Dianne
#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #7,270
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1945 · 3,611 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 10 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 95,289since 1911
Dianne over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | — | |
| 2024 | #8,443 | 12 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,549 | 22 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,465 | 23 | — | |
| 2021 | #5,955 | 20 | — | |
| 2020 | #5,003 | 25 | — | |
| 2019 | #6,414 | 18 | — | |
| 2018 | #5,454 | 23 | — | |
| 2017 | #6,808 | 17 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,632 | 30 | — | |
| 2015 | #5,127 | 26 | — | |
| 2014 | #6,207 | 20 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,076 | 36 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,296 | 34 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,843 | 39 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,624 | 43 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,512 | 46 | — | |
| 2008 | #3,377 | 49 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,992 | 59 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,469 | 46 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,730 | 39 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,889 | 55 | — | |
| 2003 | #3,232 | 45 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,310 | 70 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,193 | 74 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,332 | 66 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,222 | 67 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,026 | 73 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,816 | 82 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,767 | 84 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,955 | 70 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,476 | 107 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,554 | 100 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,462 | 108 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,407 | 114 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,208 | 140 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,234 | 129 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,118 | 137 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #1,002 | 156 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,177 | 120 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,060 | 139 | — | |
| 1984 | #918 | 162 | — | |
| 1983 | #902 | 167 | — | |
| 1982 | #880 | 175 | — | |
| 1981 | #875 | 175 | — | |
| 1980 | #959 | 154 | — | |
| 1979 | #808 | 195 | — | |
| 1978 | #867 | 169 | — | |
| 1977 | #748 | 204 | — | |
| 1976 | #684 | 216 | — | |
| 1975 | #637 | 242 | — | |
| 1974 | #533 | 314 | — | |
| 1973 | #467 | 390 | — | |
| 1972 | #411 | 479 | — | |
| 1971 | #377 | 618 | — | |
| 1970 | #296 | 976 | — | |
| 1969 | #294 | 954 | — | |
| 1968 | #246 | 1,111 | — | |
| 1967 | #236 | 1,220 | — | |
| 1966 | #212 | 1,429 | — | |
| 1965 | #202 | 1,637 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1964 | #202 | 1,823 | #2,854 | 9 |
| 1963 | #197 | 1,897 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #183 | 2,066 | #3,305 | 7 |
| 1961 | #178 | 2,173 | — | |
| 1960 | #160 | 2,618 | — | |
| 1959 | #158 | 2,701 | #2,530 | 11 |
| 1958 | #143 | 2,935 | #3,944 | 5 |
| 1957 | #135 | 3,186 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #137 | 3,066 | #3,535 | 6 |
| 1955 | #121 | 3,496 | #2,302 | 12 |
| 1954 | #116 | 3,643 | #2,449 | 11 |
| 1953 | #109 | 3,617 | — | |
| 1952 | #96 | 3,895 | #2,875 | 8 |
| 1951 | #90 | 4,034 | #2,246 | 12 |
| 1950 | #90 | 3,921 | — | |
| 1949 | #85 | 4,141 | #2,802 | 8 |
| 1948 | #86 | 4,138 | #2,608 | 9 |
| 1947 | #83 | 4,415 | #3,370 | 6 |
| 1946 | #76 | 4,278 | #2,919 | 7 |
| 1945 | #72 | 3,611 | #1,697 | 16 |
| 1944 | #90 | 3,107 | #2,080 | 12 |
| 1943 | #88 | 3,193 | #2,405 | 10 |
| 1942 | #109 | 2,547 | #2,940 | 7 |
| 1941 | #146 | 1,631 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #167 | 1,235 | — | |
| 1939 | #192 | 923 | — | |
| 1938 | #210 | 817 | — | |
| 1937 | #240 | 673 | — | |
| 1936 | #310 | 381 | — | |
| 1935 | #299 | 413 | — | |
| 1934 | #356 | 312 | — | |
| 1933 | #467 | 197 | — | |
| 1932 | #537 | 146 | — | |
| 1931 | #649 | 104 | — | |
| 1930 | #831 | 73 | — | |
