Alicia
#460 for girls in 2025, 672 births · Last seen for boys in 2005 at #11,472
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1984 · 7,820 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 27 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 230,790since 1881
Alicia over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #460 | 672 | — | |
| 2024 | #438 | 708 | — | |
| 2023 | #440 | 703 | — | |
| 2022 | #414 | 760 | — | |
| 2021 | #417 | 754 | — | |
| 2020 | #414 | 753 | — | |
| 2019 | #414 | 756 | — | |
| 2018 | #391 | 794 | — | |
| 2017 | #359 | 873 | — | |
| 2016 | #380 | 866 | — | |
| 2015 | #359 | 915 | — | |
| 2014 | #341 | 978 | — | |
| 2013 | #318 | 1,024 | — | |
| 2012 | #270 | 1,205 | — | |
| 2011 | #260 | 1,231 | — | |
| 2010 | #219 | 1,433 | — | |
| 2009 | #208 | 1,562 | — | |
| 2008 | #177 | 1,866 | — | |
| 2007 | #178 | 1,950 | — | |
| 2006 | #164 | 2,133 | — | |
| 2005 | #148 | 2,345 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #130 | 2,517 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #131 | 2,542 | — | |
| 2002 | #121 | 2,820 | — | |
| 2001 | #130 | 2,658 | — | |
| 2000 | #121 | 2,762 | — | |
| 1999 | #108 | 3,014 | — | |
| 1998 | #98 | 3,408 | — | |
| 1997 | #89 | 3,782 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #91 | 3,861 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #89 | 3,908 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #83 | 4,105 | #5,452 | 10 |
| 1993 | #76 | 4,431 | #4,447 | 13 |
| 1992 | #71 | 4,910 | #4,327 | 13 |
| 1991 | #63 | 5,558 | #3,636 | 16 |
| 1990 | #54 | 6,511 | #2,780 | 23 |
| 1989 | #53 | 6,817 | #1,891 | 39 |
| 1988 | #50 | 6,700 | #2,146 | 29 |
| 1987 | #46 | 6,776 | #1,829 | 35 |
| 1986 | #45 | 7,017 | #1,837 | 33 |
| 1985 | #45 | 7,122 | #2,427 | 21 |
| 1984 | #40 | 7,820 | #1,723 | 33 |
| 1983 | #41 | 7,492 | #1,864 | 29 |
| 1982 | #53 | 5,614 | #2,269 | 22 |
| 1981 | #46 | 5,855 | #2,338 | 21 |
| 1980 | #47 | 5,753 | #2,444 | 20 |
| 1979 | #47 | 5,547 | #2,048 | 25 |
| 1978 | #58 | 4,752 | #2,279 | 20 |
| 1977 | #60 | 4,400 | #3,037 | 13 |
| 1976 | #71 | 3,791 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | #76 | 3,718 | #2,540 | 16 |
| 1974 | #90 | 3,434 | #2,199 | 19 |
| 1973 | #91 | 3,433 | #2,606 | 14 |
| 1972 | #96 | 3,268 | #1,928 | 22 |
| 1971 | #105 | 3,590 | #1,987 | 21 |
| 1970 | #118 | 3,320 | #2,739 | 12 |
| 1969 | #117 | 3,046 | #3,935 | 6 |
| 1968 | #126 | 2,569 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #150 | 2,304 | #2,985 | 8 |
| 1966 | #156 | 2,227 | — | |
| 1965 | #159 | 2,354 | #2,617 | 10 |
| 1964 | #159 | 2,417 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #173 | 2,215 | #3,044 | 8 |
| 1962 | #187 | 1,976 | #3,041 | 8 |
| 1961 | #206 | 1,674 | #3,097 | 8 |
| 1960 | #210 | 1,640 | — | |
| 1959 | #231 | 1,366 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #273 | 1,049 | — | |
| 1957 | #260 | 1,101 | #3,257 | 7 |
| 1956 | #265 | 1,037 | #3,535 | 6 |
| 1955 | #262 | 1,029 | #2,964 | 8 |
| 1954 | #279 | 923 | — | |
| 1953 | #272 | 914 | — | |
| 1952 | #273 | 875 | — | |
| 1951 | #272 | 826 | — | |
| 1950 | #276 | 768 | — | |
| 1949 | #291 | 707 | — | |
| 1948 | #291 | 687 | — | |
| 1947 | #282 | 747 | — | |
