Angelo
Last seen for girls in 2011 at #14,824 · #304 for boys in 2025, 1,124 births
Given to boys 99.0% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1916 · 864 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 86,106since 1881
Angelo over time
Rank among boys' names. Angelo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #304 | 1,124 | |
| 2024 | — | #286 | 1,173 | |
| 2023 | — | #299 | 1,117 | |
| 2022 | — | #314 | 1,068 | |
| 2021 | — | #316 | 1,047 | |
| 2020 | — | #314 | 1,055 | |
| 2019 | — | #317 | 1,059 | |
| 2018 | — | #330 | 1,013 | |
| 2017 | — | #333 | 1,030 | |
| 2016 | — | #329 | 1,049 | |
| 2015 | — | #299 | 1,207 | |
| 2014 | — | #316 | 1,105 | |
| 2013 | — | #308 | 1,121 | |
| 2012 | — | #311 | 1,066 | |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #298 | 1,121 |
| 2010 | — | #290 | 1,157 | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #286 | 1,149 |
| 2008 | — | #283 | 1,201 | |
| 2007 | — | #259 | 1,338 | |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | #260 | 1,314 |
| 2005 | — | #257 | 1,294 | |
| 2004 | — | #269 | 1,218 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #270 | 1,159 |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #278 | 1,085 |
| 2001 | — | #286 | 1,046 | |
| 2000 | — | #303 | 991 | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #306 | 938 |
| 1998 | — | #303 | 944 | |
| 1997 | — | #307 | 886 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #333 | 776 |
| 1995 | — | #343 | 714 | |
| 1994 | — | #346 | 712 | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #338 | 745 |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #334 | 761 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #327 | 772 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #334 | 739 |
| 1989 | #5,836 | 14 | #329 | 706 |
| 1988 | #5,598 | 14 | #333 | 648 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #329 | 627 |
| 1986 | #4,028 | 20 | #340 | 563 |
| 1985 | #4,282 | 18 | #318 | 640 |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | #329 | 572 |
| 1983 | #4,476 | 16 | #316 | 617 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #318 | 608 |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | #328 | 583 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #318 | 601 |
| 1979 | #5,092 | 13 | #334 | 548 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #327 | 535 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #324 | 576 |
| 1976 | #2,932 | 25 | #318 | 555 |
| 1975 | #3,259 | 21 | #324 | 548 |
| 1974 | #2,835 | 25 | #323 | 550 |
| 1973 | #3,122 | 21 | #334 | 512 |
| 1972 | #2,680 | 26 | #331 | 539 |
| 1971 | #2,665 | 27 | #347 | 530 |
| 1970 | #2,705 | 26 | #325 | 594 |
| 1969 | #2,585 | 26 | #335 | 542 |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | #336 | 520 |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 | #287 | 639 |
| 1966 | #2,839 | 19 | #302 | 605 |
| 1965 | #2,464 | 24 | #291 | 661 |
| 1964 | #2,825 | 20 | #301 | 694 |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | #275 | 784 |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | #285 | 715 |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 | #282 | 754 |
| 1960 | #3,095 | 16 | #300 | 663 |
| 1959 | #2,980 | 16 | #295 | 709 |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | #301 | 628 |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | #281 | 723 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | #289 | 650 |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | #301 | 579 |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | #303 | 568 |
| 1953 | — | #319 | 487 | |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #318 | 500 |
| 1951 | — | #324 | 446 | |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 | #325 | 437 |
| 1949 | — | #340 | 392 | |
| 1948 | — | #325 | 427 | |
| 1947 | — | #324 | 445 | |
| 1946 | — | #343 | 355 | |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 | #351 | 287 |
| 1944 | — | #332 | 333 | |
| 1943 | — | #319 | 366 | |
| 1942 | — | #290 | 435 | |
| 1941 | — | #291 | 395 | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #281 | 395 |
| 1939 | — | #278 | 394 | |
| 1938 | — | #284 | 375 | |
| 1937 | — | #266 | 414 | |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #268 | 406 |
| 1935 | #3,742 | 6 | #238 | 492 |
| 1934 | — | #233 | 494 | |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #220 | 521 |
| 1932 | #3,047 | 9 | #209 | 607 |
| 1931 | — | #194 | 671 | |
| 1930 | #3,345 | 8 | #190 | 727 |
| 1929 | #3,394 | 8 | #176 | 796 |
| 1928 | #2,497 | 13 | #177 | 811 |
| 1927 | #3,284 | 9 | #168 | 893 |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #172 | 840 |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #168 | 897 |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | #165 | 959 |
| 1923 | #3,641 | 8 | #157 | 990 |
| 1922 | #3,152 | 10 | #161 | 978 |
| 1921 | #3,666 | 8 | #148 | 1,044 |
| 1920 | — | #155 | 922 | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | #161 | 843 |
| 1918 | #2,674 | 12 | #162 | 864 |
| 1917 | #3,713 | 7 | #152 | 856 |
| 1916 | — | #146 | 864 | |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 | #149 | 799 |
