Camilla

#361 for girls in 2025, 847 births · Last seen for boys in 1918 at #3,728
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2020 · 1,169 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
30,276
since 1880

Camilla over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Camilla has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201992peak #263, 2020girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#361847—
2024#322956—
2023#336926—
2022#3141,020—
2021#3071,041—
2020#2631,169—
2019#2711,224—
2018#3031,099—
2017#3081,060—
2016#342976—
2015#374874—
2014#363893—
2013#400767—
2012#442707—
2011#458649—
2010#506591—
2009#553552—
2008#634487—
2007#730399—
2006#823330—
2005#874290—
2004#912265—
2003#889271—
2002#1,022212—
2001#961226—
2000#1,199166—
1999#1,231153—
1998#1,141166—
1997#1,133165—
1996#1,238141—
1995#1,131155—
1994#1,285132—
1993#1,185146—
1992#1,322127—
1991#1,371118—
1990#1,479105—
1989#1,326117—
1988#1,204125—
1987#1,136130—
1986#1,241110—
1985#1,178120—
1984#1,260101—
1983#1,060131—
1982#1,131124—
1981#1,089128—
1980#1,268102—
1979#1,136118—
1978#986140—
1977#1,25795—
1976#1,086112—
1975#1,127103—
1974#992123—
1973#943128—
1972#918135—
1971#1,000125—
1970#867154—
1969#766175—
1968#868139—
1967#770163—
1966#826145—
1965#784159—
1964#786173—
1963#805166—
1962#890141—
1961#840158—
1960#832153—
1959#883138—
1958#888132—
1957#989110—
1956#893125—
1955#763156—
1954#780144—
1953#837122—
1952#775133—
1951#744139—
1950#689155—
1949#702145—
1948#661159—
1947#697147—
1946#662144—
1945#654126—
1944#484219—
1943#681124—
1942#663127—
1941#628127—
1940#635123—
1939#599126—
1938#659108—
1937#634114—
1936#67297—
1935#629107—
1934#73283—
1933#616111—
1932#624114—
1931#631110—
1930#646114—
1929#612125—
1928#620129—
1927#711103—
1926#696107—
1925#664123—
1924#637138—
1923#599147—
1922#624139—
1921#641134—
1920#622132—
1919#633121—
1918#538170#3,7286
1917#632116—
1916#577135—
1915#565129—
1914#60888—
1913#59475—
1912#57670—
1911#67641—
1910#62046—
1909#58743—
1908#72928—
1907#52946—
1906#63332—
1905#57037—
1904#57634—
1903#55834—
1902#71623—
1901#61526—
1900#53140—
1899#49036—
1898#58131—
1897#66022—
1896#56529—
1895#53830—
1894#59724—
1893#63021—
1892#61621—
1891#60819—
1890#55822—
1889#68714—
1888#66315—
1887#52418—
1886#60614—
1885#55715—
1884#52016—
1883#56112—
1882#53012—
1881#50311—
1880#7386—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Camilla was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.

Where Camilla is popular in 1992

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMINew York: #1,127 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 10,555 girlsNYMassachusetts: #647 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,980 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,694 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 19,754 girlsCAUtah: #271 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,381 girlsUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #623 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,979 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Camilla, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Utah#271 · 1 in 1,381
  2. North Carolina#623 · 1 in 4,979
  3. Massachusetts#647 · 1 in 5,980
  4. New York#1,127 · 1 in 10,555
  5. California#1,694 · 1 in 19,754

Best ever in a state: #105 in Rhode Island, 2024.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#271101 in 1,381
North Carolina#62381 in 4,979
Massachusetts#64761 in 5,980
New York#1,127111 in 10,555
California#1,694131 in 19,754
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Camilla
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 39 spots since 2024 (#322 → #361)
  • 98 spots since 2020 (#263 → #361)
  • 13 spots since 2015 (#374 → #361)
  • Biggest jump: 271 spots in 1978 (#1,257 → #986)
  • Biggest drop: 200 spots in 1908 (#529 → #729)
Rise & fade · girls
140 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2020 at #263 (1,169 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 120 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1880–1974
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,371
  • Highest: 1 in 1,371 girls born in 2019 were named Camilla (0.07%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,898 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
  • Its best rank, #263 in 2020, was only 1 in 1,383 (0.07%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 29.2% of all girls named Camilla (8,840) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s133#503 (1881)#589
1890s255#490 (1899)#584
1900s343#529 (1907)#604
1910s991#538 (1918)#602
1920s1,277#599 (1923)#643
1930s1,084#599 (1939)#644
1940s1,441#484 (1944)#647
1950s1,354#689 (1950)#824
1960s1,572#766 (1969)#817
1970s1,233#867 (1970)#1,031
1980s1,188#1,060 (1983)#1,189
1990s1,408#1,131 (1995)#1,252
2000s3,198#553 (2009)#860
2010s8,840#271 (2019)#377
2020s5,959#263 (2020)#317

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Camilla in 1992

girls
#1,322
127 births · 1 in 14,519 girls

Top girls' names in 1992

  1. #1Ashley38,460
  2. #2Jessica38,361
  3. #3Amanda25,039
  4. #4Brittany24,983
  5. #5Sarah24,634
  6. #6Samantha24,407
  7. #7Emily21,835
  8. #8Stephanie19,680
  9. #9Elizabeth19,035
  10. #10Megan17,842
  11. #1,322Camilla127
More about 1992

girls

1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 14,519 of them was named Camilla, which outranked 91.5% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Camilla
  1. #1,312Keona128
  2. #1,312Nicollette128
  3. #1,312Tatum128
  4. #1,322Camilla127
  5. #1,322Britnee127
  6. #1,322Corrie127
  7. #1,322Danelle127
  8. #1,329Drew126
  9. #1,329Francine126
  10. #1,329Jazzmine126

Tied with 6 names at #1,322; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1991
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,282Darian#2,989 → #707
  2. ↑ 1,958Payton#2,660 → #702
  3. ↑ 1,450Peyton#2,034 → #584
  4. ↑ 1,115Chandler#1,656 → #541
  5. ↑ 1,080Brianda#1,857 → #777
Fallers
  1. ↓ 855Rebeccah#1,000 → #1,855
  2. ↓ 725Ieshia#717 → #1,442
  3. ↓ 502Miesha#997 → #1,499
  4. ↓ 470Unknown#794 → #1,264
  5. ↓ 356Phylicia#928 → #1,284

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1992 →