Andres
Last seen for girls in 2022 at #15,306 · #200 for boys in 2025, 1,744 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2007 · 2,721 births
- Debut · boys
- 14 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 96,284since 1880
Andres over time
Rank among boys' names. Andres has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #200 | 1,744 | |
| 2024 | — | #197 | 1,813 | |
| 2023 | — | #201 | 1,833 | |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | #205 | 1,831 |
| 2021 | — | #217 | 1,752 | |
| 2020 | — | #219 | 1,706 | |
| 2019 | — | #220 | 1,710 | |
| 2018 | — | #215 | 1,741 | |
| 2017 | — | #219 | 1,755 | |
| 2016 | — | #218 | 1,787 | |
| 2015 | — | #228 | 1,678 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #221 | 1,711 |
| 2013 | — | #212 | 1,798 | |
| 2012 | — | #193 | 1,947 | |
| 2011 | — | #178 | 2,160 | |
| 2010 | — | #181 | 2,089 | |
| 2009 | — | #173 | 2,256 | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #158 | 2,508 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #152 | 2,721 |
| 2006 | — | #161 | 2,600 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #160 | 2,574 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 | #170 | 2,395 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #171 | 2,327 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #157 | 2,440 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #153 | 2,601 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #164 | 2,355 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #154 | 2,370 |
| 1998 | #6,360 | 15 | #157 | 2,179 |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #157 | 2,202 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #160 | 2,170 |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | #171 | 1,914 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #163 | 1,966 |
| 1993 | #4,393 | 23 | #152 | 2,103 |
| 1992 | #4,849 | 20 | #186 | 1,710 |
| 1991 | #4,329 | 23 | #201 | 1,523 |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | #201 | 1,503 |
| 1989 | #4,670 | 19 | #214 | 1,307 |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #215 | 1,226 |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | #218 | 1,102 |
| 1986 | #4,186 | 19 | #225 | 1,058 |
| 1985 | #5,348 | 13 | #226 | 1,038 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #240 | 921 |
| 1983 | #4,476 | 16 | #240 | 939 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #250 | 889 |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 | #264 | 820 |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #284 | 737 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #308 | 633 |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | #308 | 582 |
| 1977 | #4,942 | 13 | #316 | 589 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #346 | 488 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #345 | 496 |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | #335 | 519 |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | #382 | 405 |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | #409 | 370 |
| 1971 | — | #404 | 398 | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | #436 | 349 |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #431 | 337 |
| 1968 | — | #443 | 298 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #438 | 296 |
| 1966 | — | #456 | 277 | |
| 1965 | — | #488 | 250 | |
| 1964 | — | #488 | 262 | |
| 1963 | — | #529 | 225 | |
| 1962 | — | #524 | 230 | |
| 1961 | — | #555 | 199 | |
| 1960 | — | #543 | 214 | |
| 1959 | — | #548 | 203 | |
| 1958 | — | #595 | 169 | |
| 1957 | — | #571 | 183 | |
| 1956 | — | #615 | 152 | |
| 1955 | — | #594 | 153 | |
| 1954 | — | #624 | 140 | |
| 1953 | — | #528 | 181 | |
| 1952 | — | #574 | 149 | |
| 1951 | — | #601 | 134 | |
| 1950 | — | #549 | 151 | |
| 1949 | — | #585 | 133 | |
| 1948 | — | #563 | 140 | |
| 1947 | — | #604 | 126 | |
| 1946 | — | #614 | 110 | |
| 1945 | — | #583 | 107 | |
| 1944 | — | #601 | 104 | |
| 1943 | — | #604 | 109 | |
| 1942 | — | #615 | 105 | |
| 1941 | — | #628 | 93 | |
| 1940 | — | #670 | 82 | |
| 1939 | — | #685 | 75 | |
| 1938 | — | #672 | 80 | |
| 1937 | — | #675 | 78 | |
| 1936 | — | #622 | 88 | |
| 1935 | — | #629 | 87 | |
| 1934 | — | #615 | 93 | |
| 1933 | — | #566 | 103 | |
| 1932 | — | #651 | 87 | |
| 1931 | — | #664 | 81 | |
| 1930 | — | #537 | 123 | |
| 1929 | — | #605 | 100 | |
| 1928 | — | #554 | 121 | |
| 1927 | — | #610 | 104 | |
| 1926 | — | #712 | 80 | |
| 1925 | #4,426 | 6 | #670 | 90 |
| 1924 | — | #626 | 104 | |
| 1923 | — | #609 | 109 | |
| 1922 | — | #633 | 104 | |
| 1921 | — | #677 | 91 | |
| 1920 | — | #630 | 99 | |
| 1919 | — | #774 | 70 | |
| 1918 | — | #733 | 76 | |
| 1917 | — | #839 | 58 | |
| 1916 | — | #824 | 57 | |
| 1915 | — | #816 | 56 | |
| 1914 | — | #819 | 42 | |
| 1913 | — | #667 | 45 | |
| 1912 | — | #755 | 33 | |
| 1911 | — | #624 | 24 | |
