Annabell
#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births
- Peak · girls
- 1906 · 33 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 6,725since 1882
Annabell over time
Rank among girls' names. Annabell has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 |
| 2024 | #6,642 | 17 |
| 2023 | #6,409 | 18 |
| 2022 | #4,671 | 29 |
| 2021 | #4,090 | 35 |
| 2020 | #4,263 | 32 |
| 2019 | #3,851 | 38 |
| 2018 | #2,782 | 61 |
| 2017 | #2,035 | 96 |
| 2016 | #1,785 | 116 |
| 2015 | #1,425 | 162 |
| 2014 | #923 | 291 |
| 2013 | #947 | 267 |
| 2012 | #978 | 257 |
| 2011 | #965 | 265 |
| 2010 | #1,054 | 235 |
| 2009 | #1,249 | 197 |
| 2008 | #1,395 | 170 |
| 2007 | #1,635 | 136 |
| 2006 | #1,771 | 117 |
| 2005 | #1,767 | 111 |
| 2004 | #2,204 | 80 |
| 2003 | #2,282 | 74 |
| 2002 | #2,310 | 70 |
| 2001 | #2,700 | 55 |
| 2000 | #2,974 | 47 |
| 1999 | #3,970 | 29 |
| 1998 | #3,497 | 34 |
| 1997 | #4,370 | 24 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 |
| 1995 | #4,846 | 20 |
| 1994 | #5,984 | 15 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 |
| 1992 | #5,051 | 19 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 |
| 1990 | #5,835 | 15 |
| 1989 | #5,836 | 14 |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 |
| 1985 | #3,852 | 21 |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 |
| 1983 | #3,806 | 20 |
| 1982 | #4,716 | 15 |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 |
| 1980 | #4,327 | 17 |
| 1979 | #4,626 | 15 |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 |
| 1977 | #4,235 | 16 |
| 1976 | #4,614 | 13 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 |
| 1973 | #3,635 | 17 |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 |
| 1971 | #3,266 | 20 |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 |
| 1967 | #3,340 | 15 |
| 1966 | #2,937 | 18 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 |
| 1964 | #3,000 | 18 |
| 1963 | #3,336 | 15 |
| 1962 | #2,814 | 19 |
| 1961 | #2,752 | 20 |
| 1960 | #2,246 | 27 |
| 1959 | #2,395 | 23 |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 |
| 1955 | #3,095 | 14 |
| 1954 | #2,378 | 21 |
| 1953 | #3,106 | 13 |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 |
| 1951 | #2,116 | 22 |
| 1950 | #2,185 | 20 |
| 1949 | #2,212 | 20 |
| 1948 | #2,416 | 17 |
| 1947 | #1,822 | 28 |
| 1946 | #1,771 | 26 |
| 1945 | #1,743 | 23 |
| 1944 | #1,455 | 31 |
| 1943 | #1,367 | 36 |
| 1942 | #1,630 | 26 |
| 1941 | #1,472 | 28 |
| 1940 | #1,347 | 31 |
| 1939 | #1,179 | 38 |
| 1938 | #1,007 | 50 |
| 1937 | #1,303 | 31 |
| 1936 | #1,003 | 47 |
| 1935 | #912 | 57 |
| 1934 | #894 | 58 |
| 1933 | #851 | 62 |
| 1932 | #790 | 74 |
| 1931 | #708 | 89 |
| 1930 | #859 | 69 |
| 1929 | #661 | 111 |
| 1928 | #695 | 101 |
| 1927 | #693 | 110 |
| 1926 | #783 | 85 |
| 1925 | #707 | 109 |
| 1924 | #682 | 118 |
| 1923 | #678 | 120 |
| 1922 | #685 | 114 |
| 1921 | #684 | 117 |
| 1920 | #739 | 95 |
| 1919 | #758 | 86 |
| 1918 | #791 | 81 |
| 1917 | #775 | 79 |
| 1916 | #810 | 70 |
| 1915 | #767 | 74 |
| 1914 | #736 | 61 |
| 1913 | #782 | 45 |
| 1912 | #697 | 52 |
| 1911 | #825 | 27 |
| 1910 | #698 | 37 |
| 1909 | #845 | 23 |
| 1908 | #829 | 22 |
| 1907 | #760 | 24 |
| 1906 | #622 | 33 |
| 1905 | #713 | 25 |
| 1904 | #837 | 19 |
| 1903 | #680 | 24 |
| 1902 | #849 | 17 |
| 1901 | #857 | 15 |
| 1900 | #917 | 17 |
| 1899 | #935 | 12 |
| 1898 | #840 | 16 |
| 1897 | #826 | 15 |
| 1896 | #999 | 11 |
| 1895 | #788 | 16 |
| 1894 | #950 | 11 |
| 1893 | #713 | 17 |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 |
| 1891 | #1,006 | 8 |
| 1890 | #1,099 | 7 |
| 1889 | #839 | 10 |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 |
| 1886 | #731 | 10 |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 |
| 1884 | #930 | 6 |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | #813 | 6 |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Annabell! It came in at #813, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Annabell is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Florida#1,126 · 1 in 8,558
- Texas#2,205 · 1 in 22,278
- California#2,391 · 1 in 27,841
Best ever in a state: #201 in Oregon, 1924.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | #1,126 | 9 | 1 in 8,558 |
| Texas | #2,205 | 7 | 1 in 22,278 |
| California | #2,391 | 8 | 1 in 27,841 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Annabell
- 920 spots since 2024 (#6,642 → #5,722)
- 1,459 spots since 2020 (#4,263 → #5,722)
- 4,297 spots since 2015 (#1,425 → #5,722)
- Biggest jump: 737 spots in 1893 (#1,450 → #713)
- Biggest drop: 502 spots in 2015 (#923 → #1,425)
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1906 at #622 (33 births)
- Births halved by 1953, 47 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1893–1935
- Highest: 1 in 6,139 girls born in 2014 were named Annabell (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #622 in 1906, was only 1 in 8,948 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 26.6% of all girls named Annabell (1,788) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 50 | #731 (1886) | #808 |
| 1890s | 118 | #713 (1893) | #961 |
| 1900s | 219 | #622 (1906) | #791 |
| 1910s | 612 | #697 (1912) | #764 |
| 1920s | 1,080 | #661 (1929) | #701 |
| 1930s | 575 | #708 (1931) | #951 |
| 1940s | 266 | #1,347 (1940) | #1,724 |
| 1950s | 164 | #2,116 (1951) | #2,950 |
| 1960s | 163 | #2,246 (1960) | #3,419 |
| 1970s | 138 | #3,266 (1971) | #4,639 |
| 1980s | 152 | #3,806 (1983) | #5,147 |
| 1990s | 191 | #3,497 (1998) | #5,563 |
| 2000s | 1,057 | #1,249 (2009) | #2,029 |
| 2010s | 1,788 | #923 (2014) | #1,675 |
| 2020s | 152 | #4,090 (2021) | #5,300 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Annabell in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 25,670 of them was named Annabell, which outranked 87.2% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,288Talya71
- #2,288Yenifer71
- #2,288Yulianna71
- #2,310Annabell70
- #2,310Alasia70
- #2,310Alaura70
- #2,310Anusha70
- #2,331Abrielle69
- #2,331Ariyanna69
- #2,331Aubri69
Tied with 20 names at #2,310; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.