| 1929 | #822 | 74 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,097 | 47 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,095 | 18 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,623 | 26 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,891 | 21 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,062 | 19 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,587 | 13 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,027 | 19 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,048 | 19 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,172 | 17 | — | |
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #3,258 | 8 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | — | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Dianne! It came in at #2,191, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1912–1914, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Dianne is popular in 1956
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Carolina#47 · 1 in 216
- Louisiana#57 · 1 in 248
- Massachusetts#66 · 1 in 305
- Mississippi#72 · 1 in 312
- Rhode Island#73 · 1 in 336
Best ever in a state: #29 in Minnesota, 1945.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #47 | 134 | 1 in 216 |
| Louisiana | #57 | 159 | 1 in 248 |
| Massachusetts | #66 | 170 | 1 in 305 |
| Mississippi | #72 | 86 | 1 in 312 |
| Georgia | #73 | 137 | 1 in 341 |
| Rhode Island | #73 | 25 | 1 in 336 |
| New Hampshire | #74 | 20 | 1 in 268 |
| Maine | #89 | 30 | 1 in 323 |
| North Carolina | #92 | 117 | 1 in 443 |
| Alabama | #97 | 79 | 1 in 464 |
| Tennessee | #106 | 73 | 1 in 526 |
| Minnesota | #107 | 78 | 1 in 475 |
| Nebraska | #113 | 29 | 1 in 499 |
| Wyoming | #118 | 7 | 1 in 419 |
| Virginia | #119 | 69 | 1 in 599 |
| South Dakota | #121 | 16 | 1 in 467 |
| Arkansas | #122 | 29 | 1 in 651 |
| Montana | #124 | 14 | 1 in 490 |
| Washington | #132 | 51 | 1 in 562 |
| Wisconsin | #133 | 64 | 1 in 656 |
| Oregon | #137 | 27 | 1 in 597 |
| Michigan | #138 | 129 | 1 in 729 |
| Florida | #140 | 68 | 1 in 632 |
| North Dakota | #141 | 11 | 1 in 612 |
| Ohio | #143 | 152 | 1 in 706 |
| Pennsylvania | #144 | 159 | 1 in 728 |
| Texas | #150 | 160 | 1 in 718 |
| Illinois | #151 | 133 | 1 in 789 |
| Delaware | #152 | 6 | 1 in 742 |
| Kentucky | #152 | 39 | 1 in 860 |
| Utah | #152 | 17 | 1 in 620 |
| District of Columbia | #155 | 17 | 1 in 795 |
| New Jersey | #156 | 64 | 1 in 861 |
| Iowa | #158 | 35 | 1 in 808 |
| New York | #163 | 197 | 1 in 836 |
| Maryland | #166 | 32 | 1 in 921 |
| Colorado | #167 | 25 | 1 in 750 |
| Missouri | #167 | 49 | 1 in 914 |
| California | #168 | 187 | 1 in 836 |
| Oklahoma | #171 | 27 | 1 in 826 |
| Indiana | #175 | 48 | 1 in 1,052 |
| Kansas | #175 | 23 | 1 in 958 |
| West Virginia | #196 | 16 | 1 in 1,244 |
| Connecticut | #211 | 15 | 1 in 1,570 |
| Arizona | #219 | 13 | 1 in 993 |
| Hawaii | #232 | 7 | 1 in 898 |
| Idaho | #242 | 5 | 1 in 1,254 |
| New Mexico | #248 | 9 | 1 in 1,220 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dianne
- 2,721 spots since 2024 (#8,443 → #5,722)
- 719 spots since 2020 (#5,003 → #5,722)
- 595 spots since 2015 (#5,127 → #5,722)
- Biggest jump: 275 spots in 1929 (#1,097 → #822)
- Biggest drop: 151 spots in 1980 (#808 → #959)
- Debuted 1911
- Peaked 1945 at #72 (3,611 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 10 yrs · run 1943–1952
- Top 1,000: 56 yrs · run 1929–1984
- Highest: 1 in 362 girls born in 1945 were named Dianne (0.28%)
- Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 36.2% of all girls named Dianne (34,494) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 39 | #2,191 (1911) | #3,125 |
| 1920s | 273 | #822 (1929) | #1,842 |
| 1930s | 4,039 | #192 (1939) | #409 |
| 1940s | 32,296 | #72 (1945) | #100 |
| 1950s | 34,494 | #90 (1951) | #120 |
| 1960s | 16,928 | #160 (1960) | #211 |
| 1970s | 3,803 | #296 (1970) | #583 |
| 1980s | 1,514 | #875 (1981) | #1,013 |
| 1990s | 945 | #1,208 (1990) | #1,689 |
| 2000s | 549 | #2,193 (2001) | #3,004 |
| 2010s | 286 | #3,624 (2010) | #5,048 |
| 2020s | 123 | #5,003 (2020) | #6,023 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dianne in 1956
Top girls' names in 1956
Top boys' names in 1956
More about 1956
girls
2,007,703 girls got a published name in 1956; 1 in 655 of them was named Dianne, which outranked 98.0% of the 6,891 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 352,550 of them was named Dianne, which outranked 20.7% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,216Wynne7
- #3,216Yitzchok7
- #3,216Yolanda7
- #3,535Dianne6
- #3,535Abbie6
- #3,535Abbott6
- #3,535Abie6
- #3,942Abdul5
- #3,942Abran5
- #3,942Abundio5
Tied with 406 names at #3,535; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.