Zoey
- #69 for girls in 2025, 3,427 births
- #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
- Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2012 · 7,482 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 18 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 115,332since 1967
Zoey over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #69 | 3,427 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #59 | 3,613 | — | |
| 2023 | #51 | 4,061 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #45 | 4,516 | — | |
| 2021 | #38 | 5,217 | — | |
| 2020 | #32 | 5,388 | — | |
| 2019 | #31 | 5,686 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #29 | 5,946 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #28 | 6,077 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #26 | 6,481 | — | |
| 2015 | #23 | 6,977 | #5,999 | 14 |
| 2014 | #22 | 7,440 | #7,048 | 11 |
| 2013 | #24 | 7,258 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #20 | 7,482 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #28 | 6,407 | #6,578 | 12 |
| 2010 | #47 | 5,220 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #75 | 3,995 | #9,864 | 7 |
| 2008 | #98 | 3,450 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #112 | 3,044 | #7,094 | 11 |
| 2006 | #119 | 2,858 | #5,072 | 17 |
| 2005 | #152 | 2,275 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #208 | 1,622 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #221 | 1,469 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #268 | 1,182 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #363 | 822 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #410 | 691 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #468 | 563 | — | |
| 1998 | #528 | 478 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #571 | 407 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #654 | 339 | — | |
| 1995 | #874 | 219 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,247 | 138 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #1,250 | 138 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #1,202 | 145 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,584 | 96 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | #3,297 | 33 | — | |
| 1989 | #5,049 | 17 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,840 | 17 | — | |
| 1987 | #5,312 | 14 | — | |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | — | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,905 | 12 | — | |
| 1975 | #6,484 | 8 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1967
The first year at least five girls were named Zoey! It came in at #6,042, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1968–1969, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Zoey is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Michigan#46 · 1 in 288
- North Dakota#49 · 1 in 180
- Nevada#49 · 1 in 249
- Alaska#50 · 1 in 165
- South Dakota#51 · 1 in 203
Best ever in a state: #6 in North Dakota, 2014.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #46 | 124 | 1 in 288 |
| Nevada | #49 | 37 | 1 in 249 |
| North Dakota | #49 | 15 | 1 in 180 |
| Alaska | #50 | 10 | 1 in 165 |
| South Dakota | #51 | 15 | 1 in 203 |
| New Mexico | #52 | 20 | 1 in 234 |
| Montana | #55 | 14 | 1 in 202 |
| New Hampshire | #57 | 18 | 1 in 211 |
| Maryland | #60 | 59 | 1 in 339 |
| Illinois | #61 | 129 | 1 in 344 |
| Georgia | #62 | 119 | 1 in 380 |
| New Jersey | #63 | 107 | 1 in 332 |
| California | #64 | 421 | 1 in 384 |
| Oregon | #65 | 43 | 1 in 304 |
| Minnesota | #66 | 68 | 1 in 316 |
| North Carolina | #66 | 131 | 1 in 355 |
| Pennsylvania | #66 | 137 | 1 in 341 |
| Ohio | #67 | 129 | 1 in 366 |
| Wisconsin | #67 | 64 | 1 in 317 |
| Massachusetts | #72 | 73 | 1 in 329 |
| Florida | #73 | 210 | 1 in 413 |
| Indiana | #73 | 77 | 1 in 362 |
| Kansas | #73 | 37 | 1 in 319 |
| New York | #73 | 183 | 1 in 428 |
| West Virginia | #73 | 18 | 1 in 282 |
| Washington | #75 | 77 | 1 in 375 |
| Rhode Island | #78 | 10 | 1 in 245 |
| Virginia | #78 | 83 | 1 in 407 |
| Connecticut | #79 | 32 | 1 in 359 |
| Mississippi | #80 | 26 | 1 in 342 |
| Colorado | #81 | 60 | 1 in 389 |
| Delaware | #82 | 9 | 1 in 251 |
| Utah | #83 | 50 | 1 in 342 |
| Louisiana | #85 | 42 | 1 in 390 |
| Iowa | #87 | 33 | 1 in 357 |
| Nebraska | #87 | 23 | 1 in 309 |
| Kentucky | #88 | 46 | 1 in 375 |
| Arizona | #89 | 64 | 1 in 441 |
| Tennessee | #94 | 77 | 1 in 417 |
| Texas | #94 | 297 | 1 in 541 |
| South Carolina | #97 | 43 | 1 in 425 |
| Missouri | #100 | 58 | 1 in 419 |
| Idaho | #101 | 20 | 1 in 358 |
| Alabama | #108 | 40 | 1 in 458 |
| District of Columbia | #109 | 7 | 1 in 288 |
| Oklahoma | #121 | 29 | 1 in 510 |
| Arkansas | #131 | 22 | 1 in 482 |
| Hawaii | #136 | 6 | 1 in 358 |
| Maine | #153 | 7 | 1 in 445 |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Zoey
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 37 spots since 2020 (#32 → #69)
- Biggest jump: 373 spots in 1995
- Biggest drop: 10 spots in 2025
Rise & fade · girls
45 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1967
- Peaked 2012 at #20 (7,482 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 18 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 18 yrs · run 2008–2025
- Top 1,000: 31 yrs · run 1995–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 235
- Highest: 1 in 235 girls born in 2012 were named Zoey (0.42%)
- Latest: 1 in 469 girls born in 2025 (0.21%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 56.3% of all girls named Zoey (64,974) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6 | #6,042 (1967) | #6,042 |
| 1970s | 76 | #4,459 (1974) | #6,487 |
| 1980s | 90 | #4,840 (1988) | #5,810 |
| 1990s | 2,556 | #468 (1999) | #1,168 |
| 2000s | 21,408 | #75 (2009) | #203 |
| 2010s | 64,974 | #20 (2012) | #28 |
| 2020s | 26,222 | #32 (2020) | #49 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Zoey ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: