Ashlie
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · Last seen for boys in 1984 at #6,315
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1988 · 565 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 10,073since 1963
Ashlie over time
Rank among girls' names. Ashlie has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | — | |
| 2024 | #5,799 | 21 | — | |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 | — | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | — | |
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | — | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #7,025 | 16 | — | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | — | |
| 2017 | #7,092 | 16 | — | |
| 2016 | #6,186 | 20 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | — | |
| 2014 | #6,207 | 20 | — | |
| 2013 | #6,255 | 20 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,486 | 32 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,916 | 38 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,123 | 53 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,752 | 65 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,718 | 67 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,034 | 100 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,894 | 107 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,479 | 142 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,353 | 156 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,171 | 184 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,179 | 174 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,250 | 158 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,019 | 207 | — | |
| 1999 | #986 | 209 | — | |
| 1998 | #896 | 235 | — | |
| 1997 | #797 | 260 | — | |
| 1996 | #678 | 322 | — | |
| 1995 | #645 | 335 | — | |
| 1994 | #579 | 395 | — | |
| 1993 | #571 | 417 | — | |
| 1992 | #506 | 475 | — | |
| 1991 | #488 | 489 | — | |
| 1990 | #476 | 514 | — | |
| 1989 | #448 | 543 | — | |
| 1988 | #412 | 565 | — | |
| 1987 | #435 | 508 | — | |
| 1986 | #412 | 534 | — | |
| 1985 | #418 | 533 | — | |
| 1984 | #469 | 443 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | #474 | 421 | — | |
| 1982 | #703 | 250 | — | |
| 1981 | #942 | 157 | — | |
| 1980 | #959 | 154 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,140 | 117 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,117 | 116 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,231 | 98 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,397 | 76 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,097 | 41 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,029 | 41 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,127 | 37 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,598 | 27 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,340 | 33 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,779 | 25 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ashlie! It came in at #6,592, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963–1965, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Ashlie is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oregon#615 · 1 in 3,205
- Oklahoma#657 · 1 in 3,322
- Colorado#722 · 1 in 4,140
- Indiana#779 · 1 in 5,380
- Missouri#787 · 1 in 5,583
Best ever in a state: #120 in Idaho, 1985.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon | #615 | 5 | 1 in 3,205 |
| Oklahoma | #657 | 5 | 1 in 3,322 |
| Colorado | #722 | 6 | 1 in 4,140 |
| Indiana | #779 | 6 | 1 in 5,380 |
| Missouri | #787 | 5 | 1 in 5,583 |
| Washington | #889 | 5 | 1 in 5,683 |
| Michigan | #913 | 7 | 1 in 6,968 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,079 | 6 | 1 in 9,210 |
| Ohio | #1,112 | 6 | 1 in 9,700 |
| Georgia | #1,140 | 6 | 1 in 8,068 |
| Texas | #1,177 | 18 | 1 in 8,664 |
| California | #1,251 | 22 | 1 in 10,124 |
| Florida | #1,334 | 7 | 1 in 11,003 |
| New York | #1,474 | 8 | 1 in 12,110 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ashlie
- 4,308 spots since 2024 (#5,799 → #10,107)
- 4,071 spots since 2015 (#6,036 → #10,107)
- Biggest jump: 239 spots in 1982 (#942 → #703)
- Biggest drop: 119 spots in 1997 (#678 → #797)
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 1988 at #412 (565 births)
- Births halved by 1997, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 1980–1999
- Highest: 1 in 3,152 girls born in 1988 were named Ashlie (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 178,585 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 40.8% of all girls named Ashlie (4,108) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42 | #3,656 (1967) | #5,145 |
| 1970s | 611 | #1,117 (1978) | #1,886 |
| 1980s | 4,108 | #412 (1988) | #567 |
| 1990s | 3,651 | #476 (1990) | #662 |
| 2000s | 1,360 | #1,019 (2000) | #1,685 |
| 2010s | 242 | #3,123 (2010) | #6,412 |
| 2020s | 59 | #5,799 (2024) | #9,397 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ashlie in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 10,327 of them was named Ashlie, which outranked 93.5% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,175Gemma175
- #1,175Kalie175
- #1,175Kylah175
- #1,179Ashlie174
- #1,179Adelaide174
- #1,179Chantal174
- #1,179Janette174
- #1,185Alliyah173
- #1,185Cielo173
- #1,185Danica173
Tied with 5 names at #1,179; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.