| 1910 | — | #634 | 21 | |
| 1909 | — | #615 | 19 | |
| 1908 | — | #585 | 19 | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #640 | 14 | |
| 1905 | — | #615 | 15 | |
| 1904 | — | #587 | 15 | |
| 1903 | — | #734 | 10 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | #559 | 13 | |
| 1900 | — | #1,310 | 5 | |
| 1899 | — | #928 | 6 | |
| 1898 | — | #701 | 10 | |
| 1897 | — | #787 | 8 | |
| 1896 | — | #1,101 | 5 | |
| 1895 | — | #795 | 8 | |
| 1894 | — | #730 | 9 | |
| 1893 | — | #768 | 8 | |
| 1892 | — | #956 | 6 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | #739 | 8 | |
| 1889 | — | #722 | 8 | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | #679 | 8 | |
| 1886 | — | #605 | 10 | |
| 1885 | — | #700 | 8 | |
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | #644 | 9 | |
| 1882 | — | #691 | 8 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | #482 | 14 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Andres was already there! It came in at #482, and was given to 14 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1888, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Andres is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#59 · 1 in 204
- California#72 · 1 in 294
- Arizona#95 · 1 in 367
- Texas#98 · 1 in 392
- Florida#100 · 1 in 471
Best ever in a state: #32 in New Mexico, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #59 | 52 | 1 in 204 |
| California | #72 | 834 | 1 in 294 |
| Arizona | #95 | 106 | 1 in 367 |
| Texas | #98 | 445 | 1 in 392 |
| Florida | #100 | 191 | 1 in 471 |
| Nevada | #112 | 30 | 1 in 426 |
| Illinois | #139 | 125 | 1 in 627 |
| Colorado | #151 | 53 | 1 in 566 |
| Oregon | #160 | 31 | 1 in 623 |
| New Jersey | #161 | 49 | 1 in 975 |
| Rhode Island | #174 | 5 | 1 in 1,037 |
| Connecticut | #176 | 16 | 1 in 1,106 |
| Kansas | #217 | 17 | 1 in 966 |
| New York | #218 | 84 | 1 in 1,312 |
| North Carolina | #218 | 42 | 1 in 1,197 |
| Idaho | #221 | 9 | 1 in 898 |
| Nebraska | #221 | 10 | 1 in 1,025 |
| Oklahoma | #226 | 18 | 1 in 1,145 |
| Iowa | #228 | 14 | 1 in 1,162 |
| Utah | #260 | 16 | 1 in 1,342 |
| Georgia | #263 | 40 | 1 in 1,395 |
| Washington | #269 | 24 | 1 in 1,397 |
| Minnesota | #270 | 17 | 1 in 1,724 |
| Wisconsin | #280 | 16 | 1 in 1,801 |
| Indiana | #285 | 22 | 1 in 1,695 |
| Virginia | #286 | 22 | 1 in 1,840 |
| Arkansas | #297 | 9 | 1 in 1,627 |
| Massachusetts | #315 | 14 | 1 in 2,537 |
| Kentucky | #335 | 9 | 1 in 2,572 |
| Pennsylvania | #367 | 21 | 1 in 3,020 |
| Missouri | #372 | 12 | 1 in 2,776 |
| Tennessee | #382 | 13 | 1 in 2,689 |
| Maryland | #387 | 11 | 1 in 2,572 |
| Michigan | #401 | 19 | 1 in 2,955 |
| Ohio | #455 | 16 | 1 in 4,188 |
| Alabama | #521 | 6 | 1 in 3,863 |
| South Carolina | #567 | 5 | 1 in 4,017 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Andres
- 3 spots since 2024 (#197 → #200)
- 19 spots since 2020 (#219 → #200)
- 28 spots since 2015 (#228 → #200)
- Biggest jump: 751 spots in 1901 (#1,310 → #559)
- Biggest drop: 382 spots in 1900 (#928 → #1,310)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2007 at #152 (2,721 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 140 yrs · run 1908–2025
- Highest: 1 in 747 boys born in 2001 were named Andres (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 979 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
- Its best rank, #152 in 2007, was only 1 in 763 (0.13%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.7% of all boys named Andres (24,777) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 77 | #482 (1880) | #684 |
| 1890s | 68 | #701 (1898) | #834 |
| 1900s | 110 | #559 (1901) | #706 |
| 1910s | 482 | #624 (1911) | #749 |
| 1920s | 1,002 | #554 (1928) | #633 |
| 1930s | 895 | #537 (1930) | #632 |
| 1940s | 1,109 | #563 (1948) | #607 |
| 1950s | 1,615 | #528 (1953) | #580 |
| 1960s | 2,588 | #431 (1969) | #490 |
| 1970s | 4,829 | #308 (1979) | #359 |
| 1980s | 10,037 | #214 (1989) | #238 |
| 1990s | 19,640 | #152 (1993) | #170 |
| 2000s | 24,777 | #152 (2007) | #162 |
| 2010s | 18,376 | #178 (2011) | #209 |
| 2020s | 10,679 | #197 (2024) | #207 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Andres in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
Top boys' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 256,697 of them was named Andres, which outranked 32.6% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #11,108Zoelle8
- #11,108Zyla8
- #11,108Zyriah8
- #12,187Andres7
- #12,187Aaliayh7
- #12,187Aamina7
- #12,187Aana7
- #13,595Aaishah6
- #13,595Aalana6
- #13,595Aalaysia6
Tied with 1,407 names at #12,187; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,941,514 boys got a published name in 2002; 1 in 796 of them was named Andres, which outranked 98.7% of the 12,489 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 12.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.