Daisy
#75 for girls in 2025, 3,206 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1882 · 648 births
- Debut · girls
- 564 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 31 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 158,723since 1880
Daisy over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #75 | 3,206 | — | |
| 2024 | #76 | 3,102 | — | |
| 2023 | #110 | 2,426 | — | |
| 2022 | #124 | 2,325 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #134 | 2,087 | — | |
| 2020 | #143 | 1,896 | — | |
| 2019 | #164 | 1,742 | — | |
| 2018 | #169 | 1,718 | — | |
| 2017 | #170 | 1,796 | — | |
| 2016 | #189 | 1,732 | — | |
| 2015 | #183 | 1,772 | — | |
| 2014 | #180 | 1,791 | — | |
| 2013 | #198 | 1,633 | — | |
| 2012 | #174 | 1,784 | — | |
| 2011 | #167 | 1,896 | — | |
| 2010 | #151 | 2,020 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #153 | 2,074 | — | |
| 2008 | #161 | 2,075 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #167 | 2,159 | — | |
| 2006 | #149 | 2,300 | — | |
| 2005 | #150 | 2,323 | — | |
| 2004 | #144 | 2,271 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #136 | 2,410 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #138 | 2,456 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #139 | 2,371 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #141 | 2,368 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 1999 | #133 | 2,470 | — | |
| 1998 | #136 | 2,449 | — | |
| 1997 | #140 | 2,303 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #124 | 2,514 | #4,613 | 13 |
| 1995 | #145 | 2,224 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #177 | 1,668 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #185 | 1,579 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #187 | 1,654 | #2,747 | 25 |
| 1991 | #185 | 1,609 | #4,476 | 12 |
| 1990 | #193 | 1,521 | #3,607 | 16 |
| 1989 | #218 | 1,256 | #3,446 | 16 |
| 1988 | #225 | 1,166 | #2,367 | 25 |
| 1987 | #312 | 774 | #2,559 | 21 |
| 1986 | #305 | 801 | #2,601 | 20 |
| 1985 | #261 | 958 | #2,942 | 16 |
| 1984 | #225 | 1,145 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #214 | 1,175 | #2,912 | 15 |
| 1982 | #366 | 633 | #5,003 | 7 |
| 1981 | #328 | 723 | #3,858 | 10 |
| 1980 | #418 | 528 | — | |
| 1979 | #519 | 371 | — | |
| 1978 | #606 | 282 | — | |
| 1977 | #554 | 316 | — | |
| 1976 | #544 | 320 | — | |
| 1975 | #529 | 328 | — | |
| 1974 | #533 | 314 | #5,227 | 5 |
| 1973 | #561 | 293 | — | |
| 1972 | #628 | 247 | — | |
| 1971 | #577 | 303 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #575 | 309 | — | |
| 1969 | #569 | 298 | — | |
| 1968 | #585 | 268 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #565 | 281 | — | |
| 1966 | #529 | 317 | — | |
| 1965 | #520 | 337 | — | |
| 1964 | #507 | 374 | — | |
| 1963 | #492 | 390 | — | |
| 1962 | #488 | 395 | — | |
| 1961 | #478 | 413 | — | |
| 1960 | #453 | 465 | — | |
| 1959 | #449 | 460 | — | |
| 1958 | #400 | 531 | — | |
| 1957 | #420 | 493 | — | |
| 1956 | #407 | 493 | — | |
| 1955 | #394 | 497 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #385 | 500 | — | |
| 1953 | #362 | 550 | — | |
| 1952 | #369 | 502 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #343 | 540 | — | |
| 1950 | #336 | 533 | — | |
| 1949 | #321 | 580 | — | |
| 1948 | #302 | 646 | — | |
| 1947 | #304 | 678 | — | |
| 1946 | #307 | 579 | — | |
| 1945 | #271 | 636 | — | |
| 1944 | #242 | 741 | — | |
| 1943 | #255 | 760 | — | |
| 1942 | #240 | 799 | — | |
| 1941 | #233 | 741 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #218 | 774 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #210 | 822 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #216 | 786 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #204 | 812 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #212 | 777 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #194 | 903 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #187 | 939 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #197 | 873 | #1,997 | 13 |
| 1932 | #176 | 1,078 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #178 | 1,009 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #181 | 1,064 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1929 | #182 | 1,080 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #169 | 1,245 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #172 | 1,242 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #171 | 1,288 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #169 | 1,400 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #166 | 1,460 | #2,473 | 12 |
| 1923 | #163 | 1,443 | — | |
| 1922 | #157 | 1,530 | #3,532 | 7 |
| 1921 | #160 | 1,481 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #155 | 1,489 | #2,765 | 10 |
| 1919 | #148 | 1,496 | #2,877 | 9 |
| 1918 | #149 | 1,525 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #150 | 1,417 | #3,545 | 6 |
| 1916 | #137 | 1,511 | #2,730 | 9 |
| 1915 | #131 | 1,518 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #126 | 1,202 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #123 | 1,052 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #112 | 1,044 | #2,045 | 7 |
| 1911 | #108 | 833 | — | |
| 1910 | #101 | 877 | #1,421 | 6 |
| 1909 | #102 | 754 | — | |
| 1908 | #99 | 765 | — | |
| 1907 | #98 | 739 | — | |
| 1906 | #90 | 773 | #1,111 | 6 |
| 1905 | #87 | 776 | — | |
| 1904 | #85 | 772 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #82 | 776 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #85 | 748 | #1,013 | 6 |
| 1901 | #87 | 653 | — | |
| 1900 | #81 | 931 | — | |
| 1899 | #85 | 660 | — | |
| 1898 | #84 | 712 | #1,002 | 6 |
| 1897 | #86 | 624 | — | |
| 1896 | #83 | 661 | — | |
| 1895 | #84 | 665 | #1,079 | 5 |
| 1894 | #81 | 645 | — | |
| 1893 | #84 | 573 | #907 | 6 |
| 1892 | #85 | 564 | — | |
| 1891 | #79 | 557 | — | |
| 1890 | #76 | 588 | — | |
| 1889 | #73 | 583 | — | |
| 1888 | #73 | 612 | #755 | 8 |
| 1887 | #67 | 532 | — | |
| 1886 | #63 | 602 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #60 | 607 | — | |
| 1884 | #54 | 685 | — | |
| 1883 | #50 | 659 | #892 | 5 |
| 1882 | #48 | 648 | — | |
| 1881 | #49 | 562 | — | |
| 1880 | #48 | 564 | #909 | 5 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Daisy was already there! It came in at #48, and was given to 564 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1965–1978, when fewer than 340 girls a year got the name.