| 1914 | — | #146 | 643 | |
| 1913 | — | #153 | 478 | |
| 1912 | — | #155 | 384 | |
| 1911 | — | #174 | 181 | |
| 1910 | — | #195 | 135 | |
| 1909 | — | #217 | 98 | |
| 1908 | — | #230 | 82 | |
| 1907 | — | #273 | 58 | |
| 1906 | — | #263 | 56 | |
| 1905 | — | #284 | 48 | |
| 1904 | — | #306 | 41 | |
| 1903 | — | #303 | 38 | |
| 1902 | — | #326 | 36 | |
| 1901 | — | #310 | 33 | |
| 1900 | — | #430 | 27 | |
| 1899 | — | #424 | 19 | |
| 1898 | — | #435 | 21 | |
| 1897 | — | #411 | 21 | |
| 1896 | — | #592 | 13 | |
| 1895 | — | #579 | 13 | |
| 1894 | — | #439 | 19 | |
| 1893 | — | #459 | 16 | |
| 1892 | — | #572 | 13 | |
| 1891 | — | #635 | 9 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #525 | 13 | |
| 1888 | — | #704 | 9 | |
| 1887 | — | #679 | 8 | |
| 1886 | — | #512 | 13 | |
| 1885 | — | #641 | 9 | |
| 1884 | — | #613 | 10 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #691 | 8 | |
| 1881 | — | #866 | 5 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Angelo! It came in at #866, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Angelo is popular in 2006
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#96 · 1 in 355
- Colorado#142 · 1 in 531
- New York#153 · 1 in 811
- Nevada#164 · 1 in 651
- Hawaii#168 · 1 in 638
Best ever in a state: #33 in Rhode Island, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #96 | 32 | 1 in 355 |
| Colorado | #142 | 57 | 1 in 531 |
| New York | #153 | 135 | 1 in 811 |
| Nevada | #164 | 24 | 1 in 651 |
| Hawaii | #168 | 8 | 1 in 638 |
| New Jersey | #173 | 48 | 1 in 980 |
| Illinois | #174 | 90 | 1 in 855 |
| Florida | #195 | 105 | 1 in 984 |
| New Hampshire | #197 | 6 | 1 in 910 |
| Connecticut | #200 | 15 | 1 in 1,122 |
| California | #207 | 267 | 1 in 975 |
| Pennsylvania | #218 | 52 | 1 in 1,240 |
| Maryland | #224 | 24 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Arizona | #231 | 43 | 1 in 1,054 |
| Montana | #235 | 5 | 1 in 869 |
| Ohio | #247 | 46 | 1 in 1,444 |
| Massachusetts | #279 | 17 | 1 in 1,936 |
| Minnesota | #284 | 19 | 1 in 1,619 |
| Michigan | #296 | 30 | 1 in 1,807 |
| Washington | #303 | 24 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Virginia | #319 | 23 | 1 in 1,911 |
| Wisconsin | #338 | 14 | 1 in 2,136 |
| Missouri | #343 | 16 | 1 in 2,186 |
| Indiana | #375 | 16 | 1 in 2,424 |
| Oklahoma | #381 | 11 | 1 in 1,958 |
| Louisiana | #392 | 12 | 1 in 2,092 |
| North Carolina | #400 | 21 | 1 in 2,595 |
| Texas | #414 | 69 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Iowa | #433 | 6 | 1 in 2,823 |
| Kansas | #458 | 6 | 1 in 2,804 |
| Arkansas | #499 | 5 | 1 in 3,124 |
| Utah | #509 | 7 | 1 in 3,327 |
| Kentucky | #546 | 5 | 1 in 4,797 |
| Georgia | #568 | 16 | 1 in 3,902 |
| Oregon | #576 | 5 | 1 in 4,071 |
| Tennessee | #607 | 8 | 1 in 4,682 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Angelo
- 18 spots since 2024 (#286 → #304)
- 10 spots since 2020 (#314 → #304)
- 5 spots since 2015 (#299 → #304)
- Biggest jump: 181 spots in 1897 (#592 → #411)
- Biggest drop: 167 spots in 1887 (#512 → #679)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1916 at #146 (864 births)
- Births halved by 1936, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 144 yrs · run 1884–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,018 boys born in 1914 were named Angelo (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,520 boys born in 2025 (0.07%)
- Its best rank, #146 in 1916, was only 1 in 1,030 (0.10%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 13.7% of all boys named Angelo (11,795) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 75 | #512 (1886) | #654 |
| 1890s | 156 | #411 (1897) | #511 |
| 1900s | 517 | #217 (1909) | #294 |
| 1910s | 6,047 | #146 (1916) | #159 |
| 1920s | 9,130 | #148 (1921) | #165 |
| 1930s | 5,101 | #190 (1930) | #238 |
| 1940s | 3,830 | #281 (1940) | #320 |
| 1950s | 5,727 | #281 (1957) | #306 |
| 1960s | 6,577 | #275 (1963) | #299 |
| 1970s | 5,487 | #318 (1976) | #329 |
| 1980s | 6,165 | #316 (1983) | #326 |
| 1990s | 7,987 | #303 (1998) | #327 |
| 2000s | 11,795 | #257 (2005) | #275 |
| 2010s | 10,928 | #290 (2010) | #313 |
| 2020s | 6,584 | #286 (2024) | #306 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Angelo in 2006
Top girls' names in 2006
Top boys' names in 2006
More about 2006
girls
1,901,209 girls got a published name in 2006; 1 in 211,245 of them was named Angelo, which outranked 43.1% of the 20,064 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #10,611Zuleica10
- #10,611Zuriel10
- #10,611Zyann10
- #11,417Angelo9
- #11,417Aalaysia9
- #11,417Aaliyana9
- #11,417Aaminah9
- #12,420Aajah8
- #12,420Aajaylah8
- #12,420Aaleah8
Tied with 1,002 names at #11,417; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 8,571Bethzy#9,452 → #881
- ↑ 1,747Rihanna#2,278 → #531
- ↑ 965Yaretzi#1,803 → #838
- ↑ 921Betsy#1,668 → #747
- ↑ 612Evangeline#1,210 → #598
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,055,273 boys got a published name in 2006; 1 in 1,564 of them was named Angelo, which outranked 98.1% of the 14,047 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.