Diamond

#2,017 for girls in 2025, 94 births · #3,181 for boys in 2025, 37 births
Given to girls 92.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1999 · 2,160 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
33,733
since 1908

Diamond over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202016peak #150, 1999peak #942, 1897girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,01794#3,18137
2024#1,613129#2,44456
2023#1,603130#2,89543
2022#1,590133#2,51754
2021#1,410154#2,91842
2020#1,334165#3,13636
2019#1,218192#3,34734
2018#1,122218#4,09425
2017#1,108227#3,58630
2016#1,113228#3,29334
2015#1,014264#3,23135
2014#884308#4,39222
2013#707395#4,46321
2012#787347#5,25617
2011#759363#3,69528
2010#633463#3,37732
2009#495618#4,74820
2008#446706#3,74428
2007#356912#3,59129
2006#3151,053#3,60228
2005#3011,057#3,52827
2004#2631,223#3,21730
2003#2351,400#2,39244
2002#2071,579#2,75534
2001#1671,945#1,93556
2000#1622,081#2,22244
1999#1502,160#1,93250
1998#1641,919#1,41880
1997#1811,676#1,40278
1996#1791,697#1,30384
1995#1791,682#1,24487
1994#1701,786#1,128101
1993#1921,522#1,18589
1992#2191,301#1,11996
1991#324826#1,14792
1990#429591#1,32670
1989#516455#1,30870
1988#596336#1,39556
1987#702260#1,50647
1986#958164#1,45747
1985#1,060139#1,41648
1984#1,27299#1,63036
1983#1,37986#2,08525
1982#1,36390#1,81531
1981#1,91256#2,13824
1980#1,83359#1,91029
1979#2,11247#1,67034
1978#1,82455#2,37519
1977#2,42336#2,55617
1976#3,40720#2,60116
1975#3,63718#2,00123
1974#3,42619#2,94612
1973#6,0808#2,51315
1972#6,5587#2,41815
1971#6,0068#4,3756
1970—#3,5218
1969#5,0579#4,4045
1968#4,7799#3,1078
1967——
1966#5,2737—
1965—#3,5376
1964——
1963#6,5925—
1962——
1961#6,5675#3,3567
1960——
1959#5,0317#3,6196
1958—#3,5596
1957—#3,5526
1956#4,8377#3,2167
1955—#3,5056
1954—#3,8275
1953——
1952—#3,3736
1951—#3,7145
1950—#2,7708
1949#5,2445—
1948—#2,7888
1947—#3,0967
1946—#3,5255
1945#4,5565#2,9966
1944—#3,4305
1943——
1942—#2,9407
1941——
1940——
1939——
1938——
1937——
1936—#2,8547
1935——
1934——
1933—#3,2686
1932#3,0479—
1931—#3,7635
1930—#2,7819
1929#4,5705#3,5596
1928#4,7255—
1927#3,8757#2,70310
1926#3,5648#2,9049
1925#3,3629#3,4087
1924#2,97311#4,3475
1923#3,12510#4,2395
1922#5,0095#2,63011
1921#2,94111#2,80410
1920#2,89911#2,76510
1919#4,2516#4,1685
1918#2,67412#2,39812
1917#3,3448#2,56210
1916#2,83310#2,7309
1915#3,4347#3,0827
1914——
1913#2,1649—
1912#2,6346—
1911——
1910#1,9357—
1909#1,9576—
1908#1,8626—
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903—#1,1305
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897—#9426
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1908

The first year at least five girls were named Diamond! It came in at #1,862, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1911, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Diamond is popular in 2016

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedMNIllinois: #990 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,763 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedMINew York: #1,732 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 12,834 girlsNYMassachusetts: #844 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,095 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedIAIndiana: #920 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,049 girlsINOhio: #952 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,785 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #940 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,225 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,388 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 10,186 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedNEMissouri: #958 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,425 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedWVVirginia: #842 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,642 girlsVAMaryland: #678 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,434 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedNMKansas: #522 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,101 girlsKSArkansas: #553 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,257 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #847 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,531 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #401 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,614 girlsLAMississippi: #207 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 740 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedALGeorgia: #848 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,368 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedHITexas: #1,127 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 7,274 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Diamond, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#207 · 1 in 740
  2. Louisiana#401 · 1 in 1,614
  3. Kansas#522 · 1 in 2,101
  4. Arkansas#553 · 1 in 2,257
  5. Maryland#678 · 1 in 3,434

