #4,213 | 36 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #4,953 | 28 | — | |
| 2005 | #5,266 | 24 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #5,377 | 23 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #6,299 | 18 | — | |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #6,067 | 18 | — | |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #6,191 | 16 | — | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ziah! It came in at #14,122, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1998, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Ziah is popular in 2017
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#2,561 · 1 in 22,839
Best ever in a state: #1,517 in Illinois, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #2,561 | 7 | 1 in 22,839 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ziah
- 496 spots since 2024 (#3,081 → #3,577)
- 338 spots since 2020 (#3,915 → #3,577)
- 99 spots since 2015 (#3,478 → #3,577)
- Debuted 1998
- Peaked 2021 at #3,069 (53 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 30,960 girls born in 2021 were named Ziah (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 38,268 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 40.0% of all girls named Ziah (367) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21 | #6,191 (1999) | #10,157 |
| 2000s | 244 | #3,936 (2008) | #5,519 |
| 2010s | 367 | #3,201 (2018) | #4,203 |
| 2020s | 285 | #3,069 (2021) | #3,332 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ziah in 2017
Top girls' names in 2017
Top boys' names in 2017
More about 2017
girls
1,726,461 girls got a published name in 2017; 1 in 43,162 of them was named Ziah, which outranked 79.6% of the 18,448 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,697Vianna41
- #3,697Yoselyn41
- #3,697Zephyr41
- #3,769Ziah40
- #3,769Acadia40
- #3,769Adaly40
- #3,769Adhira40
- #3,848Aerith39
- #3,848Alaynna39
- #3,848Alesia39
Tied with 78 names at #3,769; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 263Julianne#919 → #1,182
- ↓ 243Milania#947 → #1,190
- ↓ 240Wendy#858 → #1,098
- ↓ 238Montserrat#808 → #1,046
- ↓ 224Nathaly#930 → #1,154
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,850,956 boys got a published name in 2017; 1 in 123,397 of them was named Ziah, which outranked 59.4% of the 14,262 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #5,526Zohaib16
- #5,526Zurich16
- #5,526Zyier16
- #5,788Ziah15
- #5,788Aadarsh15
- #5,788Aadith15
- #5,788Aaryav15
- #6,060Aarion14
- #6,060Abanoub14
- #6,060Abdulkareem14
Tied with 271 names at #5,788; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.