Caeden
Last seen for girls in 2011 at #16,764 · #3,658 for boys in 2025, 30 births
Given to boys 98.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2002 · 127 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,181since 1994
Caeden over time
Rank among boys' names. Caeden has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,658 | 30 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,455 | 33 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,228 | 37 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,675 | 49 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,918 | 42 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,886 | 41 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,943 | 41 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,893 | 41 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,798 | 43 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,228 | 60 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,895 | 77 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,979 | 72 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,733 | 84 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,637 | 94 | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #1,459 | 112 |
| 2010 | — | #1,408 | 118 | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #1,202 | 150 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #1,263 | 138 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #1,287 | 135 |
| 2006 | — | #1,289 | 129 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,372 | 109 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #1,251 | 120 |
| 2003 | — | #1,348 | 101 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,127 | 127 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,629 | 72 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,815 | 59 | |
| 1999 | — | #2,608 | 33 | |
| 1998 | — | #5,466 | 11 | |
| 1997 | — | #8,110 | 6 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #8,868 | 5 | |
| 1994 | — | #7,770 | 6 | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Caeden! It came in at #7,770, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1994–1997, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Caeden is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Indiana#677 · 1 in 6,458
- Florida#916 · 1 in 9,561
- Ohio#930 · 1 in 11,111
- Texas#1,074 · 1 in 13,780
- California#1,474 · 1 in 25,212
Best ever in a state: #320 in Nebraska, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #677 | 6 | 1 in 6,458 |
| Florida | #916 | 10 | 1 in 9,561 |
| Ohio | #930 | 6 | 1 in 11,111 |
| Texas | #1,074 | 13 | 1 in 13,780 |
| California | #1,474 | 10 | 1 in 25,212 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Caeden
- 203 spots since 2024 (#3,455 → #3,658)
- 772 spots since 2020 (#2,886 → #3,658)
- 1,763 spots since 2015 (#1,895 → #3,658)
- Debuted 1994
- Peaked 2002 at #1,127 (127 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 13,224 boys born in 2009 were named Caeden (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 56,936 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,127 in 2002, was only 1 in 15,288 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 52.3% of all boys named Caeden (1,140) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67 | #2,608 (1999) | #6,799 |
| 2000s | 1,140 | #1,127 (2002) | #1,358 |
| 2010s | 742 | #1,408 (2010) | #2,097 |
| 2020s | 232 | #2,675 (2022) | #3,137 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Caeden in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
Top boys' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 306,042 of them was named Caeden, which outranked 24.7% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #12,761Zynia7
- #12,761Zyniah7
- #12,761Zyra7
- #14,179Caeden6
- #14,179Aaliha6
- #14,179Aalijah6
- #14,179Aalisha6
- #16,099Aafreen5
- #16,099Aajah5
- #16,099Aala5
Tied with 1,919 names at #14,179; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,984,979 boys got a published name in 2004; 1 in 16,541 of them was named Caeden, which outranked 90.5% of the 13,228 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,246Finley121
- #1,246Jaquez121
- #1,246Khamani121
- #1,251Caeden120
- #1,251Antwone120
- #1,251Bowen120
- #1,251Dax120
- #1,267Ervin119
- #1,267Jackie119
- #1,267Sameer119
Tied with 15 names at #1,251; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.