Celestine

#3,211 for girls in 2025, 49 births · Last seen for boys in 1941 at #3,133
Given to girls 97.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1902 · 41 births
Debut · girls
12 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
9,809
since 1880

Celestine over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Celestine has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201962peak #490, 1902girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,21149—
2024#3,96337—
2023#4,87327—
2022#4,47231—
2021#4,71928—
2020#5,16824—
2019#5,61222—
2018#6,52118—
2017#5,04526—
2016#4,42332—
2015#4,98127—
2014#6,45119—
2013#8,13514—
2012#7,14417—
2011#12,1538—
2010#9,23112—
2009#8,05815—
2008#11,5999—
2007#6,32321—
2006#6,59219—
2005#5,26624—
2004#5,74421—
2003#6,05519—
2002#6,39217—
2001#5,36421—
2000#5,93718—
1999#4,71823—
1998#3,91429—
1997#4,00727—
1996#4,73921—
1995#3,15236—
1994#5,98415—
1993#4,25724—
1992#4,68621—
1991#2,98938—
1990#3,43631—
1989#3,67327—
1988#2,93135—
1987#4,12220—
1986#3,05430—
1985#4,45517—
1984#3,06928—
1983#4,68615—
1982#3,64722—
1981#3,85920—
1980#3,50623—
1979#2,52536—
1978#2,43136—
1977#2,66631—
1976#2,33435—
1975#2,51631—
1974#1,82048—
1973#1,47864—
1972#1,65554—
1971#1,64056—
1970#1,43072—
1969#1,18289—
1968#1,33469—
1967#1,17282—
1966#1,06397—
1965#1,07994—
1964#1,032109—
1963#929129—
1962#939128—
1961#1,070104—
1960#897137—
1959#904133—
1958#844146—
1957#777167—
1956#806152—
1955#748161—
1954#677189—
1953#724157—
1952#634195—
1951#647182—
1950#625183—
1949#611183—
1948#658161—
1947#650164—
1946#723125—
1945#631133—
1944#610146—
1943#651136—
1942#631142—
1941#645121#3,1336
1940#632124—
1939#674101#3,4805
1938#565146—
1937#72686—
1936#635109#2,8547
1935#600118—
1934#667101—
1933#546137#2,36810
1932#565133#3,0927
1931#600122—
1930#661108#3,2897
1929#593132#3,9595
1928#625127#2,38712
1927#664117#2,70310
1926#618133#2,9049
1925#572157#3,7416
1924#587157#2,13215
1923#616142#1,94117
1922#573158#2,24014
1921#573157#3,2148
1920#570158#2,60211
1919#626125#2,51111
1918#697106#1,99816
1917#630117#2,42311
1916#593128#3,8975
1915#603118#2,31011
1914#69269#2,10110
1913#62867#1,67611
1912#68953#1,8858
1911#74134—
1910#57052—
1909#66935—
1908#67832—
1907#63734—
1906#54142—
1905#60034—
1904#71024—
1903#58931—
1902#49041—
1901#65923—
1900#63930—
1899#70420—
1898#54434—
1897#50933—
1896#65123—
1895#63823—
1894#66420—
1893#56125—
1892#79614—
1891#54123—
1890#64217—
1889#62017—
1888#52523—
1887#9377—
1886#8977—
1885#9216—
1884#54115—
1883#57911—
1882#7407—
1881——
1880#49212—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Celestine was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Celestine is popular in 1962

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMNIllinois: #759 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 11,430 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWIMichigan: #780 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 13,680 girlsMINew York: #657 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 8,599 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,308 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 24,783 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNEMissouri: #630 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,518 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedVAMaryland: #509 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,857 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #560 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,812 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #397 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,172 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #651 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,342 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMSAlabama: #604 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,669 girlsALGeorgia: #523 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,460 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedTXFlorida: #648 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 7,029 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Carolina#397 · 1 in 3,172
  2. Maryland#509 · 1 in 5,857
  3. Georgia#523 · 1 in 5,460
  4. North Carolina#560 · 1 in 6,812
  5. Alabama#604 · 1 in 6,669

Best ever in a state: #141 in District of Columbia, 1934.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#39781 in 3,172
Maryland#50951 in 5,857
Georgia#52381 in 5,460
North Carolina#56071 in 6,812
Alabama#60451 in 6,669
Missouri#63051 in 8,518
Florida#64871 in 7,029
Louisiana#65161 in 6,342
New York#657191 in 8,599
Illinois#75991 in 11,430
Michigan#78061 in 13,680
California#1,30871 in 24,783
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Celestine
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 752 spots since 2024 (#3,963 → #3,211)
  • 1,957 spots since 2020 (#5,168 → #3,211)
  • 1,770 spots since 2015 (#4,981 → #3,211)
  • Biggest jump: 412 spots in 1888 (#937 → #525)
  • Biggest drop: 380 spots in 1885 (#541 → #921)
Rise & fade · girls
22 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1902 at #490 (41 births)
  • Births halved by 1981, 79 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 82 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1882–1960
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,441
  • Highest: 1 in 6,441 girls born in 1902 were named Celestine (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 32,801 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 17.0% of all girls named Celestine (1,665) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s105#492 (1880)#695
1890s232#509 (1897)#625
1900s326#490 (1902)#621
1910s869#570 (1910)#647
1920s1,438#570 (1920)#599
1930s1,161#546 (1933)#624
1940s1,435#610 (1944)#644
1950s1,665#625 (1950)#739
1960s1,038#897 (1960)#1,070
1970s463#1,430 (1970)#2,050
1980s237#2,931 (1988)#3,700
1990s265#2,989 (1991)#4,188
2000s184#5,266 (2005)#6,733
2010s195#4,423 (2016)#6,970
2020s196#3,211 (2025)#4,401

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Celestine in 1962

girls
#939
128 births · 1 in 15,364 girls

Top girls' names in 1962

  1. #1Lisa46,069
  2. #2Mary43,502
  3. #3Susan35,752
  4. #4Karen35,184
  5. #5Linda31,461
  6. #6Patricia26,532
  7. #7Donna25,719
  8. #8Cynthia24,025
  9. #9Deborah22,889
  10. #10Sandra22,420
  11. #939Celestine128
More about 1962

girls

1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 15,364 of them was named Celestine, which outranked 87.6% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Celestine
  1. #934Mark129
  2. #934Rosita129
  3. #934Thea129
  4. #939Celestine128
  5. #939Barbra128
  6. #939Kandi128
  7. #939Marilee128
  8. #944Shiela127
  9. #945Cherrie126
  10. #945Evette126

Tied with 4 names at #939; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,281Tiffany#2,070 → #789
  2. ↑ 879Whitney#1,627 → #748
  3. ↑ 541Zina#1,533 → #992
  4. ↑ 414Glynis#1,406 → #992
  5. ↑ 408Lolita#978 → #570
Fallers
  1. ↓ 300Fern#821 → #1,121
  2. ↓ 259Jacklyn#815 → #1,074
  3. ↓ 255Dorthy#929 → #1,184
  4. ↓ 224Laurene#943 → #1,167
  5. ↓ 215Jimmie#911 → #1,126

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1962 →