Anastacia
#2,895 for girls in 2025, 58 births
- Peak · girls
- 1896 · 12 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,114since 1894
Anastacia over time
Rank among girls' names. Anastacia has never cracked the top 900 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,895 | 58 |
| 2024 | #2,661 | 65 |
| 2023 | #2,588 | 68 |
| 2022 | #2,554 | 69 |
| 2021 | #2,286 | 80 |
| 2020 | #2,468 | 70 |
| 2019 | #2,593 | 67 |
| 2018 | #2,841 | 59 |
| 2017 | #2,779 | 61 |
| 2016 | #2,221 | 86 |
| 2015 | #2,501 | 72 |
| 2014 | #2,615 | 67 |
| 2013 | #2,236 | 83 |
| 2012 | #2,770 | 63 |
| 2011 | #2,763 | 63 |
| 2010 | #2,220 | 87 |
| 2009 | #2,338 | 83 |
| 2008 | #1,880 | 113 |
| 2007 | #1,489 | 155 |
| 2006 | #1,480 | 149 |
| 2005 | #1,494 | 140 |
| 2004 | #1,278 | 167 |
| 2003 | #1,171 | 184 |
| 2002 | #1,370 | 141 |
| 2001 | #1,627 | 112 |
| 2000 | #1,730 | 101 |
| 1999 | #1,738 | 92 |
| 1998 | #1,789 | 87 |
| 1997 | #1,616 | 98 |
| 1996 | #2,058 | 67 |
| 1995 | #1,730 | 84 |
| 1994 | #1,506 | 104 |
| 1993 | #1,554 | 100 |
| 1992 | #1,713 | 87 |
| 1991 | #1,537 | 101 |
| 1990 | #1,479 | 105 |
| 1989 | #1,701 | 80 |
| 1988 | #1,465 | 93 |
| 1987 | #1,234 | 115 |
| 1986 | #1,736 | 67 |
| 1985 | #1,975 | 55 |
| 1984 | #1,633 | 67 |
| 1983 | #1,927 | 53 |
| 1982 | #1,950 | 54 |
| 1981 | #2,563 | 36 |
| 1980 | #2,246 | 44 |
| 1979 | #2,671 | 33 |
| 1978 | #2,237 | 41 |
| 1977 | #2,341 | 38 |
| 1976 | #2,334 | 35 |
| 1975 | #2,612 | 29 |
| 1974 | #2,133 | 38 |
| 1973 | #2,349 | 32 |
| 1972 | #3,276 | 19 |
| 1971 | #2,599 | 28 |
| 1970 | #3,311 | 19 |
| 1969 | #2,645 | 25 |
| 1968 | #2,431 | 26 |
| 1967 | #3,211 | 16 |
| 1966 | #4,493 | 9 |
| 1965 | #3,050 | 17 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 |
| 1963 | #3,066 | 17 |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,688 | 12 |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 |
| 1955 | #3,095 | 14 |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 |
| 1951 | #4,833 | 6 |
| 1950 | #3,052 | 12 |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 |
| 1946 | #4,417 | 6 |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 |
| 1943 | #2,558 | 13 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,689 | 10 |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 |
| 1933 | #2,275 | 13 |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 |
| 1931 | #2,205 | 14 |
| 1930 | #3,055 | 9 |
| 1929 | #2,098 | 16 |
| 1928 | #1,680 | 24 |
| 1927 | #2,339 | 15 |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 |
| 1925 | #1,891 | 21 |
| 1924 | #2,661 | 13 |
| 1923 | #2,587 | 13 |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 |
| 1921 | #1,765 | 24 |
| 1920 | #2,263 | 16 |
| 1919 | #1,745 | 22 |
| 1918 | #2,519 | 13 |
| 1917 | #2,204 | 15 |
| 1916 | #2,658 | 11 |
| 1915 | #1,800 | 18 |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 |
| 1913 | #1,670 | 13 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 |
| 1910 | #2,140 | 6 |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,561 | 7 |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,379 | 7 |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Anastacia! It came in at #1,485, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1894–1895, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Anastacia is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Ohio#887 · 1 in 7,750
- Arizona#1,002 · 1 in 6,389
- Texas#1,312 · 1 in 10,941
- California#1,597 · 1 in 15,988
- Florida#1,686 · 1 in 15,461
Best ever in a state: #302 in New Mexico, 2010.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | #887 | 8 | 1 in 7,750 |
| Arizona | #1,002 | 5 | 1 in 6,389 |
| Texas | #1,312 | 14 | 1 in 10,941 |
| California | #1,597 | 14 | 1 in 15,988 |
| Florida | #1,686 | 5 | 1 in 15,461 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Anastacia
- 234 spots since 2024 (#2,661 → #2,895)
- 427 spots since 2020 (#2,468 → #2,895)
- 394 spots since 2015 (#2,501 → #2,895)
- Debuted 1894
- Peaked 1896 at #950 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1897, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1896
- Highest: 1 in 9,930 girls born in 2003 were named Anastacia (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 27,711 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #950 in 1896, was only 1 in 19,827 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 26.3% of all girls named Anastacia (1,345) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 24 | #950 (1896) | #1,271 |
| 1900s | 12 | #1,561 (1900) | #1,811 |
| 1910s | 118 | #1,670 (1913) | #2,222 |
| 1920s | 180 | #1,680 (1928) | #2,149 |
| 1930s | 98 | #2,037 (1932) | #2,691 |
| 1940s | 75 | #2,558 (1943) | #3,542 |
| 1950s | 93 | #3,052 (1950) | #4,066 |
| 1960s | 150 | #2,431 (1968) | #3,284 |
| 1970s | 312 | #2,133 (1974) | #2,586 |
| 1980s | 664 | #1,234 (1987) | #1,843 |
| 1990s | 925 | #1,479 (1990) | #1,672 |
| 2000s | 1,345 | #1,171 (2003) | #1,586 |
| 2010s | 708 | #2,220 (2010) | #2,554 |
| 2020s | 410 | #2,286 (2021) | #2,575 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Anastacia in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 17,981 of them was named Anastacia, which outranked 90.2% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,719Saira102
- #1,719Tanner102
- #1,719Yesica102
- #1,730Anastacia101
- #1,730Briza101
- #1,730Jacinda101
- #1,730Jaliyah101
- #1,744Dasha100
- #1,744Emmaline100
- #1,744Izabel100
Tied with 13 names at #1,730; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.