Ava
#11 for girls in 2025, 7,732 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2016 · 16,354 births
- Debut · girls
- 13 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 24 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 344,097since 1880
Ava over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11 | 7,732 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #9 | 8,700 | — | |
| 2023 | #8 | 9,737 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #7 | 11,107 | #8,300 | 9 |
| 2021 | #5 | 12,873 | #8,825 | 8 |
| 2020 | #3 | 13,201 | #7,034 | 11 |
| 2019 | #3 | 14,549 | — | |
| 2018 | #3 | 15,034 | #7,617 | 10 |
| 2017 | #3 | 16,017 | #6,338 | 13 |
| 2016 | #3 | 16,354 | #7,157 | 11 |
| 2015 | #4 | 16,416 | #4,890 | 19 |
| 2014 | #5 | 15,727 | #5,733 | 15 |
| 2013 | #5 | 15,271 | #5,171 | 17 |
| 2012 | #5 | 15,549 | #4,686 | 20 |
| 2011 | #5 | 15,518 | #5,200 | 17 |
| 2010 | #5 | 15,444 | #5,251 | 17 |
| 2009 | #5 | 15,877 | #4,278 | 23 |
| 2008 | #5 | 17,051 | #5,487 | 16 |
| 2007 | #4 | 18,053 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #5 | 16,941 | #4,001 | 24 |
| 2005 | #9 | 13,606 | #3,389 | 29 |
| 2004 | #25 | 8,645 | #2,887 | 35 |
| 2003 | #39 | 6,280 | #7,245 | 9 |
| 2002 | #82 | 3,751 | — | |
| 2001 | #132 | 2,539 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #180 | 1,796 | — | |
| 1999 | #259 | 1,215 | — | |
| 1998 | #350 | 831 | — | |
| 1997 | #618 | 362 | — | |
| 1996 | #740 | 285 | — | |
| 1995 | #734 | 279 | — | |
| 1994 | #751 | 276 | — | |
| 1993 | #734 | 286 | — | |
| 1992 | #835 | 239 | — | |
| 1991 | #847 | 236 | — | |
| 1990 | #950 | 198 | — | |
| 1989 | #986 | 175 | — | |
| 1988 | #986 | 167 | — | |
| 1987 | #931 | 176 | — | |
| 1986 | #950 | 166 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,081 | 134 | — | |
| 1984 | #988 | 146 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,200 | 107 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,221 | 109 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,122 | 123 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,183 | 113 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,051 | 132 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,031 | 132 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,191 | 103 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,182 | 96 | — | |
| 1975 | #973 | 127 | — | |
| 1974 | #950 | 130 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,066 | 108 | — | |
| 1972 | #848 | 153 | — | |
| 1971 | #848 | 161 | — | |
| 1970 | #789 | 177 | — | |
| 1969 | #786 | 170 | — | |
| 1968 | #743 | 177 | — | |
| 1967 | #736 | 176 | — | |
| 1966 | #695 | 199 | — | |
| 1965 | #649 | 227 | — | |
| 1964 | #610 | 268 | — | |
| 1963 | #604 | 273 | — | |
| 1962 | #618 | 263 | — | |
| 1961 | #631 | 262 | — | |
| 1960 | #532 | 327 | — | |
| 1959 | #528 | 337 | — | |
| 1958 | #492 | 378 | — | |
| 1957 | #455 | 432 | — | |
| 1956 | #401 | 509 | — | |
| 1955 | #388 | 508 | — | |
| 1954 | #376 | 540 | — | |
| 1953 | #394 | 462 | — | |
| 1952 | #435 | 388 | — | |
| 1951 | #426 | 384 | — | |
| 1950 | #469 | 299 | — | |
| 1949 | #534 | 240 | — | |
| 1948 | #593 | 197 | — | |
| 1947 | #603 | 199 | — | |
| 1946 | #703 | 131 | — | |
| 1945 | #842 | 80 | — | |
| 1944 | #801 | 91 | — | |
| 1943 | #742 | 109 | — | |
| 1942 | #648 | 132 | — | |
| 1941 | #756 | 89 | — | |
| 1940 | #802 | 78 | — | |
| 1939 | #717 | 90 | — | |
| 1938 | #764 | 83 | — | |
| 1937 | #634 | 114 | — | |
| 1936 | #620 | 113 | — | |
| 1935 | #621 | 109 | — | |
| 1934 | #564 | 129 | — | |
| 1933 | #592 | 119 | — | |
| 1932 | #541 | 145 | — | |
| 1931 | #561 | 136 | — | |
| 1930 | #571 | 142 | — | |
| 1929 | #588 | 135 | — | |
| 1928 | #604 | 135 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | #598 | 141 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #547 | 164 | — | |
| 1925 | #560 | 164 | — | |
| 1924 | #587 | 157 | — | |
| 1923 | #546 | 173 | — | |
| 1922 | #567 | 160 | — | |
| 1921 | #537 | 177 | — | |
| 1920 | #515 | 184 | — | |
| 1919 | #546 | 159 | — | |
| 1918 | #529 | 174 | — | |
| 1917 | #492 | 180 | — | |
| 1916 | #466 | 186 | — | |
| 1915 | #471 | 171 | — | |
| 1914 | #434 | 156 | — | |
| 1913 | #477 | 112 | — | |
| 1912 | #483 | 98 | — | |
| 1911 | #438 | 86 | — | |
| 1910 | #449 | 79 | — | |
| 1909 | #541 | 49 | — | |
| 1908 | #474 | 58 | — | |
| 1907 | #481 | 55 | — | |
| 1906 | #437 | 62 | — | |
| 1905 | #464 | 53 | — | |
| 1904 | #463 | 50 | — | |
| 1903 | #428 | 55 | — | |
| 1902 | #502 | 40 | — | |
| 1901 | #435 | 46 | — | |
| 1900 | #417 | 65 | — | |
| 1899 | #438 | 44 | — | |
| 1898 | #422 | 53 | — | |
| 1897 | #453 | 42 | — | |
| 1896 | #467 | 38 | — | |
| 1895 | #379 | 54 | — | |
| 1894 | #367 | 58 | — | |
| 1893 | #394 | 46 | — | |
| 1892 | #360 | 54 | — | |
| 1891 | #387 | 41 | — | |
| 1890 | #361 | 49 | — | |
| 1889 | #362 | 44 | — | |
| 1888 | #374 | 41 | — | |
| 1887 | #360 | 36 | — | |
| 1886 | #416 | 27 | — | |
| 1885 | #500 | 18 | — | |
| 1884 | #349 | 32 | — | |
| 1883 | #331 | 29 | — | |
| 1882 | #389 | 21 | — | |
| 1881 | #393 | 18 | — | |
| 1880 | #466 | 13 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ava was already there! It came in at #466, and was given to 13 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 19 girls a year got the name.
