Debby
Last seen for girls in 2016 at #11,781
- Peak · girls
- 1959 · 890 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,697since 1923
Debby over time
Rank among girls' names. Debby has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | — | |
| 2018 | — | |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 |
| 2014 | #13,069 | 7 |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 |
| 2012 | #8,632 | 13 |
| 2011 | — | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 |
| 2003 | #12,408 | 7 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 |
| 2000 | #8,534 | 11 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 |
| 1996 | #6,064 | 15 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 |
| 1990 | #5,060 | 18 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 |
| 1987 | #5,312 | 14 |
| 1986 | #4,964 | 15 |
| 1985 | #3,852 | 21 |
| 1984 | #3,329 | 25 |
| 1983 | #3,687 | 21 |
| 1982 | #3,260 | 26 |
| 1981 | #2,614 | 35 |
| 1980 | #2,749 | 33 |
| 1979 | #2,218 | 44 |
| 1978 | #2,125 | 44 |
| 1977 | #2,341 | 38 |
| 1976 | #2,792 | 27 |
| 1975 | #2,196 | 38 |
| 1974 | #1,733 | 52 |
| 1973 | #1,478 | 64 |
| 1972 | #1,541 | 60 |
| 1971 | #1,266 | 87 |
| 1970 | #1,083 | 110 |
| 1969 | #1,066 | 106 |
| 1968 | #947 | 120 |
| 1967 | #793 | 157 |
| 1966 | #728 | 183 |
| 1965 | #591 | 262 |
| 1964 | #542 | 332 |
| 1963 | #466 | 433 |
| 1962 | #434 | 503 |
| 1961 | #399 | 590 |
| 1960 | #372 | 668 |
| 1959 | #309 | 890 |
| 1958 | #333 | 795 |
| 1957 | #355 | 661 |
| 1956 | #425 | 461 |
| 1955 | #461 | 384 |
| 1954 | #510 | 303 |
| 1953 | #515 | 277 |
| 1952 | #549 | 244 |
| 1951 | #552 | 233 |
| 1950 | #572 | 212 |
| 1949 | #581 | 203 |
| 1948 | #583 | 207 |
| 1947 | #768 | 125 |
| 1946 | #961 | 75 |
| 1945 | #1,332 | 36 |
| 1944 | #1,545 | 28 |
| 1943 | #1,664 | 26 |
| 1942 | #1,533 | 29 |
| 1941 | #2,272 | 14 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 |
| 1939 | #2,206 | 14 |
| 1938 | #2,579 | 11 |
| 1937 | #2,735 | 10 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 |
| 1935 | #3,742 | 6 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1933 | #2,540 | 11 |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Debby! It came in at #4,967, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1923–1928, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Debby is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#194 · 1 in 1,111
- Rhode Island#215 · 1 in 1,566
- Idaho#266 · 1 in 1,207
- Utah#289 · 1 in 1,508
- Kansas#289 · 1 in 1,804
Best ever in a state: #135 in Vermont, 1957.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #194 | 5 | 1 in 1,111 |
| Rhode Island | #215 | 5 | 1 in 1,566 |
| Idaho | #266 | 5 | 1 in 1,207 |
| Kansas | #289 | 11 | 1 in 1,804 |
| Utah | #289 | 7 | 1 in 1,508 |
| Minnesota | #290 | 16 | 1 in 2,368 |
| Wisconsin | #302 | 15 | 1 in 2,822 |
| Nebraska | #315 | 6 | 1 in 2,389 |
| Arkansas | #318 | 8 | 1 in 2,204 |
| Oklahoma | #326 | 10 | 1 in 2,061 |
| Michigan | #327 | 31 | 1 in 2,648 |
| Massachusetts | #329 | 15 | 1 in 3,424 |
| Indiana | #333 | 18 | 1 in 2,689 |
| Oregon | #333 | 7 | 1 in 2,200 |
| Tennessee | #356 | 12 | 1 in 2,966 |
| Colorado | #359 | 8 | 1 in 2,398 |
| Kentucky | #361 | 10 | 1 in 3,082 |
| Washington | #363 | 11 | 1 in 2,522 |
| Missouri | #376 | 13 | 1 in 3,276 |
| West Virginia | #376 | 5 | 1 in 3,225 |
| Connecticut | #384 | 6 | 1 in 3,945 |
| Illinois | #390 | 29 | 1 in 3,547 |
| Iowa | #390 | 7 | 1 in 3,908 |
| Pennsylvania | #390 | 27 | 1 in 3,865 |
| Maryland | #394 | 8 | 1 in 3,661 |
| Ohio | #410 | 23 | 1 in 4,281 |
| New Jersey | #415 | 14 | 1 in 4,075 |
| North Carolina | #447 | 11 | 1 in 4,335 |
| Virginia | #458 | 8 | 1 in 5,029 |
| California | #460 | 46 | 1 in 3,771 |
| Georgia | #463 | 10 | 1 in 4,368 |
| Arizona | #464 | 5 | 1 in 3,086 |
| Mississippi | #491 | 6 | 1 in 4,119 |
| Alabama | #542 | 6 | 1 in 5,558 |
| Florida | #559 | 9 | 1 in 5,467 |
| Louisiana | #564 | 8 | 1 in 4,756 |
| Texas | #660 | 17 | 1 in 6,503 |
| New York | #675 | 18 | 1 in 9,076 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Debby
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2016
- Biggest jump: 371 spots in 1946 (#1,332 → #961)
- Biggest drop: 154 spots in 1968 (#793 → #947)
- Debuted 1923
- Peaked 1959 at #309 (890 births)
- Births halved by 1963, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 23 yrs · run 1946–1968
- Highest: 1 in 2,274 girls born in 1959 were named Debby (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 221,503 girls born in 2016 (0.00%)
- 46.0% of all girls named Debby (4,460) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 12 | #3,682 (1929) | #4,325 |
| 1930s | 96 | #2,032 (1936) | #3,066 |
| 1940s | 750 | #581 (1949) | #1,474 |
| 1950s | 4,460 | #309 (1959) | #458 |
| 1960s | 3,354 | #372 (1960) | #634 |
| 1970s | 564 | #1,083 (1970) | #1,877 |
| 1980s | 216 | #2,614 (1981) | #4,198 |
| 1990s | 127 | #5,060 (1990) | #7,264 |
| 2000s | 73 | #8,534 (2000) | #13,177 |
| 2010s | 45 | #8,632 (2012) | #13,316 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Debby in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 3,910 of them was named Debby, which outranked 94.3% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.