Where Daisy is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alaska#13 · 1 in 30
- South Carolina#57 · 1 in 190
- Alabama#59 · 1 in 205
- Georgia#61 · 1 in 218
- Florida#65 · 1 in 217
Best ever in a state: #13 in Alaska, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | #13 | 5 | 1 in 30 |
| South Carolina | #57 | 101 | 1 in 190 |
| Alabama | #59 | 126 | 1 in 205 |
| Georgia | #61 | 144 | 1 in 218 |
| Florida | #65 | 40 | 1 in 217 |
| North Carolina | #72 | 121 | 1 in 252 |
| Mississippi | #84 | 60 | 1 in 300 |
| Louisiana | #87 | 60 | 1 in 296 |
| Oklahoma | #88 | 57 | 1 in 322 |
| West Virginia | #97 | 36 | 1 in 422 |
| Virginia | #99 | 62 | 1 in 391 |
| Kentucky | #100 | 57 | 1 in 422 |
| Arkansas | #104 | 45 | 1 in 364 |
| Tennessee | #106 | 56 | 1 in 413 |
| Maryland | #117 | 19 | 1 in 634 |
| Missouri | #130 | 48 | 1 in 601 |
| Indiana | #142 | 29 | 1 in 818 |
| Montana | #143 | 8 | 1 in 640 |
| Oregon | #147 | 7 | 1 in 695 |
| Colorado | #164 | 8 | 1 in 849 |
| Kansas | #164 | 17 | 1 in 870 |
| Texas | #165 | 62 | 1 in 727 |
| Michigan | #181 | 27 | 1 in 1,195 |
| Ohio | #186 | 41 | 1 in 1,170 |
| Washington | #186 | 8 | 1 in 1,048 |
| Pennsylvania | #188 | 60 | 1 in 1,488 |
| Iowa | #189 | 17 | 1 in 1,217 |
| Illinois | #195 | 43 | 1 in 1,347 |
| Maine | #206 | 5 | 1 in 1,144 |
| New Jersey | #207 | 16 | 1 in 1,794 |
| Minnesota | #230 | 13 | 1 in 1,665 |
| California | #236 | 12 | 1 in 1,630 |
| Massachusetts | #237 | 13 | 1 in 2,559 |
| Wisconsin | #249 | 11 | 1 in 2,139 |
| New York | #253 | 37 | 1 in 2,540 |
| Nebraska | #265 | 6 | 1 in 1,877 |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Daisy
- 1 spot since 2024 (#76 → #75)
- 68 spots since 2020 (#143 → #75)
- 108 spots since 2015 (#183 → #75)
- Biggest jump: 152 spots in 1983 (#366 → #214)
- Biggest drop: 52 spots in 1978 (#554 → #606)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #48 (648 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 84 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1880–1908
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 161 girls born in 1880 were named Daisy (0.62%)
- Latest: 1 in 501 girls born in 2025 (0.20%)
- Its best rank, #48 in 1882, was only 1 in 166 (0.60%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 14.4% of all girls named Daisy (22,807) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #48 (1882) → #628 (1972) → #75 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6,054 | #48 (1882) | #59 |
| 1890s | 6,249 | #76 (1890) | #83 |
| 1900s | 7,687 | #81 (1900) | #90 |
| 1910s | 12,475 | #101 (1910) | #129 |
| 1920s | 13,658 | #155 (1920) | #166 |
| 1930s | 9,063 | #176 (1932) | #196 |
| 1940s | 6,934 | #218 (1940) | #269 |
| 1950s | 5,099 | #336 (1950) | #387 |
| 1960s | 3,538 | #453 (1960) | #519 |
| 1970s | 3,083 | #519 (1979) | #563 |
| 1980s | 9,159 | #214 (1983) | #287 |
| 1990s | 19,991 | #124 (1996) | #161 |
| 2000s | 22,807 | #136 (2003) | #148 |
| 2010s | 17,884 | #151 (2010) | #175 |
| 2020s | 15,042 | #75 (2025) | #110 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Daisy in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 691 of them was named Daisy, which outranked 97.3% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 98,898 of them was named Daisy, which outranked 39.8% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,543Vonnie10
- #2,543Worthy10
- #2,543Zoltan10
- #2,730Daisy9
- #2,730Abelardo9
- #2,730Abron9
- #2,730Albie9
- #2,926Ab8
- #2,926Adalbert8
- #2,926Agnes8
Tied with 195 names at #2,730; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.