Where Ava is popular in 1951
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- North Carolina#216 · 1 in 1,296
- Oklahoma#274 · 1 in 2,157
- Virginia#302 · 1 in 2,499
- New Mexico#310 · 1 in 1,912
- Kansas#336 · 1 in 3,255
Best ever in a state: #1 in Minnesota, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #216 | 39 | 1 in 1,296 |
| Oklahoma | #274 | 10 | 1 in 2,157 |
| Virginia | #302 | 15 | 1 in 2,499 |
| New Mexico | #310 | 5 | 1 in 1,912 |
| Kansas | #336 | 6 | 1 in 3,255 |
| Tennessee | #340 | 11 | 1 in 3,447 |
| New Jersey | #350 | 10 | 1 in 4,635 |
| West Virginia | #357 | 6 | 1 in 3,822 |
| Colorado | #362 | 5 | 1 in 3,120 |
| Missouri | #362 | 10 | 1 in 4,115 |
| Florida | #364 | 10 | 1 in 3,085 |
| Indiana | #371 | 10 | 1 in 4,533 |
| New York | #372 | 39 | 1 in 3,839 |
| Georgia | #373 | 12 | 1 in 3,576 |
| Alabama | #376 | 10 | 1 in 3,654 |
| Kentucky | #377 | 8 | 1 in 4,241 |
| Iowa | #380 | 6 | 1 in 4,907 |
| Massachusetts | #382 | 6 | 1 in 7,726 |
| Texas | #401 | 32 | 1 in 3,187 |
| Arkansas | #408 | 5 | 1 in 4,125 |
| Michigan | #414 | 15 | 1 in 5,232 |
| Illinois | #428 | 16 | 1 in 5,742 |
| South Carolina | #437 | 6 | 1 in 4,740 |
| Washington | #443 | 5 | 1 in 5,161 |
| Mississippi | #449 | 6 | 1 in 4,767 |
| Louisiana | #479 | 7 | 1 in 5,062 |
| Ohio | #499 | 11 | 1 in 8,304 |
| California | #531 | 19 | 1 in 6,364 |
| Pennsylvania | #545 | 11 | 1 in 9,863 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ava
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 2 spots since 2024 (#9 → #11)
- 8 spots since 2020 (#3 → #11)
- 7 spots since 2015 (#4 → #11)
- Biggest jump: 268 spots in 1998 (#618 → #350)
- Biggest drop: 218 spots in 1973 (#848 → #1,066)
Rise & fade · girls
136 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2016 at #3 (16,354 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 20 yrs
- Top 10: 20 yrs · run 2005–2024
- Top 100: 24 yrs · run 2002–2025
- Top 1,000: 136 yrs · run 1880–1972
Share of babies · girls
1 in 106
- Highest: 1 in 106 girls born in 2007 were named Ava (0.94%)
- Latest: 1 in 208 girls born in 2025 (0.48%)
- Its best rank, #3 in 2016, was only 1 in 108 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 45.3% of all girls named Ava (155,879) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 279 | #331 (1883) | #394 |
| 1890s | 479 | #360 (1892) | #403 |
| 1900s | 533 | #417 (1900) | #464 |
| 1910s | 1,401 | #434 (1914) | #479 |
| 1920s | 1,590 | #515 (1920) | #565 |
| 1930s | 1,180 | #541 (1932) | #619 |
| 1940s | 1,346 | #534 (1949) | #702 |
| 1950s | 4,237 | #376 (1954) | #436 |
| 1960s | 2,342 | #532 (1960) | #660 |
| 1970s | 1,319 | #789 (1970) | #993 |
| 1980s | 1,416 | #931 (1987) | #1,065 |
| 1990s | 4,207 | #259 (1999) | #682 |
| 2000s | 104,539 | #4 (2007) | #49 |
| 2010s | 155,879 | #3 (2016) | #4 |
| 2020s | 63,350 | #3 (2020) | #7 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ava in 1951
girls
#426
384 births · 1 in 4,690 girls
Top girls' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 4,690 of them was named Ava, which outranked 93.1% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Ava
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 1950
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.