Arleth
#269 for girls in 2025, 1,156 births · #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,156 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 6,840since 1991
Arleth over time
Rank among girls' names. Arleth has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #269 | 1,156 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #428 | 719 | — | |
| 2023 | #559 | 536 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #638 | 462 | — | |
| 2021 | #962 | 270 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,224 | 187 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,117 | 218 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,071 | 237 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,131 | 219 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,034 | 256 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,793 | 116 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,940 | 103 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,002 | 97 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,918 | 103 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,619 | 133 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,546 | 144 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,198 | 209 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,774 | 124 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,489 | 155 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,097 | 229 | — | |
| 2005 | #820 | 314 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,314 | 162 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,422 | 139 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,252 | 158 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,600 | 115 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,689 | 104 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,307 | 64 | — | |
| 1998 | #4,366 | 25 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,695 | 46 | — | |
| 1996 | #5,280 | 18 | — | |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | — | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | — | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Arleth! It came in at #11,509, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1992–1993, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Arleth is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#611 · 1 in 3,389
- Arizona#624 · 1 in 3,129
- California#809 · 1 in 5,322
- Illinois#994 · 1 in 6,849
- North Carolina#1,241 · 1 in 8,890
Best ever in a state: #119 in District of Columbia, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #611 | 47 | 1 in 3,389 |
| Arizona | #624 | 11 | 1 in 3,129 |
| California | #809 | 43 | 1 in 5,322 |
| Illinois | #994 | 10 | 1 in 6,849 |
| North Carolina | #1,241 | 5 | 1 in 8,890 |
| Georgia | #1,427 | 5 | 1 in 10,105 |
| New York | #1,676 | 7 | 1 in 13,858 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Arleth
- 159 spots since 2024 (#428 → #269)
- 955 spots since 2020 (#1,224 → #269)
- 1,524 spots since 2015 (#1,793 → #269)
- Biggest jump: 494 spots in 2005 (#1,314 → #820)
- Biggest drop: 277 spots in 2006 (#820 → #1,097)
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 2025 at #269 (1,156 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 6 yrs · run 2021–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,390 girls born in 2025 were named Arleth (0.07%)
- 48.7% of all girls named Arleth (3,330) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 175 | #2,307 (1999) | #8,095 |
| 2000s | 1,709 | #820 (2005) | #1,366 |
| 2010s | 1,626 | #1,034 (2016) | #1,517 |
| 2020s | 3,330 | #269 (2025) | #680 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Arleth in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 11,335 of them was named Arleth, which outranked 93.0% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,308Briseyda163
- #1,308Jersey163
- #1,308Magaly163
- #1,314Arleth162
- #1,314Alysia162
- #1,314Isha162
- #1,314Karolina162
- #1,324Bayleigh161
- #1,324Kaytlin161
- #1,324Keeley161
Tied with 9 names at #1,314; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.