| 1946 | #312 | 562 | — | |
| 1945 | #314 | 460 | — | |
| 1944 | #333 | 424 | — | |
| 1943 | #363 | 394 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #373 | 360 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #346 | 358 | #2,656 | 8 |
| 1940 | #373 | 309 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #337 | 354 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #370 | 313 | — | |
| 1937 | #391 | 274 | — | |
| 1936 | #384 | 274 | — | |
| 1935 | #431 | 223 | — | |
| 1934 | #426 | 237 | — | |
| 1933 | #420 | 232 | — | |
| 1932 | #410 | 251 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #380 | 289 | — | |
| 1930 | #370 | 334 | — | |
| 1929 | #388 | 301 | — | |
| 1928 | #389 | 293 | — | |
| 1927 | #389 | 308 | — | |
| 1926 | #415 | 270 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #457 | 228 | — | |
| 1924 | #469 | 219 | — | |
| 1923 | #514 | 185 | — | |
| 1922 | #556 | 164 | — | |
| 1921 | #615 | 141 | — | |
| 1920 | #587 | 149 | — | |
| 1919 | #626 | 125 | — | |
| 1918 | #647 | 118 | — | |
| 1917 | #649 | 110 | — | |
| 1916 | #706 | 95 | — | |
| 1915 | #761 | 75 | — | |
| 1914 | #788 | 54 | — | |
| 1913 | #689 | 57 | — | |
| 1912 | #735 | 46 | — | |
| 1911 | #650 | 44 | — | |
| 1910 | #768 | 31 | — | |
| 1909 | #706 | 32 | — | |
| 1908 | #639 | 36 | — | |
| 1907 | #819 | 21 | — | |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #805 | 20 | — | |
| 1903 | #896 | 15 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,438 | 7 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,007 | 11 | — | |
| 1900 | #885 | 18 | — | |
| 1899 | #835 | 15 | — | |
| 1898 | #821 | 17 | — | |
| 1897 | #867 | 14 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #815 | 15 | — | |
| 1894 | #812 | 14 | — | |
| 1893 | #826 | 13 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,093 | 7 | — | |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | — | |
| 1889 | #839 | 10 | — | |
| 1888 | #837 | 10 | — | |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | — | |
| 1886 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1885 | #793 | 8 | — | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | #692 | 8 | — | |
| 1882 | #740 | 7 | — | |
| 1881 | #679 | 7 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Alicia! It came in at #679, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Alicia is popular in 1972
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#57 · 1 in 298
- Nevada#61 · 1 in 228
- Alabama#68 · 1 in 287
- Louisiana#68 · 1 in 298
- Florida#71 · 1 in 325
Best ever in a state: #22 in Mississippi, 1983.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #57 | 460 | 1 in 298 |
| Nevada | #61 | 12 | 1 in 228 |
| Alabama | #68 | 84 | 1 in 287 |
| Louisiana | #68 | 89 | 1 in 298 |
| Florida | #71 | 137 | 1 in 325 |
| Arizona | #72 | 45 | 1 in 322 |
| Connecticut | #74 | 55 | 1 in 288 |
| Georgia | #74 | 113 | 1 in 318 |
| Texas | #76 | 276 | 1 in 349 |
| Utah | #77 | 33 | 1 in 319 |
| District of Columbia | #79 | 25 | 1 in 296 |
| Kansas | #79 | 38 | 1 in 324 |
| Rhode Island | #81 | 17 | 1 in 305 |
| New Jersey | #87 | 106 | 1 in 384 |
| West Virginia | #90 | 31 | 1 in 393 |
| New Mexico | #91 | 21 | 1 in 364 |