Best ever in a state: #8 in District of Columbia, 1999.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#207151 in 740
Louisiana#401131 in 1,614
Kansas#52261 in 2,101
Arkansas#55351 in 2,257
Maryland#67871 in 3,434
Virginia#84281 in 4,642
Massachusetts#84451 in 5,095
North Carolina#847101 in 4,531
Georgia#848111 in 4,368
Indiana#92061 in 5,049
New Jersey#94071 in 5,225
Ohio#95291 in 5,785
Missouri#95851 in 5,425
Illinois#990101 in 5,763
Texas#1,127231 in 7,274
California#1,388201 in 10,186
New York#1,73271 in 12,834
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Diamond
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 404 spots since 2024 (#1,613 → #2,017)
  • 683 spots since 2020 (#1,334 → #2,017)
  • 1,003 spots since 2015 (#1,014 → #2,017)
  • Biggest jump: 256 spots in 1987 (#958 → #702)
  • Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#707 → #884)
Rise & fade · girls
91 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1908
  • Peaked 1999 at #150 (2,160 births)
  • Births halved by 2005, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 29 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1986–2014
Share of babies · girls
1 in 821
  • Highest: 1 in 821 girls born in 1999 were named Diamond (0.12%)
  • Latest: 1 in 17,099 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 44.9% of all girls named Diamond (15,160) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1976
  • Mostly boys until 1975, mostly girls since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s12#1,862 (1908)#1,910
1910s65#1,935 (1910)#2,909
1920s82#2,899 (1920)#3,704
1930s9#3,047 (1932)#3,047
1940s10#4,556 (1945)#4,900
1950s14#4,837 (1956)#4,934
1960s35#4,779 (1968)#5,654
1970s218#1,824 (1978)#3,941
1980s1,744#516 (1989)#1,159
1990s15,160#150 (1999)#219
2000s12,574#162 (2000)#295
2010s3,005#633 (2010)#935
2020s805#1,334 (2020)#1,595

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Diamond in 2016

girls
#1,113
228 births · 1 in 7,772 girls
boys
#3,293
34 births · 1 in 55,816 boys

Top girls' names in 2016

  1. #1Emma19,550
  2. #2Olivia19,414
  3. #3Ava16,354
  4. #4Sophia16,185
  5. #5Isabella14,863
  6. #6Mia14,464
  7. #7Charlotte13,118
  8. #8Abigail11,796
  9. #9Emily11,006
  10. #10Amelia10,809
  11. #1,113Diamond228

Top boys' names in 2016

  1. #1Noah19,188
  2. #2Liam18,277
  3. #3William15,810
  4. #4Mason15,287
  5. #5James14,920
  6. #6Benjamin14,686
  7. #7Jacob14,559
  8. #8Michael14,145
  9. #9Elijah13,982
  10. #10Ethan13,855
  11. #3,293Diamond34
More about 2016

girls

1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 7,772 of them was named Diamond, which outranked 94.1% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Diamond
  1. #1,110Austyn229
  2. #1,110Berkley229
  3. #1,110Kelsie229
  4. #1,113Diamond228
  5. #1,113Alora228
  6. #1,113August228
  7. #1,113Jubilee228
  8. #1,117Sherlyn227
  9. #1,118Alaysia226
  10. #1,118Campbell226

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,389Kehlani#3,254 → #865
  2. ↑ 612Royalty#1,146 → #534
  3. ↑ 481Saoirse#1,448 → #967
  4. ↑ 396Ophelia#978 → #582
  5. ↑ 364Aitana#915 → #551
Fallers
  1. ↓ 542Caitlin#610 → #1,152
  2. ↓ 451Caitlyn#598 → #1,049
  3. ↓ 397Katelynn#652 → #1,049
  4. ↓ 382Kaitlynn#989 → #1,371
  5. ↓ 340Neriah#946 → #1,286

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,897,738 boys got a published name in 2016; 1 in 55,816 of them was named Diamond, which outranked 76.8% of the 14,207 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Diamond
  1. #3,230Yamir35
  2. #3,230Zaevion35
  3. #3,230Zair35
  4. #3,293Diamond34
  5. #3,293Aaditya34
  6. #3,293Aayansh34
  7. #3,293Adil34
  8. #3,358Abubakr33
  9. #3,358Adair33
  10. #3,358Adham33

Tied with 64 names at #3,293; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,327Kylo#3,231 → #904
  2. ↑ 355Creed#1,340 → #985
  3. ↑ 349Benicio#1,327 → #978
  4. ↑ 303Adonis#698 → #395
  5. ↑ 291Fox#1,035 → #744
Fallers
  1. ↓ 477Jonael#922 → #1,399
  2. ↓ 238Aaden#784 → #1,022
  3. ↓ 233Triston#950 → #1,183
  4. ↓ 223Freddy#993 → #1,216
  5. ↓ 207Chace#934 → #1,141

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2016 →