Daquan
Last seen for girls in 1994 at #11,778 · #3,181 for boys in 2025, 37 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1994 · 626 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 7,970since 1975
Daquan over time
Rank among boys' names. Daquan has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,181 | 37 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,272 | 36 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,293 | 36 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,717 | 48 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,173 | 65 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,323 | 58 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,310 | 59 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,147 | 65 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,240 | 59 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,086 | 67 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,355 | 55 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,920 | 75 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,709 | 86 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,891 | 76 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,644 | 92 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,574 | 100 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,390 | 122 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,182 | 150 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,124 | 160 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,058 | 169 | |
| 2005 | — | #987 | 175 | |
| 2004 | — | #824 | 216 | |
| 2003 | — | #724 | 253 | |
| 2002 | — | #667 | 280 | |
| 2001 | — | #602 | 326 | |
| 2000 | — | #580 | 344 | |
| 1999 | — | #548 | 366 | |
| 1998 | — | #518 | 402 | |
| 1997 | — | #435 | 516 | |
| 1996 | — | #440 | 508 | |
| 1995 | — | #387 | 601 | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #374 | 626 |
| 1993 | — | #466 | 453 | |
| 1992 | — | #605 | 291 | |
| 1991 | — | #586 | 300 | |
| 1990 | — | #708 | 206 | |
| 1989 | — | #830 | 144 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,047 | 89 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,202 | 64 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,645 | 39 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,724 | 35 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,979 | 27 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,493 | 19 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,831 | 16 | |
| 1981 | — | #3,412 | 12 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,495 | 8 | |
| 1979 | — | #4,403 | 8 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,070 | 13 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,941 | 8 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Daquan! It came in at #3,941, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1976–1977, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Daquan is popular in 1995
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#58 · 1 in 230
- South Carolina#81 · 1 in 424
- Maryland#112 · 1 in 590
- Virginia#134 · 1 in 814
- North Carolina#139 · 1 in 786
Best ever in a state: #58 in District of Columbia, 1995.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #58 | 24 | 1 in 230 |
| South Carolina | #81 | 47 | 1 in 424 |
| Maryland | #112 | 50 | 1 in 590 |
| Virginia | #134 | 49 | 1 in 814 |
| North Carolina | #139 | 57 | 1 in 786 |
| New Jersey | #175 | 41 | 1 in 1,208 |
| Connecticut | #186 | 15 | 1 in 1,288 |
| Pennsylvania | #210 | 42 | 1 in 1,688 |
| New York | #221 | 82 | 1 in 1,492 |
| Iowa | #348 | 5 | 1 in 3,271 |
| Ohio | #374 | 20 | 1 in 3,595 |
| Kentucky | #376 | 6 | 1 in 3,866 |
| Mississippi | #388 | 6 | 1 in 2,509 |
| Georgia | #396 | 17 | 1 in 2,848 |
| Massachusetts | #396 | 8 | 1 in 4,710 |
| Louisiana | #405 | 11 | 1 in 2,475 |
| Michigan | #414 | 17 | 1 in 3,559 |
| Florida | #453 | 23 | 1 in 3,691 |
| Illinois | #496 | 19 | 1 in 4,348 |
| Wisconsin | #522 | 5 | 1 in 5,885 |
| Indiana | #563 | 6 | 1 in 6,350 |
| Tennessee | #629 | 5 | 1 in 6,905 |
| California | #1,035 | 14 | 1 in 18,577 |
| Texas | #1,160 | 8 | 1 in 19,138 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Daquan
- 91 spots since 2024 (#3,272 → #3,181)
- 858 spots since 2020 (#2,323 → #3,181)
- 826 spots since 2015 (#2,355 → #3,181)
- Biggest jump: 217 spots in 1989 (#1,047 → #830)
- Biggest drop: 163 spots in 2005 (#824 → #987)
- Debuted 1975
- Peaked 1994 at #374 (626 births)
- Births halved by 2002, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 1989–2005
- Highest: 1 in 3,086 boys born in 1994 were named Daquan (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 46,164 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 53.6% of all boys named Daquan (4,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 39 | #3,070 (1978) | #4,569 |
| 1980s | 453 | #830 (1989) | #2,166 |
| 1990s | 4,269 | #374 (1994) | #507 |
| 2000s | 2,195 | #580 (2000) | #914 |
| 2010s | 734 | #1,574 (2010) | #1,988 |
| 2020s | 280 | #2,173 (2021) | #2,827 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Daquan in 1995
Top boys' names in 1995
More about 1995
boys
1,903,701 boys got a published name in 1995; 1 in 3,168 of them was named Daquan, which outranked 96.3% of the 10,330 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.