| Colorado | #94 | 42 | 1 in 375 |
| New York | #95 | 257 | 1 in 431 |
| Mississippi | #98 | 45 | 1 in 385 |
| Oklahoma | #98 | 40 | 1 in 408 |
| Idaho | #99 | 13 | 1 in 364 |
| Arkansas | #102 | 30 | 1 in 436 |
| South Carolina | #104 | 46 | 1 in 418 |
| Tennessee | #105 | 61 | 1 in 464 |
| Michigan | #107 | 129 | 1 in 480 |
| North Carolina | #107 | 79 | 1 in 465 |
| Massachusetts | #108 | 71 | 1 in 482 |
| New Hampshire | #109 | 10 | 1 in 445 |
| Illinois | #113 | 154 | 1 in 484 |
| Wyoming | #115 | 5 | 1 in 347 |
| Nebraska | #119 | 19 | 1 in 492 |
| Pennsylvania | #119 | 127 | 1 in 568 |
| Virginia | #121 | 56 | 1 in 529 |
| Ohio | #124 | 134 | 1 in 556 |
| Maine | #125 | 13 | 1 in 503 |
| Minnesota | #126 | 43 | 1 in 560 |
| Washington | #126 | 38 | 1 in 505 |
| Iowa | #127 | 34 | 1 in 513 |
| Maryland | #127 | 36 | 1 in 572 |
| Missouri | #129 | 56 | 1 in 559 |
| Kentucky | #132 | 40 | 1 in 594 |
| Wisconsin | #139 | 40 | 1 in 688 |
| Hawaii | #141 | 10 | 1 in 445 |
| Indiana | #143 | 59 | 1 in 628 |
| South Dakota | #163 | 6 | 1 in 638 |
| Oregon | #189 | 15 | 1 in 842 |
| Montana | #194 | 5 | 1 in 776 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alicia
- 22 spots since 2024 (#438 → #460)
- 46 spots since 2020 (#414 → #460)
- 101 spots since 2015 (#359 → #460)
- Biggest jump: 542 spots in 1903 (#1,438 → #896)
- Biggest drop: 302 spots in 1891 (#791 → #1,093)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1984 at #40 (7,820 births)
- Births halved by 1995, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 27 yrs · run 1972–1998
- Top 1,000: 141 yrs · run 1903–2025
- Highest: 1 in 215 girls born in 1984 were named Alicia (0.46%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,392 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 29.0% of all girls named Alicia (66,966) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 69 | #679 (1881) | #767 |
| 1890s | 130 | #791 (1890) | #872 |
| 1900s | 192 | #639 (1908) | #904 |
| 1910s | 755 | #626 (1919) | #702 |
| 1920s | 2,258 | #388 (1929) | #478 |
| 1930s | 2,781 | #337 (1939) | #392 |
| 1940s | 5,008 | #282 (1947) | #328 |
| 1950s | 9,888 | #231 (1959) | #266 |
| 1960s | 22,422 | #117 (1969) | #164 |
| 1970s | 39,253 | #47 (1979) | #81 |
| 1980s | 66,966 | #40 (1984) | #47 |
| 1990s | 43,488 | #54 (1990) | #82 |
| 2000s | 23,155 | #121 (2002) | #151 |
| 2010s | 10,075 | #219 (2010) | #331 |
| 2020s | 4,350 | #414 (2022) | #431 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Alicia in 1972
Top girls' names in 1972
Top boys' names in 1972
More about 1972
girls
1,521,244 girls got a published name in 1972; 1 in 465 of them was named Alicia, which outranked 99.0% of the 9,666 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,621,608 boys got a published name in 1972; 1 in 73,709 of them was named Alicia, which outranked 66.5% of the 5,751 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 26.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,871Torre23
- #1,871Virgilio23
- #1,871Wyman23
- #1,928Alicia22
- #1,928Allyn22
- #1,928Arlie22
- #1,928Arlin22
- #1,966Ace21
- #1,966Alessandro21
- #1,966Alexandre21
Tied with 37 names at #1,928; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.